Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Holidays versus Schooldays

View through CrossRef
Background and Aims: To examine the influence of school life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by comparing the glycemic control and Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) between the holidays and schooldays. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on 147 patients with T1D (14-19 years) who used an intermittently scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) system to self-test their glucose levels during the periods of school time and holiday time. A record was maintained of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) metrics i.e., Glucose Variability (GV) (%), mean Time in Range (TIR), Time above Range (TAR), Time below Range (TBR), and average time period of the hypoglycemic events during schooldays and the holidays. Results: The study revealed differences between the recorded values during the holidays and schooldays, in % in target 70-180 mg/dL (38.2 vs 49.5; p = 0.039), mean glucose (194 vs 185; p = 0.048), frequency of low glucose events (9.2 vs 5.1; p = 0.036), mean duration of low glucose levels (117 vs 65; p = 0.021), % TBR below 70 mg/dL (2.9 vs 1.45; p = 0.023), % TBR below 54 mg/dL (1.1 vs 0.51; p = 0.031), TAR 181-250 mg/dL (21.1 vs 16.5; p = 0.037) and TAR >250 mg/dL (8.9 vs 6.5; p=0.043). On comparing the HbA1c levels of the study population recorded during the holidays (8.34%) with those recorded during the schooldays (8.13%), the HbA1c values during the school days were observed to be lower; however, no significant changes were noted in the HbA1c level between the holidays and schooldays. Concerning the FreeStyle Libre (FSL) scanning, the frequency during the holidays (n=6.2) was significantly lower than during the schooldays (n=9.5) (p=0.042). Conclusion: From the findings, it appears that children with T1D have good diabetes control during schooldays rather than during the holidays. To improve their glucose control during the holidays, these patients may also benefit from receiving greater attention and guidance. result: The study revealed crucial differences between the recorded values during the holidays and schooldays, in % in target 70-180 mg/dL (38.2 vs 49.5; p = 0.039), mean glucose (194 vs 185; p = 0.048), frequency of low glucose events (9.2 vs 5.1; p = 0.036), mean duration of low glucose levels (117 vs 65; p = 0.021), conclusion: From the findings, it appears that children with T1D have good diabetes control during schooldays rather than during the holidays. In order to improve their glucose control during the holidays, these patients may also benefit from receiving greater attention and guidance.
Title: Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Holidays versus Schooldays
Description:
Background and Aims: To examine the influence of school life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by comparing the glycemic control and Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) between the holidays and schooldays.
Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on 147 patients with T1D (14-19 years) who used an intermittently scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) system to self-test their glucose levels during the periods of school time and holiday time.
A record was maintained of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) metrics i.
e.
, Glucose Variability (GV) (%), mean Time in Range (TIR), Time above Range (TAR), Time below Range (TBR), and average time period of the hypoglycemic events during schooldays and the holidays.
Results: The study revealed differences between the recorded values during the holidays and schooldays, in % in target 70-180 mg/dL (38.
2 vs 49.
5; p = 0.
039), mean glucose (194 vs 185; p = 0.
048), frequency of low glucose events (9.
2 vs 5.
1; p = 0.
036), mean duration of low glucose levels (117 vs 65; p = 0.
021), % TBR below 70 mg/dL (2.
9 vs 1.
45; p = 0.
023), % TBR below 54 mg/dL (1.
1 vs 0.
51; p = 0.
031), TAR 181-250 mg/dL (21.
1 vs 16.
5; p = 0.
037) and TAR >250 mg/dL (8.
9 vs 6.
5; p=0.
043).
On comparing the HbA1c levels of the study population recorded during the holidays (8.
34%) with those recorded during the schooldays (8.
13%), the HbA1c values during the school days were observed to be lower; however, no significant changes were noted in the HbA1c level between the holidays and schooldays.
Concerning the FreeStyle Libre (FSL) scanning, the frequency during the holidays (n=6.
2) was significantly lower than during the schooldays (n=9.
5) (p=0.
042).
Conclusion: From the findings, it appears that children with T1D have good diabetes control during schooldays rather than during the holidays.
To improve their glucose control during the holidays, these patients may also benefit from receiving greater attention and guidance.
result: The study revealed crucial differences between the recorded values during the holidays and schooldays, in % in target 70-180 mg/dL (38.
2 vs 49.
5; p = 0.
039), mean glucose (194 vs 185; p = 0.
048), frequency of low glucose events (9.
2 vs 5.
1; p = 0.
036), mean duration of low glucose levels (117 vs 65; p = 0.
021), conclusion: From the findings, it appears that children with T1D have good diabetes control during schooldays rather than during the holidays.
In order to improve their glucose control during the holidays, these patients may also benefit from receiving greater attention and guidance.

Related Results

Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Diabetes mellitus (DM) has emerged as one of the most pressing public health challenges globally, and Pakistan stands among the countries most severely affected. With rising urbani...
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
ABSTRACT Introduction The assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures ...
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
Objective: The majority of adolescents with type 1 diabetes have poor glycemic control, calling for an action to be taken. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of...
Correlates of Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Eastern Ethiopia: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Correlates of Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Eastern Ethiopia: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
IntroductionEven though optimal blood glucose control reduces the risk of diabetes-related complications, many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) fail to achieve it for a variety ...
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
In millennia, 40 million people were died with non-communicable diseases and diabetes is one of them. In diabetes, insulin secretions are not produced properly or resist to body an...
Predictors of Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in North West Ethiopia: A Longitudinal Study
Predictors of Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in North West Ethiopia: A Longitudinal Study
Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with hyperglycemia for a long period of time are significant causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Studying th...

Back to Top