Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract TP142: Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Stimulation to Augment Aphasia Therapy

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Previous studies indicate that anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (A-tDCS) to left hemisphere or cathodal tDCS (C-tDCS) to right hemisphere might augment aphasia therapy to facilitate language recovery after chronic stroke and that cerebellar tDCS can augment verbal fluency and learning in healthy controls. Hypothesis: A-tDCS or C-tDCS) plus naming therapy results in improved naming performance for trained and untrained items from baseline to post-treatment compared to sham plus naming therapy in chronic aphasia. Methods: Six patients with large, chronic left middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke and one patient with large bilateral MCA strokes participated in a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled, within-subject crossover trial (15 sessions of sham + naming therapy and 15 sessions of tDCS + naming therapy, in random order, separated by 2 months). 4 patients were randomly assigned to A-tDCS and 3 patients were assigned to C-tDCS. We used 2 mA for stimulation over right cerebellum for the first 20 minutes of computer-delivered naming therapy. Within-subjects within-treatments analysis using McNemar’s test for correlated responses to evaluate gains from each of the treatment conditions. An alpha level of p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: tDCS + naming treatment produced significant gains in naming of both trained and untrained items in 3/4 patients with anodal stimulation and 3/3 patients with cathodal treatment. Sham + naming treatment produced gains for only trained items, and only in 4/7 participants. Discussion: A-tDCS or C-tDCS improved generalization of improvements to untrained stimuli after naming therapy for most patients. Results indicate potential usefulness of right cerebellar tDCS to augment naming therapy after chronic post stroke aphasia with large left or bilateral lesions.
Title: Abstract TP142: Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Stimulation to Augment Aphasia Therapy
Description:
Introduction: Previous studies indicate that anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (A-tDCS) to left hemisphere or cathodal tDCS (C-tDCS) to right hemisphere might augment aphasia therapy to facilitate language recovery after chronic stroke and that cerebellar tDCS can augment verbal fluency and learning in healthy controls.
Hypothesis: A-tDCS or C-tDCS) plus naming therapy results in improved naming performance for trained and untrained items from baseline to post-treatment compared to sham plus naming therapy in chronic aphasia.
Methods: Six patients with large, chronic left middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke and one patient with large bilateral MCA strokes participated in a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled, within-subject crossover trial (15 sessions of sham + naming therapy and 15 sessions of tDCS + naming therapy, in random order, separated by 2 months).
4 patients were randomly assigned to A-tDCS and 3 patients were assigned to C-tDCS.
We used 2 mA for stimulation over right cerebellum for the first 20 minutes of computer-delivered naming therapy.
Within-subjects within-treatments analysis using McNemar’s test for correlated responses to evaluate gains from each of the treatment conditions.
An alpha level of p<0.
05 was considered significant.
Results: tDCS + naming treatment produced significant gains in naming of both trained and untrained items in 3/4 patients with anodal stimulation and 3/3 patients with cathodal treatment.
Sham + naming treatment produced gains for only trained items, and only in 4/7 participants.
Discussion: A-tDCS or C-tDCS improved generalization of improvements to untrained stimuli after naming therapy for most patients.
Results indicate potential usefulness of right cerebellar tDCS to augment naming therapy after chronic post stroke aphasia with large left or bilateral lesions.

Related Results

Characteristics of Aphasia in Ischemic Stroke Patients at Dr. Mahar Mardjono National Brain Center Hospital Indonesia in 2021
Characteristics of Aphasia in Ischemic Stroke Patients at Dr. Mahar Mardjono National Brain Center Hospital Indonesia in 2021
Highlights: 1. To author’s knowledge, this study is the first study done in National Brain Center Hospital In Jakarta2. No similar studies have been done during the pandemic era3. ...
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
AbstractKnowledge of the frequency and remission of aphasia is essential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients and provides insight into the brain organization of language. We ...
Careful, Women! Is Orgasm Worth the Cost of Your Cerebellum? Flibanserin-Induced Cerebellar Dysfunction
Careful, Women! Is Orgasm Worth the Cost of Your Cerebellum? Flibanserin-Induced Cerebellar Dysfunction
AbstractIntroductionFlibanserin, a serotonin antagonist currently indicated for treatment of female sexual dysfunction disorder, has not heretofore been described to worsen cerebel...
Transcranial electrostimulation and magnetic stimulation: modern physiotherapy technologies
Transcranial electrostimulation and magnetic stimulation: modern physiotherapy technologies
The article presents a comprehensive literature review of two non-invasive neuromodulation methods: transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation. The a...
Systematic Review: Communication Model in Stroke Patients With Verbal Communication Disorders
Systematic Review: Communication Model in Stroke Patients With Verbal Communication Disorders
Abstract Aphasia is a manifestation of the impact of stroke disease that affects communication abilities and occurs due to damage to the brain area that regulates the langu...

Back to Top