Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants
View through CrossRef
AbstractObjective The study aimed to investigate factors influencing choice of specialty among ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology residency applicants.Patients and Methods Anonymous, web-based surveys were distributed through REDCap to the 2019 to 2020 residency applicants to the Penn State Department of Ophthalmology and, as a control group, Penn State medical students applying to non-ophthalmology residencies for the 2019 to 2020 cycle. The primary outcome was factors that influenced specialty choice among ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants. Secondary outcomes include hours of exposure to applicants' selected specialty in the medical school preclinical curriculum, and proportion of ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants who decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their specialty prior to clinical rotations.Results Surveys were completed by 203/441 (46.0%) ophthalmology and 85/139 (61.1%) non-ophthalmology applicants. Fewer than 20 hours of exposure to an applicant's selected specialty were provided in the medical school preclinical curriculum for 86.7% of ophthalmology and 42.4% of non-ophthalmology applicants (p < 0.001). Ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a similar rate to non-ophthalmology applicants (60.6 vs. 58.8%, respectively). Factors influencing specialty choice cited most commonly by ophthalmology applicants include professional satisfaction (94.1%), performing surgeries/procedures (92.6%), personal fit with specialty (91.1%), work-life balance (91.1%), and ability to see patients in a clinic setting (90.6%), compared to personal fit with specialty (95.3%)%, clinical rotation in selected specialty (95.3%), professional satisfaction (91.8%), intellectual stimulation (89.4%), and subinternship or away rotation (89.4%) among non-ophthalmology applicants.Conclusion Professional satisfaction and personal fit with specialty were among the most commonly cited factors influencing specialty choice for both groups. Other factors cited most frequently by ophthalmology applicants include performing surgeries/procedures, work-life balance, and ability to see patients in a clinic setting. Despite limited ophthalmology exposure in medical school preclinical curricula, ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a rate similar to non-ophthalmology applicants.
Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology
Title: Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants
Description:
AbstractObjective The study aimed to investigate factors influencing choice of specialty among ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology residency applicants.
Patients and Methods Anonymous, web-based surveys were distributed through REDCap to the 2019 to 2020 residency applicants to the Penn State Department of Ophthalmology and, as a control group, Penn State medical students applying to non-ophthalmology residencies for the 2019 to 2020 cycle.
The primary outcome was factors that influenced specialty choice among ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants.
Secondary outcomes include hours of exposure to applicants' selected specialty in the medical school preclinical curriculum, and proportion of ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants who decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their specialty prior to clinical rotations.
Results Surveys were completed by 203/441 (46.
0%) ophthalmology and 85/139 (61.
1%) non-ophthalmology applicants.
Fewer than 20 hours of exposure to an applicant's selected specialty were provided in the medical school preclinical curriculum for 86.
7% of ophthalmology and 42.
4% of non-ophthalmology applicants (p < 0.
001).
Ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a similar rate to non-ophthalmology applicants (60.
6 vs.
58.
8%, respectively).
Factors influencing specialty choice cited most commonly by ophthalmology applicants include professional satisfaction (94.
1%), performing surgeries/procedures (92.
6%), personal fit with specialty (91.
1%), work-life balance (91.
1%), and ability to see patients in a clinic setting (90.
6%), compared to personal fit with specialty (95.
3%)%, clinical rotation in selected specialty (95.
3%), professional satisfaction (91.
8%), intellectual stimulation (89.
4%), and subinternship or away rotation (89.
4%) among non-ophthalmology applicants.
Conclusion Professional satisfaction and personal fit with specialty were among the most commonly cited factors influencing specialty choice for both groups.
Other factors cited most frequently by ophthalmology applicants include performing surgeries/procedures, work-life balance, and ability to see patients in a clinic setting.
Despite limited ophthalmology exposure in medical school preclinical curricula, ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a rate similar to non-ophthalmology applicants.
Related Results
Applicants' Interest in International Ophthalmology during Residency Training: Influence in Selecting U.S. Residency Programs
Applicants' Interest in International Ophthalmology during Residency Training: Influence in Selecting U.S. Residency Programs
Background In recent years, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Residency Committee for Ophthalmology formally recognized international health elective...
Geographic Trends in the Ophthalmology Residency Match: Influence of Program and Applicant Characteristics
Geographic Trends in the Ophthalmology Residency Match: Influence of Program and Applicant Characteristics
Abstract
Introduction The ophthalmology residency match remains competitive. Several prior studies have examined various factors that contribute to a successful match int...
Orthopaedic Residency Applicants' Perspective on Program-Based Social Media
Orthopaedic Residency Applicants' Perspective on Program-Based Social Media
Background:
Social media and online resources have been used in graduate medical education for years. In addition to an official residency program website, many orthopa...
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Background To match medical students into residency training programs, both the program and student create rank order lists (ROLs). We aim to investigate temporal trends in ROL len...
Patterns and Predictors of Cross‐Applications Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants
Patterns and Predictors of Cross‐Applications Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants
ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the applicant characteristics associated with cross‐applying to otolaryngology‐head and ne...
Predictors of getting a residency interview: Differences by medical specialty
Predictors of getting a residency interview: Differences by medical specialty
Abstract
Objectives
Gaining medical residency interviews has become more competitive and costly for medical students. Alt...
The Dynamic History of the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program
The Dynamic History of the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program
Abstract
Background The ophthalmology residency matching program is the first successful medical specialty match, dating back to 1979. This article reviews the impetus fo...
Attributes, Attitudes, and Motivations of Personnel Involved with Sports Physical Therapy Residency Training
Attributes, Attitudes, and Motivations of Personnel Involved with Sports Physical Therapy Residency Training
Background Post-professional residency training in sports physical therapy has undergone rapid growth since its inception over 20 years ago with 58 programs currently accredited. ...

