Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Oxidation of triaryl antimony Ar3Sb [Ar = 4-FC6H4, (4-F3C)C6H4, (2-MeO)C6H4, 4-BrC6H4, 3-MeC6H4, 4-MeC6H4, (4-Me2N)C6H4, (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3] with benzoyl peroxide
View through CrossRef
Oxidation of triarylantimony Ar3Sb with benzoyl peroxide in benzene gave the correspond-ing dibenzoates Ar3Sb[OC(O)Ph]2 [Ar = 4-FC6H4 (1), (4-F3C)C6H4 (2), (2-MeO)C6H4 (3), 4-BrC6H4 (4), 3-MeC6H4 (5), 4-MeC6H4 (6), (4-Me2N)C6H4 (7), (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3] (8) with yield up to 93%. Compounds 1–8 were identified by IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, while compounds 1 and 2 were identified by X-ray analysis. According to X-ray diffraction data, carried out on a Bruker D8 QUEST diffractometer, the crystallographic unit cell parameters of the compounds are: 1, space group P-1, a = 9.1154(3), b = 11.0918(3), c = 14.5437(4) Å, α = 69.9850(10)°, β = 87.5980(10)°, γ = 89.8020(10)°, V = 1380.34(7) Å3, ρcalc = 1.562 g/cm3, Z = 1. F(000) = 648.0, 2θ 5.96–52.88°, crystal dimensions 0.29 0.2 0.2 mm, intervals of re-flection indices 11 h 11, 13 k 13, 18 l 18, total reflections 31527, independent re-flections 11156, refinement variables 721, GOOF 1.069, R1 = 0.0265, wR2 = 0.0549; 2, space group Р-1, а = 10.944(7), b = 12.548(9), c = 13.730(14) Å, α = 83.52(4)°, β = 82.34(5)°, γ = 64.52(3)°, V = 1684(2) Å3, ρcalc = 1.577 g/cm3, Z = 2, F(000) = 792.0, 2θ 4.88–59.22°, crystal dimensions 0.320.280.19 mm, reflection index intervals 14 h 14, 17 k 16, 18 l 18, total reflections 44329, independent reflections 8289, refinement variables 442, GOOF 1.053, R1 = 0.0482, wR2 = 0.1287. Crystals 1 consist of two types of crystallographically independent molecules (A and B), the geometrical parameters of which slightly differ from each other. Antimony atoms in 1 and 2 have a trigonal pyramid coordination with benzoate ligands in axial positions. The Sb–C bond lengths are 2.042(11), 2.081(11), 2.143(9) Å for 1A, 2.091(10), 2.146(11), 2.162(9) Å for 1B, and 2.134(5), 2.135(4), 2.142(4) Å for 2. The Sb–O distances are 2.117(7), 2.128(8) Å for 1A, 2.117(7), 2.128(8) Å for 1B, and 2.127(3), 2.133(3) Å for 2; however, metal atoms are also coordinated by the carbonyl oxygen atoms of bidentate carboxylate ligands [the Sb∙∙∙O=C distances vary in the ranges of 2.669(9)–2.876(9) Å]. The CSbC equatorial angles are not equivalent: the largest angle is observed on the side of intramolecular contacts [103.6(5), 109.0(4), 147.2(4)° for 1A, 105.0(4), 108.1( 4), 146.6(4)° for 1B and 104.39(17), 105.33(17), 150.21(16)° for 2]. The OSbO axial angles are 175.3(4), 176.0(4), and 175.10(10), respectively.
FSAEIHE South Ural State University (National Research University)
Title: Oxidation of triaryl antimony Ar3Sb [Ar = 4-FC6H4, (4-F3C)C6H4, (2-MeO)C6H4, 4-BrC6H4, 3-MeC6H4, 4-MeC6H4, (4-Me2N)C6H4, (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3] with benzoyl peroxide
Description:
Oxidation of triarylantimony Ar3Sb with benzoyl peroxide in benzene gave the correspond-ing dibenzoates Ar3Sb[OC(O)Ph]2 [Ar = 4-FC6H4 (1), (4-F3C)C6H4 (2), (2-MeO)C6H4 (3), 4-BrC6H4 (4), 3-MeC6H4 (5), 4-MeC6H4 (6), (4-Me2N)C6H4 (7), (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3] (8) with yield up to 93%.
