Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fluid–Structure Interaction Aortic Valve Surgery Simulation: A Review
View through CrossRef
The complicated interaction between a fluid flow and a deformable structure is referred to as fluid–structure interaction (FSI). FSI plays a crucial role in the functioning of the aortic valve. Blood exerts stresses on the leaflets as it passes through the opening or shutting valve, causing them to distort and vibrate. The pressure, velocity, and turbulence of the fluid flow have an impact on these deformations and vibrations. Designing artificial valves, diagnosing and predicting valve failure, and improving surgical and interventional treatments all require the understanding and modeling of FSI in aortic valve dynamics. The most popular techniques for simulating and analyzing FSI in aortic valves are computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element analysis (FEA). By studying the relationship between fluid flow and valve deformations, researchers and doctors can gain knowledge about the functioning of valves and possible pathological diseases. Overall, FSI is a complicated phenomenon that has a great impact on how well the aortic valve works. Aortic valve diseases and disorders can be better identified, treated, and managed by comprehending and mimicking this relationship. This article provides a literature review that compiles valve reconstruction methods from 1952 to the present, as well as FSI modeling techniques that can help advance valve reconstruction. The Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases were used in the literature search and were structured into several categories. By utilizing FSI modeling, surgeons, researchers, and engineers can predict the behavior of the aortic valve before, during, and after surgery. This predictive capability can contribute to improved surgical planning, as it provides valuable insights into hemodynamic parameters such as blood flow patterns, pressure distributions, and stress analysis. Additionally, FSI modeling can aid in the evaluation of different treatment options and surgical techniques, allowing for the assessment of potential complications and the optimization of surgical outcomes. It can also provide valuable information on the long-term durability and functionality of prosthetic valves. In summary, fluid–structure interaction modeling is an effective tool for predicting the outcomes of aortic valve surgery. It can provide valuable insights into hemodynamic parameters and aid in surgical planning, treatment evaluation, and the optimization of surgical outcomes.
Title: Fluid–Structure Interaction Aortic Valve Surgery Simulation: A Review
Description:
The complicated interaction between a fluid flow and a deformable structure is referred to as fluid–structure interaction (FSI).
FSI plays a crucial role in the functioning of the aortic valve.
Blood exerts stresses on the leaflets as it passes through the opening or shutting valve, causing them to distort and vibrate.
The pressure, velocity, and turbulence of the fluid flow have an impact on these deformations and vibrations.
Designing artificial valves, diagnosing and predicting valve failure, and improving surgical and interventional treatments all require the understanding and modeling of FSI in aortic valve dynamics.
The most popular techniques for simulating and analyzing FSI in aortic valves are computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element analysis (FEA).
By studying the relationship between fluid flow and valve deformations, researchers and doctors can gain knowledge about the functioning of valves and possible pathological diseases.
Overall, FSI is a complicated phenomenon that has a great impact on how well the aortic valve works.
Aortic valve diseases and disorders can be better identified, treated, and managed by comprehending and mimicking this relationship.
This article provides a literature review that compiles valve reconstruction methods from 1952 to the present, as well as FSI modeling techniques that can help advance valve reconstruction.
The Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases were used in the literature search and were structured into several categories.
By utilizing FSI modeling, surgeons, researchers, and engineers can predict the behavior of the aortic valve before, during, and after surgery.
This predictive capability can contribute to improved surgical planning, as it provides valuable insights into hemodynamic parameters such as blood flow patterns, pressure distributions, and stress analysis.
Additionally, FSI modeling can aid in the evaluation of different treatment options and surgical techniques, allowing for the assessment of potential complications and the optimization of surgical outcomes.
It can also provide valuable information on the long-term durability and functionality of prosthetic valves.
In summary, fluid–structure interaction modeling is an effective tool for predicting the outcomes of aortic valve surgery.
It can provide valuable insights into hemodynamic parameters and aid in surgical planning, treatment evaluation, and the optimization of surgical outcomes.
Related Results
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
Techniques of Aortic Valve Repair
Techniques of Aortic Valve Repair
Similar to mitral repair, newer methods of aortic valve reconstruction are achieving excellent outcomes with an 85% to 90% freedom from valve-related complications at 10 years. The...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can
occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross
procedure, and connective tissue disease (CTD). Val...
Small Aortic Annulus: Aortic Allografts vs Perceval S
Small Aortic Annulus: Aortic Allografts vs Perceval S
Цель. Оценить и сравнить гемодинамические показатели и изменение качества жизни после имплантации протезов Perceval S и аортальных аллографтов, а также частоту и спектр осложнений ...
An Acoustically Controlled Down-Hole Safety Valve (SCSSSV)
An Acoustically Controlled Down-Hole Safety Valve (SCSSSV)
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
Abstract
A surface-controlled subsurface safety valve...
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of Valve-in-valve (ViV) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease be...
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
AbstractRecent echocardiographic studies described that almost 30% of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relative...
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
Evaluation of aortic regurgitation requires consideration of valve morphology, mechanism and severity of regurgitation and assessment of aortic dilatation. In asymptomatic patients...

