Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A cross-linguistic corpus acoustic analysis of rhotics
View through CrossRef
Cross-linguistically, rhotics exhibits a wide range of pronunciation variation, especially word-finally. The languages compared in this study include Turkish, Uzbek, Kazakh, Farsi, Russian, Romanian, Macedonian, Czech, Irish, and Mexican Spanish, which all have been described as having a fricative-like variant of their rhotic(s). Previous research has reported a word-final devoiced and fricated alveolar tap for Turkish and Uzbek; dentalized alveolar trill and voiced uvular fricative for Kazakh; alveolar trill, approximant, and tap which may be fricated word-finally for Farsi; alveolar and palatalized trill for Russian and Romanian; alveolar trill for Macedonian; alveolar trill with a fricated variant for Czech; palatalized tap which may be fricated for Irish; and alveolar tap with a fricated variant for Mexican Spanish. The data used for this cross-linguistic corpus study is from the Mozilla Common Voice corpus. This exploratory analysis will examine spectral differences within and across languages for each rhotic. The results of this study aim to assess the range of descriptions used for rhotics and their variants.
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Title: A cross-linguistic corpus acoustic analysis of rhotics
Description:
Cross-linguistically, rhotics exhibits a wide range of pronunciation variation, especially word-finally.
The languages compared in this study include Turkish, Uzbek, Kazakh, Farsi, Russian, Romanian, Macedonian, Czech, Irish, and Mexican Spanish, which all have been described as having a fricative-like variant of their rhotic(s).
Previous research has reported a word-final devoiced and fricated alveolar tap for Turkish and Uzbek; dentalized alveolar trill and voiced uvular fricative for Kazakh; alveolar trill, approximant, and tap which may be fricated word-finally for Farsi; alveolar and palatalized trill for Russian and Romanian; alveolar trill for Macedonian; alveolar trill with a fricated variant for Czech; palatalized tap which may be fricated for Irish; and alveolar tap with a fricated variant for Mexican Spanish.
The data used for this cross-linguistic corpus study is from the Mozilla Common Voice corpus.
This exploratory analysis will examine spectral differences within and across languages for each rhotic.
The results of this study aim to assess the range of descriptions used for rhotics and their variants.
Related Results
Žanrovska analiza pomorskopravnih tekstova i ostvarenje prijevodnih univerzalija u njihovim prijevodima s engleskoga jezika
Žanrovska analiza pomorskopravnih tekstova i ostvarenje prijevodnih univerzalija u njihovim prijevodima s engleskoga jezika
Genre implies formal and stylistic conventions of a particular text type, which inevitably affects the translation process. This „force of genre bias“ (Prieto Ramos, 2014) has been...
Subjective audiometric measures in individuals with repeated acoustic trauma in the combat zone
Subjective audiometric measures in individuals with repeated acoustic trauma in the combat zone
Intense sound exposure that exceeds the pain threshold of human auditory sensitivity, known as acoustic trauma, causes significant and extensive changes in the auditory system. Thr...
On the Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of Isolated Cylinder(s) in Cross-Flow
On the Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of Isolated Cylinder(s) in Cross-Flow
The flow-excited acoustic resonance of single and multiple cylinders in cross-flow is investigated experimentally. The effect of the cylinder(s) proximity to the acoustic particle ...
Concept-based and relation-based corpus navigation : applications of natural language processing in digital humanities
Concept-based and relation-based corpus navigation : applications of natural language processing in digital humanities
Navigation en corpus fondée sur les concepts et les relations : applications du traitement automatique des langues aux humanités numériques
La recherche en Sciences...
The sociophonetics of rhotic variation in Sicilian dialects and Sicilian Italian: corpus, methodology and first results
The sociophonetics of rhotic variation in Sicilian dialects and Sicilian Italian: corpus, methodology and first results
SoPhISM (The SocioPhonetics of verbal Interaction: Sicilian Multimodal corpus) is an acoustic and articulatory sociophonetic corpus focused on whithin-speaker variation as a functi...
Exploring Language Features of Male and Female Speakers in Pakistani TEDx Talks: A Corpus-based Comparative Analysis
Exploring Language Features of Male and Female Speakers in Pakistani TEDx Talks: A Corpus-based Comparative Analysis
The study explores the linguistic patterns in Pakistani TEDx Talks. It is based on gender-based language use. It consists of ten talks selected from YouTube and applies both quanti...
Applications Of Acoustic Image Logs
Applications Of Acoustic Image Logs
Abstract
Acoustic image logs have been acquired in the Barua/Motatan and Mara fields as a part of the information acquisition program implemented by Maraven, S.A....
Rhotic Variation in Costa Rican Spanish
Rhotic Variation in Costa Rican Spanish
The class of sounds classified under the umbrella term “rhotic” demonstrate considerable variability across, languages, dialects, and speech styles. This is no exception in Spanish...

