Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology/oncology-related randomized controlled trials requires inclusive effort from male and female senior researchers
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Importance: Severe gender gap in academic research output is pervasive across all medical specialties, including hematology and oncology. Objective: This bibliometric study aimed to investigate the representation of females in premier first and last authorship positions of hematology- and oncology-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000–2022. Additionally, we investigated the trend of females in first authorship positions with a male or female senior author. Design: Bibliometric analysis of clinically oriented hematology and oncology RCTs published between 2000 and 2022 across all PubMed-indexed journals. Participants: First and last authors of 5,891 hematology- and oncology-related RCTs. Main Outcomes: Change in the proportion of female first and senior authors and the proportion of RCTs with the same and cross-gender dyads of first and senior authors. Results: 5,891 RCTs were available with identifiable gender of first and senior authors. A total of 49 countries and 62 journals were represented in our study sample. The proportion of females in our study population was 22.9% (n = 1,349) in the first authorship and 17.5% (n = 1,032) in the senior authorship positions and were predominantly affiliated with institutions in high-income countries (94.1%, n = 1,270 and 95.3%, n = 984). We also noted a significant upward trend in the percentage of female authors in the first authorship position (16.3% in 2000 to 32.4% in 2022, p = 0.001) between 2000 and 2022; the trend was stronger with male than female senior authors. However, the odds of the females in the first authorship position with a female senior author were significantly higher only when both authors came from high-income countries [OR = 1.702 (95%CI 1.461–1.984; p < 0.0001]. The proportion of female senior authors remained stable during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite early trends in closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology- and oncology-related RCTs, females remain severely underrepresented in premier authorship positions. The increasing proportion of female authors in the first authorship position with a male senior author indicated that a more inclusive effort to train, mentor, and encourage young female physician-scientists with the involvement of senior male and female researchers will likely accelerate the overall increase in female authorship.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: Closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology/oncology-related randomized controlled trials requires inclusive effort from male and female senior researchers
Description:
Abstract
Importance: Severe gender gap in academic research output is pervasive across all medical specialties, including hematology and oncology.
Objective: This bibliometric study aimed to investigate the representation of females in premier first and last authorship positions of hematology- and oncology-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000–2022.
Additionally, we investigated the trend of females in first authorship positions with a male or female senior author.
Design: Bibliometric analysis of clinically oriented hematology and oncology RCTs published between 2000 and 2022 across all PubMed-indexed journals.
Participants: First and last authors of 5,891 hematology- and oncology-related RCTs.
Main Outcomes: Change in the proportion of female first and senior authors and the proportion of RCTs with the same and cross-gender dyads of first and senior authors.
Results: 5,891 RCTs were available with identifiable gender of first and senior authors.
A total of 49 countries and 62 journals were represented in our study sample.
The proportion of females in our study population was 22.
9% (n = 1,349) in the first authorship and 17.
5% (n = 1,032) in the senior authorship positions and were predominantly affiliated with institutions in high-income countries (94.
1%, n = 1,270 and 95.
3%, n = 984).
We also noted a significant upward trend in the percentage of female authors in the first authorship position (16.
3% in 2000 to 32.
4% in 2022, p = 0.
001) between 2000 and 2022; the trend was stronger with male than female senior authors.
However, the odds of the females in the first authorship position with a female senior author were significantly higher only when both authors came from high-income countries [OR = 1.
702 (95%CI 1.
461–1.
984; p < 0.
0001].
The proportion of female senior authors remained stable during the study period.
Conclusions and Relevance: Despite early trends in closing the gender gap in the authorship of hematology- and oncology-related RCTs, females remain severely underrepresented in premier authorship positions.
The increasing proportion of female authors in the first authorship position with a male senior author indicated that a more inclusive effort to train, mentor, and encourage young female physician-scientists with the involvement of senior male and female researchers will likely accelerate the overall increase in female authorship.
Related Results
Gender disparity in critical care publications: a novel Female First Author Index
Gender disparity in critical care publications: a novel Female First Author Index
Abstract
Background
Bibliometric analyses show gender bias against women in scientific publications and citations. We hyp...
Changing Faces of Authorship: A Study of Gender, Race, Regional Disparities in Gastroenterology/Hepatology-related RCTs. A Two Decade Analysis (2000-2022)
Changing Faces of Authorship: A Study of Gender, Race, Regional Disparities in Gastroenterology/Hepatology-related RCTs. A Two Decade Analysis (2000-2022)
ABSTRACT
Objective
To investigate gender, racial, ethnic, and regional disparities in first and senior authorship positions in ...
Gender Authorship Trends in the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature
Gender Authorship Trends in the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature
Purpose:
Despite increasing numbers of women oculoplastic surgeons, they remain underrepresented within the subspecialty. The purpose of this study was to analyze trend...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Neuro-oncology authorship trends in gender since 1944: a systematic review of 14,020 articles from five top-tier academic journals
Neuro-oncology authorship trends in gender since 1944: a systematic review of 14,020 articles from five top-tier academic journals
OBJECTIVE
This study was performed to compare authorship trends, by gender, in the neurosurgical oncology literature.
METHODS
Complete author listings for neurosurgical oncology ...
Authorship Equity and Gender Representation in Global Oncology Publications
Authorship Equity and Gender Representation in Global Oncology Publications
PURPOSE Authorship gender disparities persist across academic disciplines, including oncology. However, little is known about global variation in authorship gender distribution. ME...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
How is missing data handled in cluster randomized controlled trials? A review of trials published in the NIHR Journals Library 1997–2024
How is missing data handled in cluster randomized controlled trials? A review of trials published in the NIHR Journals Library 1997–2024
Background:
Cluster randomized controlled trials are increasingly used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in clinical and public health research. Ho...

