Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The motivations and dynamics of Zimbabwe’s 2017 military coup

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Robert Mugabe resigned as Zimbabwe’s president in November 2017, following a military action called Operation Restore Legacy. This article examines the motivations and dynamics of Operation Restore Legacy, which it characterizes as a coup by military generals that had significant commonalities with historical coups in Africa. This characterization, which is informed by the accounts of coup participants and a reading of the literature, challenges interpretations of the coup as ‘a non-coup-coup’, ‘very Zimbabwean’, or ‘special’. The article argues that the coup was a vote of no confidence in Mugabe’s leadership, which succeeded because soldiers from Zimbabwe’s 1970s independence war subscribed to the coup’s stated ideal to restore liberation struggle principles in the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front party as well as party members who had been sidelined. Liberation war veterans held decisive army and air force command posts when the coup occurred. The article’s emphasis on liberation struggle principles as a crucial determinant of the coup’s success is a counterpoint to game theoretic approaches to coup dynamics that disregard political beliefs as a consequential factor in the realization of coups. In respect of motivations, the article advances interrelating motives and contends that the coup’s catalyst was Mugabe’s refusal to meet his generals on 13 November 2017, for vital talks on widening differences between both parties. Sealing off dialogue catalyzed the coup.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: The motivations and dynamics of Zimbabwe’s 2017 military coup
Description:
ABSTRACT Robert Mugabe resigned as Zimbabwe’s president in November 2017, following a military action called Operation Restore Legacy.
This article examines the motivations and dynamics of Operation Restore Legacy, which it characterizes as a coup by military generals that had significant commonalities with historical coups in Africa.
This characterization, which is informed by the accounts of coup participants and a reading of the literature, challenges interpretations of the coup as ‘a non-coup-coup’, ‘very Zimbabwean’, or ‘special’.
The article argues that the coup was a vote of no confidence in Mugabe’s leadership, which succeeded because soldiers from Zimbabwe’s 1970s independence war subscribed to the coup’s stated ideal to restore liberation struggle principles in the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front party as well as party members who had been sidelined.
Liberation war veterans held decisive army and air force command posts when the coup occurred.
The article’s emphasis on liberation struggle principles as a crucial determinant of the coup’s success is a counterpoint to game theoretic approaches to coup dynamics that disregard political beliefs as a consequential factor in the realization of coups.
In respect of motivations, the article advances interrelating motives and contends that the coup’s catalyst was Mugabe’s refusal to meet his generals on 13 November 2017, for vital talks on widening differences between both parties.
Sealing off dialogue catalyzed the coup.

Related Results

Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd, William Michael Campbell and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe
Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd, William Michael Campbell and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe
385Expropriation — Agricultural land — Taking of property — Land reform programme in Zimbabwe — Zimbabwe compulsorily acquiring applicants’ agricultural lands — Whether lawful — Wh...
Turkey’s July 15th Coup: What Happened and Why
Turkey’s July 15th Coup: What Happened and Why
This book is a collection of essays written by a variety of experts on Turkey and social movements and provides a critical analysis of the role of the Gülen Movement (GM)—or Hizmet...
Coup d’talk
Coup d’talk
Abstract Zimbabwe’s 2017 coup has been variously described as ‘a popular, peaceful revolution’, ‘military assisted transition’, ‘non-coup-coup’, ‘gentle’ coup, ‘the ...
Coup-Proofing in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Region
Coup-Proofing in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Region
Coup-proofing—that is, measures aimed at preventing military coups and ensuring military loyalty—has been a key feature of civil–military relations in Middle Eastern and North Afri...
Small and Medium Enterprises and Distributive Development: An Examination of Regional Disparities in Zimbabwe
Small and Medium Enterprises and Distributive Development: An Examination of Regional Disparities in Zimbabwe
Distributive disparities have become a pressing concern in Zimbabwe, sparking interest in the potential of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to drive inclusive economic growth. I...
Leaders, Generals, Juntas: The Military in Politics and International Conflict Initiation
Leaders, Generals, Juntas: The Military in Politics and International Conflict Initiation
International conflict—war, crises, international disputes, and rivalries between states—has a clear influence on the military’s role in politics and vice versa. Given that the mil...
An analytical study of Ne Win’s 1962 coup d’etat in Burma
An analytical study of Ne Win’s 1962 coup d’etat in Burma
Ne Win made military coup and usurped political power from civilian government in 1962. This coup and the period are significant in Myanmar’s modern history because more than forty...
Finish what we Started
Finish what we Started
Abstract This chapter maintains that Zimbabwean coup-makers’ diplomacy altered the responses of external actors to the 2017 coup. However, the chapter’s argument on ...

Back to Top