Compounds 1–8 were identified by IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, while compounds 1 and 2 were identified by X-ray analysis.
According to X-ray diffraction data, carried out on a Bruker D8 QUEST diffractometer, the crystallographic unit cell parameters of the compounds are: 1, space group P-1, a = 9.
1154(3), b = 11.
0918(3), c = 14.
5437(4) Å, α = 69.
9850(10)°, β = 87.
5980(10)°, γ = 89.
8020(10)°, V = 1380.
34(7) Å3, ρcalc = 1.
562 g/cm3, Z = 1.
F(000) = 648.
0, 2θ 5.
96–52.
88°, crystal dimensions 0.
29 0.
2 0.
2 mm, intervals of re-flection indices 11 h 11, 13 k 13, 18 l 18, total reflections 31527, independent re-flections 11156, refinement variables 721, GOOF 1.
069, R1 = 0.
0265, wR2 = 0.
0549; 2, space group Р-1, а = 10.
944(7), b = 12.
548(9), c = 13.
730(14) Å, α = 83.
52(4)°, β = 82.
34(5)°, γ = 64.
52(3)°, V = 1684(2) Å3, ρcalc = 1.
577 g/cm3, Z = 2, F(000) = 792.
0, 2θ 4.
88–59.
22°, crystal dimensions 0.
320.
280.
19 mm, reflection index intervals 14 h 14, 17 k 16, 18 l 18, total reflections 44329, independent reflections 8289, refinement variables 442, GOOF 1.
053, R1 = 0.
0482, wR2 = 0.
1287.
Crystals 1 consist of two types of crystallographically independent molecules (A and B), the geometrical parameters of which slightly differ from each other.
Antimony atoms in 1 and 2 have a trigonal pyramid coordination with benzoate ligands in axial positions.
The Sb–C bond lengths are 2.
042(11), 2.
081(11), 2.
143(9) Å for 1A, 2.
091(10), 2.
146(11), 2.
162(9) Å for 1B, and 2.
134(5), 2.
135(4), 2.
142(4) Å for 2.
The Sb–O distances are 2.
117(7), 2.
128(8) Å for 1A, 2.
117(7), 2.
128(8) Å for 1B, and 2.
127(3), 2.
133(3) Å for 2; however, metal atoms are also coordinated by the carbonyl oxygen atoms of bidentate carboxylate ligands [the Sb∙∙∙O=C distances vary in the ranges of 2.
669(9)–2.
876(9) Å].
The CSbC equatorial angles are not equivalent: the largest angle is observed on the side of intramolecular contacts [103.
6(5), 109.
0(4), 147.
2(4)° for 1A, 105.
0(4), 108.
1( 4), 146.
6(4)° for 1B and 104.
39(17), 105.
33(17), 150.
21(16)° for 2].
The OSbO axial angles are 175.
3(4), 176.
0(4), and 175.
10(10), respectively.
Related Results
Structure of Organoantimony Compounds [C5H4Mn(CO)3]Sb, (4-Me2NC6H4)3SbI2, Ph3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2, (3-MeC6H4)3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2xPhH, and (3-FC6H4)3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2xPhH
Structure of Organoantimony Compounds [C5H4Mn(CO)3]Sb, (4-Me2NC6H4)3SbI2, Ph3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2, (3-MeC6H4)3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2xPhH, and (3-FC6H4)3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2xPhH
The structure of five organoantimony compounds [C5H4Mn(CO)3]Sb (1), (4-Me2NC6H4)3SbI2 (2), Ph3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2 (3), (3-MeC6H4)3Sb[OC(O)C6H3(NO2)2-3,5]2PhH (4), and (3-FC6H...
