Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Importance
Payment system design creates incentives that impact healthcare spending, access, and outcomes. With Medicare Advantage accounting for more than half of Medicare spending, changes to its risk adjustment algorithm have the potential for broad consequences.
Objective
To develop risk adjustment algorithms that can achieve fair spending targets, and compare their performance to a baseline that emulates the least squares regression approach used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Design
Retrospective analysis of Traditional Medicare enrollment and claims data between January 2017 and December 2020. Diagnoses in claims were mapped to Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs). Algorithms used demographic indicators and HCCs from one calendar year to predict Medicare spending in the subsequent year.
Setting
Data from Medicare beneficiaries with documented residence in the United States or Puerto Rico.
Participants
A random 20% sample of beneficiaries enrolled in Traditional Medicare. Included beneficiaries were aged 65 years and older, and did not have Medicaid dual eligibility. Race/ethnicity was assigned using the Research Triangle Institute enhanced indicator.
Main Outcome and Measures
Prospective healthcare spending by Medicare. Overall performance was measured by payment system fit and mean absolute error. Net compensation was used to assess group-level fairness.
Results
The main analysis included 4,398,035 Medicare beneficiaries with a mean age of 75.2 years and mean annual Medicare spending of $8,345. Out-of-sample payment system fit for the baseline regression was 12.7%. Constrained regression and post-processing both achieved fair spending targets, while maintaining payment system fit values of 12.6% and 12.7%, respectively. Whereas post-processing only increased mean payments for beneficiaries in minoritized racial/ethnic groups, constrained regression increased mean payments for beneficiaries in minoritized racial/ethnic groups and beneficiaries in other groups residing in counties with greater exposure to socioeconomic factors that can adversely affect health outcomes.
Conclusions and Relevance
Constrained regression and post-processing can incorporate fairness objectives in the Medicare risk adjustment algorithm with minimal reduction in overall fit.
Title: Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment
Description:
Abstract
Importance
Payment system design creates incentives that impact healthcare spending, access, and outcomes.
With Medicare Advantage accounting for more than half of Medicare spending, changes to its risk adjustment algorithm have the potential for broad consequences.
Objective
To develop risk adjustment algorithms that can achieve fair spending targets, and compare their performance to a baseline that emulates the least squares regression approach used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Design
Retrospective analysis of Traditional Medicare enrollment and claims data between January 2017 and December 2020.
Diagnoses in claims were mapped to Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs).
Algorithms used demographic indicators and HCCs from one calendar year to predict Medicare spending in the subsequent year.
Setting
Data from Medicare beneficiaries with documented residence in the United States or Puerto Rico.
Participants
A random 20% sample of beneficiaries enrolled in Traditional Medicare.
Included beneficiaries were aged 65 years and older, and did not have Medicaid dual eligibility.
Race/ethnicity was assigned using the Research Triangle Institute enhanced indicator.
Main Outcome and Measures
Prospective healthcare spending by Medicare.
Overall performance was measured by payment system fit and mean absolute error.
Net compensation was used to assess group-level fairness.
Results
The main analysis included 4,398,035 Medicare beneficiaries with a mean age of 75.
2 years and mean annual Medicare spending of $8,345.
Out-of-sample payment system fit for the baseline regression was 12.
7%.
Constrained regression and post-processing both achieved fair spending targets, while maintaining payment system fit values of 12.
6% and 12.
7%, respectively.
Whereas post-processing only increased mean payments for beneficiaries in minoritized racial/ethnic groups, constrained regression increased mean payments for beneficiaries in minoritized racial/ethnic groups and beneficiaries in other groups residing in counties with greater exposure to socioeconomic factors that can adversely affect health outcomes.
Conclusions and Relevance
Constrained regression and post-processing can incorporate fairness objectives in the Medicare risk adjustment algorithm with minimal reduction in overall fit.
Related Results
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review
AbstractObjectiveStatistical and artificial intelligence algorithms are increasingly being developed for use in healthcare. These algorithms may reflect biases that magnify dispari...
Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers
Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers
Background:
Evidence is limited on insured patients’ use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States.
...
Stage of Change for Making an Informed Decision about Medicare Health Plans
Stage of Change for Making an Informed Decision about Medicare Health Plans
Objective. To assess the applicability of the transtheoretical model of change (TTM) to informed choice in the Medicare population.Data Sources/Study Setting. Two hundred and thi...
Double Fairness Policy Learning: Integrating Action Fairness and Outcome Fairness in Decision-making
Double Fairness Policy Learning: Integrating Action Fairness and Outcome Fairness in Decision-making
Fairness is a central pillar of trustworthy machine learning, especially in domains where accuracy-or profit-driven optimization is insufficient. While most fairness research focus...
Double Fairness Policy Learning: Integrating Action Fairness and Outcome Fairness in Decision-making
Double Fairness Policy Learning: Integrating Action Fairness and Outcome Fairness in Decision-making
Fairness is a central pillar of trustworthy machine learning, especially in domains where accuracy-or profit-driven optimization is insufficient. While most fairness research focus...
Bertrand Game with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concern
Bertrand Game with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concern
The classical Bertrand game is assumed that players are perfectly rational. However, many empirical researches indicate that people have bounded rational behavior with fairness con...
Making Cuts to Medicare: The Views of Patients, Physicians, and the Public
Making Cuts to Medicare: The Views of Patients, Physicians, and the Public
Purpose Cancer-related expenditures are increasing health care costs. Determining how patients with cancer, oncologists, and the general public view Medicare spending and whether t...
Medicare+Choice Appeal Procedures: Reconciling Due Process Rights and Cost Containment
Medicare+Choice Appeal Procedures: Reconciling Due Process Rights and Cost Containment
By signing the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) on August 5, 1997, President Clinton made the most significant changes to Medicare, since its inception in 1965, by adopting market...

