Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Disclosing disabilities: Barriers for medical school applicants
View through CrossRef
This study investigated the availability of accommodation request procedures for medical school admissions interviews and the accessibility of Technical Standards (TS) for candidates with disabilities (CWD) across Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited institutions in the United States and Canada. Utilizing a cross-sectional study methodology, surveys were distributed to Deans of Admissions and Disabilities Resource Professionals (DRP) at all LCME-accredited US and Canadian MD programs. Surveys gathered data about interview formats, interview accommodation procedures, and TS accessibility during the 2018–2019 academic year. We received responses from 71 institutions (41.3%), with 56.3% survey completion rate (n = 40). Among respondents, interview formats varied: 26.8% (n = 19) Multiple Mini Interview, 32.4% (n = 23) Traditional Interviews, and 16.9% (n = 12) hybrid. 38% (n = 27) of respondents informed CWD of accommodation procedures before interviews. Ten institutions (14.1%) indicated they had updated their procedure since the 2018–2019 academic year, which demonstrated better overall outcomes. Statistical analyses showed significant differences between institutions with/without updated procedures in the total number of applicants who requested accommodations, were granted interviews, provided interview day accommodation, offered admission, and matriculated (p = 0.005). In 66.7% (n = 18) of respondent institutions, admissions staff were aware of initial interview accommodation requests and 44.4% (n = 12) involved admissions staff when communicating accommodation plans. Among 27 schools, 55.6% (n = 15) required no documentation to support the CWD’s need for accommodation; the rest required a form, clinician’s letter, past proof, or other methods. 56.3% (n = 40) responded questions about TS and confirmed posting them on their website, with 77.5% (n = 31) on their admissions webpage. 77.5% (n = 31) also reported including language in the TS that direct CWD to the institution’s disability office. This study reveals communication deficiencies about accommodations and TS requirements during the admissions process. Recommendations to enhance accessibility include informing candidates early about accommodation procedures and TS, and utilizing DRPs as CWD’s primary accommodation contact.
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Disclosing disabilities: Barriers for medical school applicants
Description:
This study investigated the availability of accommodation request procedures for medical school admissions interviews and the accessibility of Technical Standards (TS) for candidates with disabilities (CWD) across Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited institutions in the United States and Canada.
Utilizing a cross-sectional study methodology, surveys were distributed to Deans of Admissions and Disabilities Resource Professionals (DRP) at all LCME-accredited US and Canadian MD programs.
Surveys gathered data about interview formats, interview accommodation procedures, and TS accessibility during the 2018–2019 academic year.
We received responses from 71 institutions (41.
3%), with 56.
3% survey completion rate (n = 40).
Among respondents, interview formats varied: 26.
8% (n = 19) Multiple Mini Interview, 32.
4% (n = 23) Traditional Interviews, and 16.
9% (n = 12) hybrid.
38% (n = 27) of respondents informed CWD of accommodation procedures before interviews.
Ten institutions (14.
1%) indicated they had updated their procedure since the 2018–2019 academic year, which demonstrated better overall outcomes.
Statistical analyses showed significant differences between institutions with/without updated procedures in the total number of applicants who requested accommodations, were granted interviews, provided interview day accommodation, offered admission, and matriculated (p = 0.
005).
In 66.
7% (n = 18) of respondent institutions, admissions staff were aware of initial interview accommodation requests and 44.
4% (n = 12) involved admissions staff when communicating accommodation plans.
Among 27 schools, 55.
6% (n = 15) required no documentation to support the CWD’s need for accommodation; the rest required a form, clinician’s letter, past proof, or other methods.
56.
3% (n = 40) responded questions about TS and confirmed posting them on their website, with 77.
5% (n = 31) on their admissions webpage.
77.
5% (n = 31) also reported including language in the TS that direct CWD to the institution’s disability office.
This study reveals communication deficiencies about accommodations and TS requirements during the admissions process.
Recommendations to enhance accessibility include informing candidates early about accommodation procedures and TS, and utilizing DRPs as CWD’s primary accommodation contact.
Related Results
Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants
Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants
AbstractObjective The study aimed to investigate factors influencing choice of specialty among ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology residency applicants.Patients and Methods Anonymo...
Orthopaedic Residency Applicants' Perspective on Program-Based Social Media
Orthopaedic Residency Applicants' Perspective on Program-Based Social Media
Background:
Social media and online resources have been used in graduate medical education for years. In addition to an official residency program website, many orthopa...
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
The publication presents the findings of an inquiry conducted among 110 girls aged 15 - 17 who had been directed, on the grounds of being “out of school and out of work”, to two on...
How Does the Job Interview Medium Affect Fairness Perceptions and Interview Ratings? The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Social Presence Does the Job Interview Medium Affect Fairness Perceptions and Interview Ratings? The Mediating Role of Perceptions of
How Does the Job Interview Medium Affect Fairness Perceptions and Interview Ratings? The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Social Presence Does the Job Interview Medium Affect Fairness Perceptions and Interview Ratings? The Mediating Role of Perceptions of
Abstract
The use of video-conference interviews (VIs) has increased substantially, especially with advances in technology and the emergence of COVID-19. Although prior rese...
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Background To match medical students into residency training programs, both the program and student create rank order lists (ROLs). We aim to investigate temporal trends in ROL len...
Patterns and Predictors of Cross‐Applications Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants
Patterns and Predictors of Cross‐Applications Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants
ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the applicant characteristics associated with cross‐applying to otolaryngology‐head and ne...
Essays in the economics of education and behavioral economics
Essays in the economics of education and behavioral economics
This dissertation analyzes the ways that college applicants and college students navigate through higher education with a focus on ways to improve their experience. In the first ch...

