Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Monitoring The Mitsue Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood-Program Design, Implementation And Preliminary Results
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The first two of three stages of a horizontal hydrocarbon miscible flood (HCMF) project have been implemented at the Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No.1, in Slave Lake, Alberta. Stage I was started up in May 1985 while the second stage commenced in May 1986. Stages 1 and 2 cover an area of 12500 ha with an original-oil-in-place of 57.2 × 106 m3. A project of this magnitude requires careful monitoring if the unit's technical and economic goals are to be achieved.
A comprehensive monitoring program was developed to provide the data needed to evaluate and optimize flood performance. The program includes fluid sampling and analysis, tracer injection and analysis, pressure and profile surveys, numerical simulation, a data management system, and an observation well. This paper describes the monitoring program and the rationale for its different facets. The program for the surface sampling a produced well effluent is presented. Details are provided on the selection of five radioactive and two chemical tracers and the procedures used for their injection.
In this tertiary project, produced fluid compositional changes are shown to be more reliable for estimating solvent breakthrough dates than GOR. Based on solvent breakthrough data to date, a correlation of solvent-oil ratio (SOR) to GOR was developed. The tracer breakthrough data are presented and analyzed. The tracer breakthrough data confirm that gravity override is taking place in the reservoir and, also suggest that the solvent is sweeping more than one sand layer. The implications of the tracer analysis results on reservoir continuity within the project area, areal sweep efficiency and on flood performance are discussed.
Introduction
The Mitsue Gilwood ‘A’ Pool was discovered in 1964. It is a sandstone reservoir, located 200 km northwest of the City of Edmonton, Alberta, near the town of Slave Lake (Fig. 1). It is a large pool, extending over an area of 48 000 ha or 475 km2 with an original oil-in-place of approximately 160 × 106 m3. The Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No. 1 commenced an HCMF in most of the waterflood swept areas of the unit in May 1985.
Reservoir Geology
The Gilwood sandstones are part of the Middle Devonian Watt Mountain Formation(l). The sands were deposited in a fluvial environment. This shallow dipping pool was formed by a stratigraphic trap (Fig. 2) with an extensive aquifer system located on the downdip, western edge. From depositional studies, the sands are divided into three groups-lower, middle and upper sands. The lower sands (layer 3) contribute less than 5% of the pool's reserves. They are made up of fine-grained, primarily non-channel, lower-meander reach and strand plain deposits. The lower sands are considered nonfloodable by the HCMF. The middle and upper sands (layers 1 and 2) are primarily channel deposits. The middle sands were deposited in the braided to coarse-grained meander reach of a fluvial system while the upper sands were deposited in the fine-grained braided to lower-meander reach regions of another fluvial system.
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Title: Monitoring The Mitsue Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood-Program Design, Implementation And Preliminary Results
Description:
Abstract
The first two of three stages of a horizontal hydrocarbon miscible flood (HCMF) project have been implemented at the Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No.
1, in Slave Lake, Alberta.
Stage I was started up in May 1985 while the second stage commenced in May 1986.
Stages 1 and 2 cover an area of 12500 ha with an original-oil-in-place of 57.
2 × 106 m3.
A project of this magnitude requires careful monitoring if the unit's technical and economic goals are to be achieved.
A comprehensive monitoring program was developed to provide the data needed to evaluate and optimize flood performance.
The program includes fluid sampling and analysis, tracer injection and analysis, pressure and profile surveys, numerical simulation, a data management system, and an observation well.
This paper describes the monitoring program and the rationale for its different facets.
The program for the surface sampling a produced well effluent is presented.
Details are provided on the selection of five radioactive and two chemical tracers and the procedures used for their injection.
In this tertiary project, produced fluid compositional changes are shown to be more reliable for estimating solvent breakthrough dates than GOR.
Based on solvent breakthrough data to date, a correlation of solvent-oil ratio (SOR) to GOR was developed.
The tracer breakthrough data are presented and analyzed.
