Javascript must be enabled to continue!
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a popular practice in most centers with the introduction of the technique of minimally invasive surgery. Nevertheless, open appendectomy remains very common in low- and middle-income nations as a result of resource shortages.
Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, complications and pain scores between laparoscopic appendectomy and an open appendectomy.
Material and Method: A prospective observational comparative study was carried out in Department of surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2024 to December 2024. One hundred patients (aged 18 years or older) having acute appendicitis were included (50 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy and 50 cases of open appendectomy). The information concerning demographic data, operative data, postoperative complications, pain measurements (VAS), and length of stay was collected and compared.
Results: The mean age of patients was 28.4 ± 10.2 in the laparoscopic group and 30.7 ± 11.5 in the open group. The laparoscopic cases took a lot less time during the operation (45.3 +/- 9.6 minutes), as compared to Open surgery cases (60.1 ± 12.8 minutes). Laparoscopic patients had a shorter length of stay (2.1 ± 0.8 days) compared with those undergoing sharp appendectomy (3.2 ± 1.1 days). The incidences of postoperative wound infections were less in the laparoscopic (6%) than in the open group (18%).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy due to decreased operating time, less operative morbidity, fewer complications, shorter stay and less postoperative pain. It should be promoted as the method of choice in surgery to be performed in tertiary care facilities in Pakistan, and work should be put into increasing the availability of laparoscopic facilities.
Insightful Education Research Institute
Title: <b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Description:
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment.
Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a popular practice in most centers with the introduction of the technique of minimally invasive surgery.
Nevertheless, open appendectomy remains very common in low- and middle-income nations as a result of resource shortages.
Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, complications and pain scores between laparoscopic appendectomy and an open appendectomy.
Material and Method: A prospective observational comparative study was carried out in Department of surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2024 to December 2024.
One hundred patients (aged 18 years or older) having acute appendicitis were included (50 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy and 50 cases of open appendectomy).
The information concerning demographic data, operative data, postoperative complications, pain measurements (VAS), and length of stay was collected and compared.
Results: The mean age of patients was 28.
4 ± 10.
2 in the laparoscopic group and 30.
7 ± 11.
5 in the open group.
The laparoscopic cases took a lot less time during the operation (45.
3 +/- 9.
6 minutes), as compared to Open surgery cases (60.
1 ± 12.
8 minutes).
Laparoscopic patients had a shorter length of stay (2.
1 ± 0.
8 days) compared with those undergoing sharp appendectomy (3.
2 ± 1.
1 days).
The incidences of postoperative wound infections were less in the laparoscopic (6%) than in the open group (18%).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy due to decreased operating time, less operative morbidity, fewer complications, shorter stay and less postoperative pain.
It should be promoted as the method of choice in surgery to be performed in tertiary care facilities in Pakistan, and work should be put into increasing the availability of laparoscopic facilities.
.
Related Results
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surge...
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with ...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.
Study Design: Randomized control trial.
Place and duratio...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Objectives: The objective of this study were to compare the effectiveness of lateral transverse cosmetic incision (LTCI) versus laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operative and ...
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical emergencies for appendicitis. Despite the improvemen...
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholecystolithiasis. The critical view of safety is a generally accepted ...
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has rapidly evolved into the technique of choice compared with open splenectomy (OS) because of the advantages of the minimally invasive approach. Spl...
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objectives: To compare post-operative pain, analgesic requirements, complications, hospital stay, and recovery outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
Methodology: Thi...

