Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

1228-P: Comparison between Combination of Low- or Moderate-Intensity Statin with Ezetimibe and High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortalities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—A Propensity-Match

View through CrossRef
Background and Aims: Here, we compared the effects of combination therapy of low- or moderate-statin with ezetimibe and high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes without previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) on incident CVD and all cause mortalities in a real-world setting. Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service datasets, two cohorts comparing high intensity statin monotherapy with low- or moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe combination therapy were constructed using a 1:1 propensity score matching procedure and were followed up for 3.4 years. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of individual events. Results: Compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of composite outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 - 0.98, P=0.029) as well as stroke (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.93, P=0.014), but not MI or all cause mortalities. However, there was no significant risk reduction in composite outcomes following low-intensity statin therapy with ezetimibe (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 - 1.39, P=0.882) than that after high-intensity statin monotherapy. The statin with ezetimibe combination showed a consistent efficacy regardless of diverse patients’ baseline characteristics. Conclusions: Moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy was superior to high-intensity statin monotherapy for CVD primary prevention, and low-intensity statin with ezetimibe showed a comparable efficacy to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Disclosure Y.Hwang: None. S.Park: None. I.Jeong: None. K.Ahn: None. H.Chung: None.
Title: 1228-P: Comparison between Combination of Low- or Moderate-Intensity Statin with Ezetimibe and High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortalities in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—A Propensity-Match
Description:
Background and Aims: Here, we compared the effects of combination therapy of low- or moderate-statin with ezetimibe and high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes without previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) on incident CVD and all cause mortalities in a real-world setting.
Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service datasets, two cohorts comparing high intensity statin monotherapy with low- or moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe combination therapy were constructed using a 1:1 propensity score matching procedure and were followed up for 3.
4 years.
The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause mortality.
The secondary outcome was the occurrence of individual events.
Results: Compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of composite outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.
85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.
74 - 0.
98, P=0.
029) as well as stroke (HR 0.
70, 95% CI 0.
52 - 0.
93, P=0.
014), but not MI or all cause mortalities.
However, there was no significant risk reduction in composite outcomes following low-intensity statin therapy with ezetimibe (HR 1.
02, 95% CI 0.
75 - 1.
39, P=0.
882) than that after high-intensity statin monotherapy.
The statin with ezetimibe combination showed a consistent efficacy regardless of diverse patients’ baseline characteristics.
Conclusions: Moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy was superior to high-intensity statin monotherapy for CVD primary prevention, and low-intensity statin with ezetimibe showed a comparable efficacy to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Disclosure Y.
Hwang: None.
S.
Park: None.
I.
Jeong: None.
K.
Ahn: None.
H.
Chung: None.

Related Results

Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to identify predictors of statin adherence in the primary and secondary preven...
Diabetes Awareness Among High School Students in Qatar
Diabetes Awareness Among High School Students in Qatar
Diabetes is a disease that occurs when there is an abundance of glucose in the blood stream and the body cannot produce enough insulin in the pancreas to transfer the sugar from th...

Back to Top