Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry

View through CrossRef
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL power calculation. Methods: This retrospective analysis of 67 eyes of 49 patients with previous anterior chamber pIOL implantation analyzed the accuracy of automatic segmentation of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and its impact on anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from epithelium to lens), lens thickness measurements, and IOL power calculation. The sample was divided into two groups: correct detection of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and inaccurate detection. Segmentation of eyes from the inaccurate detection group was manually corrected and ACD and lens thickness were calculated using ImageJ software. IOL power was calculated using 7 formulas for both measurements. Results: The anterior surface of the crystalline lens was mis-identified in 13 (19.4%) eyes. ACD was underestimated (Δ −0.85 ± 0.33 mm, P < .001) and lens thickness was overestimated (Δ +0.81 ± 0.25 mm, P < .001). Manual correction changed the target spherical equivalent only in the Haigis formula ( P = .009). After correction for segmentation bias, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO 2.0 formulas showed the lowest prediction error, with the Pearl DGS showing greatest accuracy within ±1.00 diopters of prediction error range (81.0%). Conclusions: SS-OCT biometry misidentifies the anterior surface of the crystalline lens in a significant proportion, resulting in significant IOL power calculation error in the Haigis formula. Manual proofing of segmentation is mandatory in every patient with anterior chamber pIOL implantation. After correct segmentation, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO seem to be the best formulas. [ J Refract Surg . 2024;40(8):e562–e568.]
Title: Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry
Description:
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL power calculation.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of 67 eyes of 49 patients with previous anterior chamber pIOL implantation analyzed the accuracy of automatic segmentation of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and its impact on anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from epithelium to lens), lens thickness measurements, and IOL power calculation.
The sample was divided into two groups: correct detection of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and inaccurate detection.
Segmentation of eyes from the inaccurate detection group was manually corrected and ACD and lens thickness were calculated using ImageJ software.
IOL power was calculated using 7 formulas for both measurements.
Results: The anterior surface of the crystalline lens was mis-identified in 13 (19.
4%) eyes.
ACD was underestimated (Δ −0.
85 ± 0.
33 mm, P < .
001) and lens thickness was overestimated (Δ +0.
81 ± 0.
25 mm, P < .
001).
Manual correction changed the target spherical equivalent only in the Haigis formula ( P = .
009).
After correction for segmentation bias, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO 2.
0 formulas showed the lowest prediction error, with the Pearl DGS showing greatest accuracy within ±1.
00 diopters of prediction error range (81.
0%).
Conclusions: SS-OCT biometry misidentifies the anterior surface of the crystalline lens in a significant proportion, resulting in significant IOL power calculation error in the Haigis formula.
Manual proofing of segmentation is mandatory in every patient with anterior chamber pIOL implantation.
After correct segmentation, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO seem to be the best formulas.
[ J Refract Surg .
2024;40(8):e562–e568.
].

Related Results

Morphometric OCT parameters of the lens under accommodative stimulus. Report 1. Assessment of age-related changes
Morphometric OCT parameters of the lens under accommodative stimulus. Report 1. Assessment of age-related changes
Introduction. The structural approach to studying the mechanism of accommodation and its age-related changes focuses on analyzing morphometric parameters (size, shape, and position...
Interpretation of Simulated Falloff Tests
Interpretation of Simulated Falloff Tests
Abstract A study was made of the method for determination of swept volume and the proper average temperature to use for interpretation of combustion falloff data ...
EN FACE IMAGING OF RETINAL ARTERY MACROANEURYSMS USING SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
EN FACE IMAGING OF RETINAL ARTERY MACROANEURYSMS USING SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
Purpose: To describe the advantages of en face view with swept-source optical coherence tomography in assessing the morphologic features of retinal arterial macroaneury...
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Forward Swept Wing in Subsonic Speed
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Forward Swept Wing in Subsonic Speed
A forward swept wing was designed to use for a supersonic aircraft. Its aerodynamic characteristics were studied through experiments and numerical simulations which excluded the su...
Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Using Optical and Ultrasound Biometry in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Using Optical and Ultrasound Biometry in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
Background: Accurate biometry is critical for optimal visual outcomes in cataract surgery. Both optical and ultrasound biometry are widely used, but their comparative effectiveness...

Back to Top