Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Piotr Czyżewski’s “Alfurkan tatarski” (Wilno, 1616/1617) and its Authorship
View through CrossRef
The article focuses on the textual characteristics of the Polish anti-Ta- tar pamphlet “Alfurkan tatarski” written by Piotr Czyżewski (Wilno, 1616/1617) and reveals its text being a compilation. There are at least four different indica- tions for this. They were a result of borrowing certain textual fragments from Matiasz Czyżewski’s earlier edition “Alkoran” (1616), which is considered lost. However, its long title describing the contents survives and can be safely com- pared to the extant text of Piotr Czyżewski’s “Alfurkan tatarski”. This comparison reveals thematic similarities between the two editions accompanied by identical wording which must be viewed as result of textual borrowing from the earlier edition into the later one. This collaborates well with A. Brückner’s comparison of the two editions (both were available to him in the early 20th century) which were reported to contain partially the same textual material.
Traditionally the names of both authors are treated as pseudonyms of an un- known person who was recently identified with Józef Karcan (the printer of Piotr Czyżewski’s first edition of “Alfurkan tatarski”) or, alternatively, with Tomasz Pawłowski (the abbot of the Benedictine monastery in Old Trakai in ca 1597 – ca 1617). Nevertheless, the very nature of the revealed textual bor- rowings, accompanied by a significant rearrangement of the general struc
ture, suggests that both editions have different authors. Since Matiasz and Piotr Czyżewski in their publications call themselves brothers and mention each other’s editions, they, contrary to the established tradition, must be con- sidered the actual authors of the respective printed books, and not fictitious pseudonyms.
Title: Piotr Czyżewski’s “Alfurkan tatarski” (Wilno, 1616/1617) and its Authorship
Description:
The article focuses on the textual characteristics of the Polish anti-Ta- tar pamphlet “Alfurkan tatarski” written by Piotr Czyżewski (Wilno, 1616/1617) and reveals its text being a compilation.
There are at least four different indica- tions for this.
They were a result of borrowing certain textual fragments from Matiasz Czyżewski’s earlier edition “Alkoran” (1616), which is considered lost.
However, its long title describing the contents survives and can be safely com- pared to the extant text of Piotr Czyżewski’s “Alfurkan tatarski”.
This comparison reveals thematic similarities between the two editions accompanied by identical wording which must be viewed as result of textual borrowing from the earlier edition into the later one.
This collaborates well with A.
Brückner’s comparison of the two editions (both were available to him in the early 20th century) which were reported to contain partially the same textual material.
Traditionally the names of both authors are treated as pseudonyms of an un- known person who was recently identified with Józef Karcan (the printer of Piotr Czyżewski’s first edition of “Alfurkan tatarski”) or, alternatively, with Tomasz Pawłowski (the abbot of the Benedictine monastery in Old Trakai in ca 1597 – ca 1617).
Nevertheless, the very nature of the revealed textual bor- rowings, accompanied by a significant rearrangement of the general struc
ture, suggests that both editions have different authors.
Since Matiasz and Piotr Czyżewski in their publications call themselves brothers and mention each other’s editions, they, contrary to the established tradition, must be con- sidered the actual authors of the respective printed books, and not fictitious pseudonyms.
.
Related Results
Problem autorstwa siedemnastowiecznego paszkwilu Alfurkan tatarski: wątpliwości i ustalenia
Problem autorstwa siedemnastowiecznego paszkwilu Alfurkan tatarski: wątpliwości i ustalenia
W artykule podjęto próbę wskazania autora siedemnastowiecznego paszkwilu wymierzonego przeciwko Tatarom Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego, a ściślej – zamieszkałym nad Waką w wojewódz...
Gift, guest & ghost authorship in biomedical publications: definitions, prevalence, impacts, detection and prevention. Scoping review
Gift, guest & ghost authorship in biomedical publications: definitions, prevalence, impacts, detection and prevention. Scoping review
Abstract
Introduction Inappropriate authorship practices, including gift, guest, and ghost authorship, are a recognized problem in biomedical and basic science publishing. ...
Ethical Issues in Academic Authorship: A Study on Group Writing
Ethical Issues in Academic Authorship: A Study on Group Writing
In the academic world, the authors and the publication of academic writing are inseparable. By publishing academic writing, academicians can improve their performance and increase ...
Alexander Blok in the Russian Environment of Interwar Wilno
Alexander Blok in the Russian Environment of Interwar Wilno
The study of the significance of Alexander Blok and his work in the perceptions of the Russian environment in the interwar Wilno reveals its literary orientations. Blok’s literary ...
Handle with care: authorship challenges and conflicts in research publication
Handle with care: authorship challenges and conflicts in research publication
This review article explores how to determine correct authorship order, addresses disputes among co-authors over authorship credit, identifies misconduct, and offers recommendation...
Gender Authorship Trends in the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature
Gender Authorship Trends in the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature
Purpose:
Despite increasing numbers of women oculoplastic surgeons, they remain underrepresented within the subspecialty. The purpose of this study was to analyze trend...
Closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology/oncology-related randomized controlled trials requires inclusive effort from male and female senior researchers
Closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology/oncology-related randomized controlled trials requires inclusive effort from male and female senior researchers
Abstract
Importance: Severe gender gap in academic research output is pervasive across all medical specialties, including hematology and oncology. Objective: This bibliome...
Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship?
Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship?
While guest or honorary authorship on academic papers is a broadly and widely discussed phenomenon in biomedical research, the issue of the use – or abuse – of article processing c...

