Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cluster Analysis Approach to the Problem of Facies Classification of the Carbonate Rocks in the Krol Series
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The Krol series in the Sub-Himalayas, include six lithological units, namely Infra Krol, Krol A.B.C.D. and E. Among these, A.C.D. and E. incorporate increasing thicknesses of carbonate rocks from A to E, with minor shale intercalations. Cluster analysis of 150 carbonate samples drawn from these four formations in five stratigraphic profiles between Mussoorie and Lansdowne, based on six petrographic attributes, has shown that the samples cluster into four meaningful groups. Interpretation of these groups reveals that the carbonate rocks of the Krol series fall into two broad facies or depositional mechanisms, one Krol A+C, of micrites and sparites, and the other, Krol D+E of calcicdolo and dolocalcicmicrites, and their variants. The earlier classification of Krol carbonates into four lithological units, A.C.D and E, from a facies point of view, seems to be unjustified. The depositional mechanism of A+C is succeeded by Krol D+E in the vertical profile. This supports the earlier view of Rao that the Krols represent a phase in the development of a basin centre evaporite sequence.
Title: Cluster Analysis Approach to the Problem of Facies Classification of the Carbonate Rocks in the Krol Series
Description:
Abstract
The Krol series in the Sub-Himalayas, include six lithological units, namely Infra Krol, Krol A.
B.
C.
D.
and E.
Among these, A.
C.
D.
and E.
incorporate increasing thicknesses of carbonate rocks from A to E, with minor shale intercalations.
Cluster analysis of 150 carbonate samples drawn from these four formations in five stratigraphic profiles between Mussoorie and Lansdowne, based on six petrographic attributes, has shown that the samples cluster into four meaningful groups.
Interpretation of these groups reveals that the carbonate rocks of the Krol series fall into two broad facies or depositional mechanisms, one Krol A+C, of micrites and sparites, and the other, Krol D+E of calcicdolo and dolocalcicmicrites, and their variants.
The earlier classification of Krol carbonates into four lithological units, A.
C.
D and E, from a facies point of view, seems to be unjustified.
The depositional mechanism of A+C is succeeded by Krol D+E in the vertical profile.
This supports the earlier view of Rao that the Krols represent a phase in the development of a basin centre evaporite sequence.
Related Results
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Abstract
Standard carbonate facies models are widely used to interpret paleoenvironments, but they do not address how carbonate platforms are affected by relative...
Ediacaran Biota from the Jarashi (Middle Krol) and Mahi (Lower Krol) Formations, Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India
Ediacaran Biota from the Jarashi (Middle Krol) and Mahi (Lower Krol) Formations, Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India
Abstract:
The Ediacaran biota is already known from the Kauriyala Formation (Upper Krol) of Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India. The present work records the Ediac...
Unveiling the Evolution and Facies Distribution of a Miocene Carbonate Platform in Central Luconia, Offshore Malaysia
Unveiling the Evolution and Facies Distribution of a Miocene Carbonate Platform in Central Luconia, Offshore Malaysia
Abstract
The evolution and facies distribution of relatively small carbonate platforms, approximately 30 km2, are not well documented, even though they are common in...
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Amid increasing interest in enhanced oil recovery and carbon geological sequestration programs, improved static reservoir lithofacies models are emerging as a requirement for well-...
Sedimentary facies of Carboniferous–Permian mid‐oceanic carbonates in the Changning–Menglian Belt, West Yunnan, Southwest China: Origin and depositional process
Sedimentary facies of Carboniferous–Permian mid‐oceanic carbonates in the Changning–Menglian Belt, West Yunnan, Southwest China: Origin and depositional process
AbstractHuge carbonate rock bodies ranging in age from the Visean (Middle Mississippian/Early Carboniferous) to the Changhsingian (Lopingian/Late Permian) overlie a basaltic baseme...
Improved Method for Estimating the Strength of Carbonate Rocks
Improved Method for Estimating the Strength of Carbonate Rocks
Abstract
A substantial number of underground formations penetrated during oil and gas well drilling operations consist of carbonate rocks, limestones and dolomite...
ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION IN FACIES CLASSIFICATION WITH UNCERTAIN LOG-DATA
ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION IN FACIES CLASSIFICATION WITH UNCERTAIN LOG-DATA
Log-facies classification aims to predict a vertical profile of facies at well location with log readings or rock properties calculated in the formation evaluation and/or rock-phys...
Late Mississippian and Pennsylvanian Sediments of Ouachita Facies, Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas
Late Mississippian and Pennsylvanian Sediments of Ouachita Facies, Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas
Abstract
Sedimentary rocks of Ouachita facies are here defined as rocks lithologically similar and strati-graphically equivalent to sedimentary and low-grade meta-se...

