Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prevalence and Evaluation of Cosmetically Absorbable and Non Absorbable Sutures in the Management of Traumatic Surgical Wounds

View through CrossRef
Background: The frequency and efficacy of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the treatment of traumatic surgical wounds are investigated in this study. In order to maximize suture selection for better clinical outcomes and fewer issues, it assesses their effects on healing, cosmetic results, and patient satisfaction. Objective: To determine the prevalence of cosmetically absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the management of traumatic surgical wounds. Methodology: This was a randomized control trial carried out at Services Hospital duration of six months and using a calculated sample size of 80 based upon two means of suture infection. Patients aged 20–50 with traumatic surgical wounds in aesthetically sensitive areas such as the face, neck, or hands, in which the cosmetic outcomes were prominent. Results: The study analyzed 80 participants, with 53.8% aged 20–30, 43.8% aged 31–40, and 2.5% aged 41–50. Males comprised 57.5%, females 40.0%, and 2.6% were unspecified. Lacerations were the most common wound type (56.3%), followed by puncture wounds (32.5%) and abrasions (11.3%). Upper extremities were the most affected (46.3%), followed by the head and face (41.3%) and lower extremities (12.5%). Both absorbable and non-absorbable sutures were used equally. No significant correlation was found between suture type and scar appearance (p=0.243) or healing time (p=0.686). However, non-absorbable sutures were associated with significantly higher satisfaction levels (p=0.002). Conclusion: The study found that both absorbable and non-absorbable sutures were equally used in managing traumatic surgical wounds. No significant correlation was observed between suture type and scar appearance (p=0.243) or healing time (p=0.686). However, patient satisfaction significantly favored non-absorbable sutures (p=0.002), with recipients reporting higher levels of happiness compared to those with absorbable sutures.
Title: Prevalence and Evaluation of Cosmetically Absorbable and Non Absorbable Sutures in the Management of Traumatic Surgical Wounds
Description:
Background: The frequency and efficacy of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the treatment of traumatic surgical wounds are investigated in this study.
In order to maximize suture selection for better clinical outcomes and fewer issues, it assesses their effects on healing, cosmetic results, and patient satisfaction.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of cosmetically absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the management of traumatic surgical wounds.
Methodology: This was a randomized control trial carried out at Services Hospital duration of six months and using a calculated sample size of 80 based upon two means of suture infection.
Patients aged 20–50 with traumatic surgical wounds in aesthetically sensitive areas such as the face, neck, or hands, in which the cosmetic outcomes were prominent.
Results: The study analyzed 80 participants, with 53.
8% aged 20–30, 43.
8% aged 31–40, and 2.
5% aged 41–50.
Males comprised 57.
5%, females 40.
0%, and 2.
6% were unspecified.
Lacerations were the most common wound type (56.
3%), followed by puncture wounds (32.
5%) and abrasions (11.
3%).
Upper extremities were the most affected (46.
3%), followed by the head and face (41.
3%) and lower extremities (12.
5%).
Both absorbable and non-absorbable sutures were used equally.
No significant correlation was found between suture type and scar appearance (p=0.
243) or healing time (p=0.
686).
However, non-absorbable sutures were associated with significantly higher satisfaction levels (p=0.
002).
Conclusion: The study found that both absorbable and non-absorbable sutures were equally used in managing traumatic surgical wounds.
No significant correlation was observed between suture type and scar appearance (p=0.
243) or healing time (p=0.
686).
However, patient satisfaction significantly favored non-absorbable sutures (p=0.
002), with recipients reporting higher levels of happiness compared to those with absorbable sutures.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Groin hernia repair : evaluation of clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
Groin hernia repair : evaluation of clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
<p dir="ltr">AIMS</p><p dir="ltr">The project underlying this thesis aimed to identify and quantify relative risk differences in reoperation rate (Papers I and II...
Groin hernia repair : evaluation of clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
Groin hernia repair : evaluation of clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
<p dir="ltr">AIMS</p><p dir="ltr">The project underlying this thesis aimed to identify and quantify relative risk differences in reoperation rate (Papers I and II...
Hernia surgery : evaluation of the clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
Hernia surgery : evaluation of the clinical impacts and interactions of mesh and mesh fixation
<p dir="ltr">AIMS</p><p dir="ltr">The project underlying this thesis aimed to identify and quantify relative risk differences in reoperation rate (Papers I and II...
COMPARISON TENSILE STRENGTH OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE SUTURES
COMPARISON TENSILE STRENGTH OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC ABSORBABLE SUTURES
Objective: The aim of the investigation is to evaluate and to compare the tensile strength of commercial natural and synthetic absorbable suturematerials currently used in surgery....
Use of Absorbable Cutaneous Sutures Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Use of Absorbable Cutaneous Sutures Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
The use of absorbable epicuticular sutures is highlighted as a measure to decrease the number of patient visits, eliminating the risk of additional exposures for patients and medic...
Comparison of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures used for skin closure in lower segment cesarean section.
Comparison of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures used for skin closure in lower segment cesarean section.
Objective: To compare postoperative wound infection, operative time, and blood loss in women undergoing cesarean section using absorbable (Monocryl) versus non-absorbable (Prolene)...
Survey on Prevalence and Impact of Chronic Non-Healing Wounds among Patients Attending Various Wound Clinics Around Trivandrum City
Survey on Prevalence and Impact of Chronic Non-Healing Wounds among Patients Attending Various Wound Clinics Around Trivandrum City
The survey on prevailing medical practices for non-healing chronic wounds and its impact provides valuable insights into the management and treatment strategies adopted in the cont...

Back to Top