Synthesis, Structures, and Some Reactions of [(Thioacyl)thio]‐ and (Acylseleno)antimony and ‐bismuth Derivatives ((RCSS)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ and (RCOSe)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ with M = Sb, Bi and x = 1–3)
Synthesis, Structures, and Some Reactions of [(Thioacyl)thio]‐ and (Acylseleno)antimony and ‐bismuth Derivatives ((RCSS)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ and (RCOSe)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ with M = Sb, Bi and x = 1–3)
AbstractA series of [(thioacyl)thio]‐ and (acylseleno)antimony and [(thioacyl)thio]‐ and (acylseleno)bismuth, i.e., (RCSS)xMR$\rm{_{3 - x}^1 }$ and (RCOSe)xMR$\rm{_{3 - x}^1 }$ (M ...
Is China's Antimony Resource Advantage Diminishing?
Is China's Antimony Resource Advantage Diminishing?
Antimony, as a critical raw metal, is considered a strategic mineral resource to China. However, in recent years, China's antimony ore production has significantly decline...
Dialkylamino‐phosphane, V. Dimethylamino‐phosphane als Komplexliganden
Dialkylamino‐phosphane, V. Dimethylamino‐phosphane als Komplexliganden
AbstractP(NMe2)3 und PhP(NMe2)2 reagieren mit CdJ2 bzw. HgJ2 zu den Koordinationsverbindungen [(Me2N)3P]2·CdJ2, [(Me2N)3P·CdJ2]2, [(Me2N)3P]2·HgJ2, [(Me2N)3P·HgJ2]2, [PhP(NMe2)2]2·...
Structural features of triarylantimony derivatives Ph3Sb(OC6H3F2-2,4)2 and Ar3Sb[OC(O)R]2 [Ar = Ph, R = CHF2, Ar = 2-MeOC6H4, R = C6H3F2-2,5, Ar = 3-CF3C6H4, R = Ph, Ar = (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3, R = C6H3F2-2,3]
Structural features of triarylantimony derivatives Ph3Sb(OC6H3F2-2,4)2 and Ar3Sb[OC(O)R]2 [Ar = Ph, R = CHF2, Ar = 2-MeOC6H4, R = C6H3F2-2,5, Ar = 3-CF3C6H4, R = Ph, Ar = (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H3, R = C6H3F2-2,3]
Triarylantimony derivatives Ph3Sb(OC6H3F2-2,4)2 (1) and Ar3Sb[OC(O)R]2 [Ar = Ph, R = CHF2 (2), Ar = 2-MeOC6H4, R = C6H3F2-2,5 (3), Ar = 3-CF3C6H4, R = Ph (4), Ar = (2-MeO)(5-Br)C6H...
Study Drug Avaibility at the Meo-Meo Health Center in the City of Baubau
Study Drug Avaibility at the Meo-Meo Health Center in the City of Baubau
Planning and procurement of medicine phases is part of that was important in meet the needs of medication at health. For puskesmas Meo-Meo, a problem which often happened that is t...
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF TOPICAL TAZAROTENE 0.1% CREAM VS ADEPALENE 0.3% AND BENZOYL PEROXIDE 2.5% IN TREATING ATROPHIC ACNE SCARS
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF TOPICAL TAZAROTENE 0.1% CREAM VS ADEPALENE 0.3% AND BENZOYL PEROXIDE 2.5% IN TREATING ATROPHIC ACNE SCARS
Atrophic acne scars are a common dermatological concern that significantly impacts patients' self-esteem and quality of life. Topical treatments such as Tazarotene and combinations...
Oxidation Kinetics Analysis of Crude Oils with Different Viscosities
Oxidation Kinetics Analysis of Crude Oils with Different Viscosities
In order to compare the oxidation kinetics parameters of crude oils with different properties in the process of crude oil oxidation, six different crude oil samples were selected t...