The tracer breakthrough data confirm that gravity override is taking place in the reservoir and, also suggest that the solvent is sweeping more than one sand layer.
The implications of the tracer analysis results on reservoir continuity within the project area, areal sweep efficiency and on flood performance are discussed.
Introduction
The Mitsue Gilwood ‘A’ Pool was discovered in 1964.
It is a sandstone reservoir, located 200 km northwest of the City of Edmonton, Alberta, near the town of Slave Lake (Fig.
1).
It is a large pool, extending over an area of 48 000 ha or 475 km2 with an original oil-in-place of approximately 160 × 106 m3.
The Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No.
1 commenced an HCMF in most of the waterflood swept areas of the unit in May 1985.
Reservoir Geology
The Gilwood sandstones are part of the Middle Devonian Watt Mountain Formation(l).
The sands were deposited in a fluvial environment.
This shallow dipping pool was formed by a stratigraphic trap (Fig.
2) with an extensive aquifer system located on the downdip, western edge.
From depositional studies, the sands are divided into three groups-lower, middle and upper sands.
The lower sands (layer 3) contribute less than 5% of the pool's reserves.
They are made up of fine-grained, primarily non-channel, lower-meander reach and strand plain deposits.
The lower sands are considered nonfloodable by the HCMF.
The middle and upper sands (layers 1 and 2) are primarily channel deposits.
The middle sands were deposited in the braided to coarse-grained meander reach of a fluvial system while the upper sands were deposited in the fine-grained braided to lower-meander reach regions of another fluvial system.
Related Results
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Summary.
A large-scale hydrocarbon miscible flood has been designed and is being conducted in the Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No. 1 in Alberta, Canada. The horizonta...
Review of BP's Global Gas Injection Projects
Review of BP's Global Gas Injection Projects
Abstract
Miscible gas flooding is an established method for enhancing oil recovery that can be successfully deployed in secondary or tertiary mode. BP has developed ...
Fractal Methods Improve Mitsue Miscible Predictions
Fractal Methods Improve Mitsue Miscible Predictions
Summary
A reservoir modeling technique based on fractal geostatistics was used to interpret the displacement processes and to predict the response to a miscible-h...
Dynamic Field Division of Hydrocarbon Migration, Accumulation and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Rules in Sedimentary Basins
Dynamic Field Division of Hydrocarbon Migration, Accumulation and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Rules in Sedimentary Basins
Abstract:Hydrocarbon distribution rules in the deep and shallow parts of sedimentary basins are considerably different, particularly in the following four aspects. First, the criti...
Evaluation of Miscible Water Alternating Gas WAG Injection by Comparing with Lesson Learnt from an Immiscible Gas Injection Pilot
Evaluation of Miscible Water Alternating Gas WAG Injection by Comparing with Lesson Learnt from an Immiscible Gas Injection Pilot
Abstract
To sustain the long term production from a giant offshore reservoir, a simulation study evaluating and comparing miscible hydrocarbon (HC) Water-Alternating...
ASP Flood After a Polymer Flood vs. ASP Flood After a Water Flood
ASP Flood After a Polymer Flood vs. ASP Flood After a Water Flood
Abstract
Alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding is an effective technique to improve oil recovery. It has been applied typically after a water flood. Recently, t...
Probabilistic Flood Hazard Maps at Ungauged Locations Using Multivariate Extreme Values Approach
Probabilistic Flood Hazard Maps at Ungauged Locations Using Multivariate Extreme Values Approach
<p>Flood hazard maps are essential for development and assessment of flood risk management strategies. Conventionally, flood hazard assessment is based on determinist...
Physical Model of the West Willmar Rich Gas Pilot
Physical Model of the West Willmar Rich Gas Pilot
Abstract
A physical model of the West Willmar Frobisher Beds reservoir in southeastern Saskatchewan has been developed by assembling 31 core plugs into a 1.5-metr...

