Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in categories of patients in the UK
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has declined steadily over the last few decades across Europe and North America.
Purpose
To provide contemporary estimates of long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in different categories of patients in UK.
Methods
The CTT-UKB micro-simulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration data (CTT: 118,000 participants; 5 years follow-up), and calibrated in the UK Biobank cohort (UKB: 502,000 participants; 9 years follow-up). The model integrates parametric risk equations for incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, diabetes, cancer and vascular and nonvascular death, and projects annually these endpoints and survival using patient characteristics at entry. UKB data and linked primary and hospital care data informed healthcare costs in the model (2020 UK£); 2021 UK NHS Drug Tariff informed statin costs (atorvastatin 40mg at £1.22 and 80mg at £1.68 per 28 tablets); and Health Survey for England data informed health-related quality of life in the model. Previous CTT meta-analysis, atorvastatin dose-response randomized trials, and further meta-analyses of statin trials and cohort studies informed effects of 40mg/80mg atorvastatin therapy daily on rates of incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, vascular death, diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis.
The model was used to project gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and additional cost per QALY with lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg or 80mg daily in categories of UKB participants by sex, age at statin initiation (40–49; 50–59 and 60–70 years), and 10-year CVD risk (QRISK3 risk (%): <5; 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, ≥20). Further scenarios explored effects of 5-year delay of statin initiation in people under 45 years of age or stopping statin therapy at 80 years of age.
Results
Across men and women in categories by age and CVD risk, lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg daily was associated with increases in survival by 0.44–1.69 years (0.28–1.02 QALYs), and atorvastatin 80mg daily with increases in survival of 0.45–1.87 years (0.32–1.13 QALYs; Figure 1) with gains larger among participants at higher CVD risk. Both atorvastatin 40mg and 80mg doses were in the range of cost-effective treatments with incremental cost per QALY gained with atorvastatin 40mg daily versus no statin therapy below £7200/QALY and with atorvastatin 80mg vs 40mg daily below £16000/QALY (Figure 2) across all patient categories studied. Compared to lifetime statin therapy, stopping therapy at 80 years of age substantially reduced benefits and was not cost-effective in any patient category studied. Similarly, compared to immediate initiation, 5-year delay of statin therapy in 40–45 years old patients was not a cost-effective.
Conclusions
In the UK, statin therapy remains highly cost-effective across men and women 40–70 years old, including those at 10-year CVD risk <5%.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK Medical Research Council (MRC), British Heart Foundation
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in categories of patients in the UK
Description:
Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has declined steadily over the last few decades across Europe and North America.
Purpose
To provide contemporary estimates of long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in different categories of patients in UK.
Methods
The CTT-UKB micro-simulation model, developed using the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration data (CTT: 118,000 participants; 5 years follow-up), and calibrated in the UK Biobank cohort (UKB: 502,000 participants; 9 years follow-up).
The model integrates parametric risk equations for incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, diabetes, cancer and vascular and nonvascular death, and projects annually these endpoints and survival using patient characteristics at entry.
UKB data and linked primary and hospital care data informed healthcare costs in the model (2020 UK£); 2021 UK NHS Drug Tariff informed statin costs (atorvastatin 40mg at £1.
22 and 80mg at £1.
68 per 28 tablets); and Health Survey for England data informed health-related quality of life in the model.
Previous CTT meta-analysis, atorvastatin dose-response randomized trials, and further meta-analyses of statin trials and cohort studies informed effects of 40mg/80mg atorvastatin therapy daily on rates of incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, vascular death, diabetes, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis.
The model was used to project gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and additional cost per QALY with lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg or 80mg daily in categories of UKB participants by sex, age at statin initiation (40–49; 50–59 and 60–70 years), and 10-year CVD risk (QRISK3 risk (%): <5; 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, ≥20).
Further scenarios explored effects of 5-year delay of statin initiation in people under 45 years of age or stopping statin therapy at 80 years of age.
Results
Across men and women in categories by age and CVD risk, lifetime use of atorvastatin 40mg daily was associated with increases in survival by 0.
44–1.
69 years (0.
28–1.
02 QALYs), and atorvastatin 80mg daily with increases in survival of 0.
45–1.
87 years (0.
32–1.
13 QALYs; Figure 1) with gains larger among participants at higher CVD risk.
Both atorvastatin 40mg and 80mg doses were in the range of cost-effective treatments with incremental cost per QALY gained with atorvastatin 40mg daily versus no statin therapy below £7200/QALY and with atorvastatin 80mg vs 40mg daily below £16000/QALY (Figure 2) across all patient categories studied.
Compared to lifetime statin therapy, stopping therapy at 80 years of age substantially reduced benefits and was not cost-effective in any patient category studied.
Similarly, compared to immediate initiation, 5-year delay of statin therapy in 40–45 years old patients was not a cost-effective.
Conclusions
In the UK, statin therapy remains highly cost-effective across men and women 40–70 years old, including those at 10-year CVD risk <5%.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only.
Main funding source(s): UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, UK Medical Research Council (MRC), British Heart Foundation.
Related Results
Abstract P1-15-03: Assessing the association of statins with clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer
Abstract P1-15-03: Assessing the association of statins with clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer
Abstract
Background: A growing number of studies are claiming lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) primarily statins have anticancer properties to inhibit proliferation...
Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Abstract
Purpose
The objective of this study was to identify predictors of statin adherence in the primary and secondary preven...
1228-P: Comparison between Combination of Low- or Moderate-Intensity Statin with Ezetimibe and High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortalities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—A Propensity-Match
1228-P: Comparison between Combination of Low- or Moderate-Intensity Statin with Ezetimibe and High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortalities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—A Propensity-Match
Background and Aims: Here, we compared the effects of combination therapy of low- or moderate-statin with ezetimibe and high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 di...
A Possible Solution to Statin Noncompliance
A Possible Solution to Statin Noncompliance
Dear Sir/Madam
Pakistan is one of the top six countries for Cardiovascular deaths and it is estimated that 4.7 million people will die from Cardiovascular deaths between 2005-2027[...
Abstract 112: Statin Utilization in the Outpatient Clinic of a University Based Residency Training Program
Abstract 112: Statin Utilization in the Outpatient Clinic of a University Based Residency Training Program
Background:
Current guidelines released in 2013 recommend statins for five specific patient groups including persons with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseas...
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
Abstract
While numerous clinical studies have examined the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statin drugs) on calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), their co...
Atheroma Progression in Hyporesponders to Statin Therapy
Atheroma Progression in Hyporesponders to Statin Therapy
Objective—
Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins has been demonstrated to slow plaque progression. This antiatherosclerotic effect in patien...
Statin use and the risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort study
Statin use and the risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort study
Abstract
Background: Statins, among the most widely prescribed medications worldwide, inhibit the mevalonate pathway and...

