Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Total Sand Management Solution For Guaranteed Flow Assurance In Subsea Development

View through CrossRef
Abstract Subsea development with long tieback to the beach is becoming the most economic cost effect method for deepwater development. In such deepwater environments multiphase fluid production accompanied by sand production is inevitable. Subsea developments/tiebacks are risk averse to sand/multiphase production for effective flow assurance. The major challenges for the asset teams in the development of such fields are in how to: Provide inputs into the subsea and topsides design in terms of possible quantity and particle size distribution of sand, and frequency of sand produced and transported through the wellbore into the subsea and topside facilitiesOptimise the well design that is fit-for-purposeMaximize the individual wells production and field development performanceEffectively manage the sand and multiphase fluid production as well as the facilities integrityDeploy appropriate sand management strategy that is fit for purpose including Critical evaluation of appropriate sand control method – Surface Control vs SubsurfaceMinimise the impact of sand production on the wells and subsea production facilitiesMinimize operational cost and non-productive time and guarantee flow assurance end-to end across the entire composite production system from reservoir through the wellbore to the topside and flow linesManage the waste disposal including the environmental impact assessment arising thereof. Achieving these objectives is the driver for our unique integrated engineering service and solutions strategy presented in this paper. The paper presents the step by step total sand management solution strategy that can enable managers of the subsea installations and complex fields to improve intervention and production efficiency through continuous process optimisation, reducing non-productive time and also guaranteeing flow assurance that can reduce lifting costs per barrel. The systematic approach is supported with the case study of a recent subsea development project study in the Gulf of Guinea field characterised by stacked volatile oil/condensate heterogeneous sand pools in 5000ft of water depth supported by detailed illustration of how the key geology and geophysics (G&G) and engineering data have been harvested for the integrated risk assessment. The reservoirs are being developed and produced via subsea flowlines, production manifolds, pipelines and risers to an FPSO. Pattern waterflood is also incorporated using seawater as injection source. The paper for the first time introduces the SMARTSAND Cum SMARTMULTIPHASE - two unique technology products that allow the planning team provide end to end solutions that clearly answered the following key questions: Will each of the wells produce sand?; when and how much sand will be produced?; How can the sand production be prevented or reduced without compromising fluid production?; How are the sand producers and the multiphase transportation managed as well as enhance production? The case study has detailed out the risk assessment steps that are an essential process to minimise the impact of sand production in deepwater/subsea environment. Results from the example case study in this work confirm that log based data and corresponding over and above core data provide the best approach to detailed reservoir characterization defined by reservoir quality index (RQI) and flow zone indicator(FZI) required for sand production rate prediction and transport analysis. The paper ends with how charging the reservoir with water injection can be an effective sand control method by extending the sand failure envelop and extensively prolong the onset of sand production.
Title: Total Sand Management Solution For Guaranteed Flow Assurance In Subsea Development
Description:
Abstract Subsea development with long tieback to the beach is becoming the most economic cost effect method for deepwater development.
In such deepwater environments multiphase fluid production accompanied by sand production is inevitable.
Subsea developments/tiebacks are risk averse to sand/multiphase production for effective flow assurance.
The major challenges for the asset teams in the development of such fields are in how to: Provide inputs into the subsea and topsides design in terms of possible quantity and particle size distribution of sand, and frequency of sand produced and transported through the wellbore into the subsea and topside facilitiesOptimise the well design that is fit-for-purposeMaximize the individual wells production and field development performanceEffectively manage the sand and multiphase fluid production as well as the facilities integrityDeploy appropriate sand management strategy that is fit for purpose including Critical evaluation of appropriate sand control method – Surface Control vs SubsurfaceMinimise the impact of sand production on the wells and subsea production facilitiesMinimize operational cost and non-productive time and guarantee flow assurance end-to end across the entire composite production system from reservoir through the wellbore to the topside and flow linesManage the waste disposal including the environmental impact assessment arising thereof.
Achieving these objectives is the driver for our unique integrated engineering service and solutions strategy presented in this paper.
The paper presents the step by step total sand management solution strategy that can enable managers of the subsea installations and complex fields to improve intervention and production efficiency through continuous process optimisation, reducing non-productive time and also guaranteeing flow assurance that can reduce lifting costs per barrel.
The systematic approach is supported with the case study of a recent subsea development project study in the Gulf of Guinea field characterised by stacked volatile oil/condensate heterogeneous sand pools in 5000ft of water depth supported by detailed illustration of how the key geology and geophysics (G&G) and engineering data have been harvested for the integrated risk assessment.
The reservoirs are being developed and produced via subsea flowlines, production manifolds, pipelines and risers to an FPSO.
Pattern waterflood is also incorporated using seawater as injection source.
The paper for the first time introduces the SMARTSAND Cum SMARTMULTIPHASE - two unique technology products that allow the planning team provide end to end solutions that clearly answered the following key questions: Will each of the wells produce sand?; when and how much sand will be produced?; How can the sand production be prevented or reduced without compromising fluid production?; How are the sand producers and the multiphase transportation managed as well as enhance production? The case study has detailed out the risk assessment steps that are an essential process to minimise the impact of sand production in deepwater/subsea environment.
Results from the example case study in this work confirm that log based data and corresponding over and above core data provide the best approach to detailed reservoir characterization defined by reservoir quality index (RQI) and flow zone indicator(FZI) required for sand production rate prediction and transport analysis.
The paper ends with how charging the reservoir with water injection can be an effective sand control method by extending the sand failure envelop and extensively prolong the onset of sand production.

Related Results

Sand Production Management
Sand Production Management
Abstract Sand production may be inevitable in many fields that have a relatively lower formation strength. Sand erosion and settling predictions and sand monitori...
Subsea Factory–Standardization of the Brownfield Factory
Subsea Factory–Standardization of the Brownfield Factory
Abstract As part of the corporate technology strategy Statoil has launched a technology plan for the Subsea Factory concept. The plan describes how to combine subsea...
Simple Subsea Trees for Shallow Water: An Economical Alternative
Simple Subsea Trees for Shallow Water: An Economical Alternative
Abstract Simple, diver assisted subsea completions have been installed and operated successfully in many shallow water oil fields around the world. Although these...
Inspection of Subsea Conductors Using an Innovative Drop-Down Camera
Inspection of Subsea Conductors Using an Innovative Drop-Down Camera
Abstract Subsea conductors are the foundational elements of offshore drilling operations, serving a dual purpose as both the structural framework and the main condui...
Technology Focus: Subsea Systems (August 2025)
Technology Focus: Subsea Systems (August 2025)
_ From a broader and high-level perspective—considering importance, impact, significance, and criticality—subsea systems and advanced offshore engineering play an...
Evolution Of Subsea Production Systems: A Worldwide Overview
Evolution Of Subsea Production Systems: A Worldwide Overview
ABSTRACT The evolution in the use of subsea technology has seen advancement -from I well in the Gulf of Mexico in 1961 to over 750 wells in a tide variety of loca...
Flow Assurance Aspects of Intrusive Erosion Probes
Flow Assurance Aspects of Intrusive Erosion Probes
Abstract Sand erosion in subsea components and pipelines can cause serious design and production problems. Erosion is a complex process that is affected by numero...
Ormen Lange Subsea Production System
Ormen Lange Subsea Production System
Abstract This paper presents the concept and the technical solutions developed and applied to the Ormen Lange subsea production system. First, the key technical c...

Back to Top