Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Calculation of ocular magnification in phakic and pseudophakic eyes based on anterior segment OCT data

View through CrossRef
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a straightforward mathematical concept for determination of object to image magnification in both phakic and pseudophakic eyes, based on biometric measures, refractometry and data from an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).MethodsWe have developed a strategy for calculating ocular magnification based on axial length measurement, phakic anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and crystalline lens front and back surface curvatures for the phakic eye, and axial length measurement, anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and intraocular lens power, refractive index and shape factor for the pseudophakic eye. Comparing the magnification of both eyes of one individual yields aniseikonia, while comparing the preoperative and postoperative situation of one eye provides the gain or loss in ocular magnification. The applicability of this strategy is shown using a clinical example and a small case series in 78 eyes of 39 patients before and after cataract surgery.ResultsFor the phakic eye, the refractive index of the crystalline lens was adjusted to balance the optical system. The pseudophakic eye is fully determined and we proposed three strategies for considering a potential mismatch of the data: (A) with spherical equivalent refraction, (B) with intraocular lens power and (C) with the shape factor of the lens. Magnification in the phakic eye was −0.00319 ± 0.00014 and with (A) was −0.00327 ± 0.00013, with (B) was −0.00323 ± 0.00014 and with (C) was −0.00326 ± 0.00013. With A/B/C, the magnification of the pseudophakic eye was on average 2.52 ± 2.83%/1.31 ± 2.84%/2.14 ± 2.80% larger compared with the phakic eye. Magnification changes were within a range of ±10%.ConclusionsOn average, ocular magnification does not change greatly after cataract surgery with implantation of an artificial lens, but in some cases, the change could be up to ±10%. If the changes are not consistent between the left and right eyes, then this could lead to post‐cataract aniseikonia.
Title: Calculation of ocular magnification in phakic and pseudophakic eyes based on anterior segment OCT data
Description:
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a straightforward mathematical concept for determination of object to image magnification in both phakic and pseudophakic eyes, based on biometric measures, refractometry and data from an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).
MethodsWe have developed a strategy for calculating ocular magnification based on axial length measurement, phakic anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and crystalline lens front and back surface curvatures for the phakic eye, and axial length measurement, anterior chamber and lens thickness, keratometry and intraocular lens power, refractive index and shape factor for the pseudophakic eye.
Comparing the magnification of both eyes of one individual yields aniseikonia, while comparing the preoperative and postoperative situation of one eye provides the gain or loss in ocular magnification.
The applicability of this strategy is shown using a clinical example and a small case series in 78 eyes of 39 patients before and after cataract surgery.
ResultsFor the phakic eye, the refractive index of the crystalline lens was adjusted to balance the optical system.
The pseudophakic eye is fully determined and we proposed three strategies for considering a potential mismatch of the data: (A) with spherical equivalent refraction, (B) with intraocular lens power and (C) with the shape factor of the lens.
Magnification in the phakic eye was −0.
00319 ± 0.
00014 and with (A) was −0.
00327 ± 0.
00013, with (B) was −0.
00323 ± 0.
00014 and with (C) was −0.
00326 ± 0.
00013.
With A/B/C, the magnification of the pseudophakic eye was on average 2.
52 ± 2.
83%/1.
31 ± 2.
84%/2.
14 ± 2.
80% larger compared with the phakic eye.
Magnification changes were within a range of ±10%.
ConclusionsOn average, ocular magnification does not change greatly after cataract surgery with implantation of an artificial lens, but in some cases, the change could be up to ±10%.
If the changes are not consistent between the left and right eyes, then this could lead to post‐cataract aniseikonia.

Related Results

Imaging techniques for ocular neoplasia
Imaging techniques for ocular neoplasia
Background: Novel ocular imaging modalities have greatly impacted the diagnosis and management of different types of ocular neoplasia. In this narrative review, we summarize the pr...
Bowman's topography for improved detection of early ectasia
Bowman's topography for improved detection of early ectasia
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether OCT topography of the Bowman's layer and artificial intelligence (AI) can result in better diagnosis of forme fruste (FFKC) an...
Applications of anterior segment OCT to glaucoma surgery
Applications of anterior segment OCT to glaucoma surgery
AbstractPurpose To assess the utility in clinical practice of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) in glaucoma surgery.Methods Consecutive cases review of patients d...
Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry
Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL ...
Fourier analysis of digital retinal images in estimation of cataract severity
Fourier analysis of digital retinal images in estimation of cataract severity
AbstractPurpose:  To evaluate the efficacy of Fourier analysis of digital retinal images in grading cataract severity.Methods:  A total of 330 eyes from 165 patients were divided i...

Back to Top