Javascript must be enabled to continue!
What do seismic clusters tell us about fault stability?
View through CrossRef
Seismic activity clusters in space and time due to stress accumulation and static and dynamic triggering. Therefore, both moderate and large magnitude events can be preceded by smaller events and also seismic swarms can occur without being succeeded by major shocks – which represents the vast majority of cases.Unveiling if seismic activity can forewarn mainshocks, being somewhat distinguished by swarms, is an issue of crucial importance for the development of short-term seismic hazard. The analysis of thousand clusters of seismicity before mainshocks in Southern California and Italy highlights that the surface over which selected seismic activity spreads is positively correlated with the magnitude of the impending mainshock, as well as the cumulative seismic moment, the number of earthquakes, the variance of magnitude and its entropy, while no significant difference is observed in the duration, seismic rate, and trends of magnitudes and interevent times between foreshocks and swarms. Our interpretation is that crustal volumes and fault interfaces host more and more correlated seismicity as they become unstable, and some properties of seismic clusters may mark their state of stability. For this reason, large mainshocks tend to occur in more extended correlated regions and because of the scaling of maximum magnitudes with the size of unstable faults. Considering this, the recording of more numerous and energetic cluster activity before mainshocks than during swarms is also reasonable.In recent years, our ability to track seismic clusters has improved outstandingly, so that their structural and statistical characterization can be performed almost in real time. Therefore, it may be possible to compare the current features of the active seismic cluster with the cumulative distribution functions of past seismicity. However, we would like to stress that foreshocks should not be considered as precursors in the sense that neither they forewarn mainshocks, nor they are physically different from swarms: the precursor is not in seismic activity itself, but in the development of mechanical instability within crustal volumes.
Title: What do seismic clusters tell us about fault stability?
Description:
Seismic activity clusters in space and time due to stress accumulation and static and dynamic triggering.
Therefore, both moderate and large magnitude events can be preceded by smaller events and also seismic swarms can occur without being succeeded by major shocks – which represents the vast majority of cases.
Unveiling if seismic activity can forewarn mainshocks, being somewhat distinguished by swarms, is an issue of crucial importance for the development of short-term seismic hazard.
The analysis of thousand clusters of seismicity before mainshocks in Southern California and Italy highlights that the surface over which selected seismic activity spreads is positively correlated with the magnitude of the impending mainshock, as well as the cumulative seismic moment, the number of earthquakes, the variance of magnitude and its entropy, while no significant difference is observed in the duration, seismic rate, and trends of magnitudes and interevent times between foreshocks and swarms.
Our interpretation is that crustal volumes and fault interfaces host more and more correlated seismicity as they become unstable, and some properties of seismic clusters may mark their state of stability.
For this reason, large mainshocks tend to occur in more extended correlated regions and because of the scaling of maximum magnitudes with the size of unstable faults.
Considering this, the recording of more numerous and energetic cluster activity before mainshocks than during swarms is also reasonable.
In recent years, our ability to track seismic clusters has improved outstandingly, so that their structural and statistical characterization can be performed almost in real time.
Therefore, it may be possible to compare the current features of the active seismic cluster with the cumulative distribution functions of past seismicity.
However, we would like to stress that foreshocks should not be considered as precursors in the sense that neither they forewarn mainshocks, nor they are physically different from swarms: the precursor is not in seismic activity itself, but in the development of mechanical instability within crustal volumes.
Related Results
Integration Techniques of Fault Detection and Isolation Using Interval Observers
Integration Techniques of Fault Detection and Isolation Using Interval Observers
An interval observer has been illustrated to be a suitable approach to detect and isolate faults affecting complex dynamical industrial systems.
Concerning fault detection, interv...
Deformational Processes Accommodating Slip on an Active Low-Angle Normal Fault, Suckling-Dayman Metamorphic Core Complex, Papua New Guinea
Deformational Processes Accommodating Slip on an Active Low-Angle Normal Fault, Suckling-Dayman Metamorphic Core Complex, Papua New Guinea
<p><b>Detachment faults that can be shown to have slipped at dips <30° in highly extended continental crust are referred to as “Low-Angle Normal Faults” (LANFs). The...
Integrated Subtle Fault Prediction Technique Based on Seismic Conditioning and Deep Learning
Integrated Subtle Fault Prediction Technique Based on Seismic Conditioning and Deep Learning
Abstract
With the development of oilfield, the role of subtle faults becomes more and more important. Due to the limitation resolution of seismic data, it is hard fo...
AI-Assisted Subtle Faults Characterization Based on the Integrated Seismic Diffraction Imaging and its Application in M Oilfield, Middle East
AI-Assisted Subtle Faults Characterization Based on the Integrated Seismic Diffraction Imaging and its Application in M Oilfield, Middle East
Abstract
Subtle faults play a key role in reservoir characterization. Due to subtle faults in carbonate reservoirs are often below seismic resolution, it is very dif...
Late Quaternary Activity: Kouma Fault
Late Quaternary Activity: Kouma Fault
The Kouma Fault, located at the northern foot of the Mangshan Mountain in Luoyang City, Henan Province, China, is an active fault newly discovered in the field seismic geological s...
Decomposition and Evolution of Intracontinental Strike‐Slip Faults in Eastern Tibetan Plateau
Decomposition and Evolution of Intracontinental Strike‐Slip Faults in Eastern Tibetan Plateau
Abstract:Little attention had been paid to the intracontinental strike‐slip faults of the Tibetan Plateau. Since the discovery of the Longriba fault using re‐measured GPS data in 2...
Subtle Faults Characterization Based on Fault Simulation and AI OBN Seismic Attributes Optimization
Subtle Faults Characterization Based on Fault Simulation and AI OBN Seismic Attributes Optimization
Abstract
Subtle faults are often below seismic resolution, especially in strike slip regimes, it is very difficult to identify them as they have small throw and the ...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...

