Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
View through CrossRef
Amid increasing interest in enhanced oil recovery and carbon geological sequestration programs, improved static reservoir lithofacies models are emerging as a requirement for well-guided project management. Building reservoir models can leverage seismic attribute clustering for seismic facies mapping. One challenge is that machine learning (ML) seismic facies mapping is prone to a wide range of equally possible outcomes when traditional unsupervised ML classification is used. There is a need to constrain ML seismic facies outcomes to limit the predicted seismic facies to those that meet the requirements of geological plausibility for a given depositional setting. To this end, this study utilizes an unsupervised comparative hierarchical and K-means ML classification of the whole 3D seismic data spectrum and a suite of spectral bands to overcome the cluster “facies” number uncertainty in ML data partition algorithms. This comparative ML, which was leveraged with seismic resolution data preconditioning, predicted geologically plausible seismic facies, i.e., seismic facies with spatial continuity, consistent morphology across seismic bands, and two ML algorithms. Furthermore, the variation of seismic facies classes was validated against observed lithofacies at well locations for the Mississippian carbonates of Kansas. The study provides a benchmark for both unsupervised ML seismic facies clustering and an understanding of seismic facies implications for reservoir/saline-aquifer aspects in building reliable static reservoir models. Three-dimensional seismic reflection P-wave data and a suite of well logs and drilling reports constitute the data for predicting seismic facies based on seismic attribute input to hierarchical analysis and K-means clustering models. The results of seismic facies, six facies clusters, are analyzed in integration with the target-interval mineralogy and reservoir porosity. The study unravels the nature of the seismic (litho) facies interplay with porosity and sheds light on interpreting unsupervised machine learning facies in tandem with both reservoir porosity and estimated (Umaa-RHOmaa) mineralogy.
Title: Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Description:
Amid increasing interest in enhanced oil recovery and carbon geological sequestration programs, improved static reservoir lithofacies models are emerging as a requirement for well-guided project management.
Building reservoir models can leverage seismic attribute clustering for seismic facies mapping.
One challenge is that machine learning (ML) seismic facies mapping is prone to a wide range of equally possible outcomes when traditional unsupervised ML classification is used.
There is a need to constrain ML seismic facies outcomes to limit the predicted seismic facies to those that meet the requirements of geological plausibility for a given depositional setting.
To this end, this study utilizes an unsupervised comparative hierarchical and K-means ML classification of the whole 3D seismic data spectrum and a suite of spectral bands to overcome the cluster “facies” number uncertainty in ML data partition algorithms.
This comparative ML, which was leveraged with seismic resolution data preconditioning, predicted geologically plausible seismic facies, i.
e.
, seismic facies with spatial continuity, consistent morphology across seismic bands, and two ML algorithms.
Furthermore, the variation of seismic facies classes was validated against observed lithofacies at well locations for the Mississippian carbonates of Kansas.
The study provides a benchmark for both unsupervised ML seismic facies clustering and an understanding of seismic facies implications for reservoir/saline-aquifer aspects in building reliable static reservoir models.
Three-dimensional seismic reflection P-wave data and a suite of well logs and drilling reports constitute the data for predicting seismic facies based on seismic attribute input to hierarchical analysis and K-means clustering models.
The results of seismic facies, six facies clusters, are analyzed in integration with the target-interval mineralogy and reservoir porosity.
The study unravels the nature of the seismic (litho) facies interplay with porosity and sheds light on interpreting unsupervised machine learning facies in tandem with both reservoir porosity and estimated (Umaa-RHOmaa) mineralogy.
Related Results
Incorporating seismic characterization results into Bul Hanine geological model
Incorporating seismic characterization results into Bul Hanine geological model
Abstract
Bul Hanine field is located offshore Qatar with primary oil production from the Reservoir-X carbonates. In 2005 and 2006, Qatar Petroleum recognized that...
Sequence Stratigraphy and Depositional Controls of Nahr Umr Iron-Rich Sheet Sands in a Unique Mid Cretaceous Reservoir (Offshore Qatar)
Sequence Stratigraphy and Depositional Controls of Nahr Umr Iron-Rich Sheet Sands in a Unique Mid Cretaceous Reservoir (Offshore Qatar)
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Summary
The Nahr Umr Formation forms...
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Carbonate Depositional Sequences and Systems Tracts—Responses of Carbonate Platforms to Relative Sea-Level Changes
Abstract
Standard carbonate facies models are widely used to interpret paleoenvironments, but they do not address how carbonate platforms are affected by relative...
Seismic Motion Inversion Based on Geological Conditioning and Its Application in Thin Reservoir Prediction, Middle East
Seismic Motion Inversion Based on Geological Conditioning and Its Application in Thin Reservoir Prediction, Middle East
Abstract
With the development of exploration and development, thin reservoir prediction is becoming more and more important. However, due to the limit of seismic res...
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
Abstract. Seismic facies classification is crucial for seismic stratigraphic interpretation and hydrocarbon reservoir characterization but remains a tedious and time-consuming task ...
Rock Physics Modelling and Stochastic Seismic Inversion to Predict Reservoir Properties and Quantify Uncertainties of a Complex Upper Jurassic Carbonate Reservoir From Offshore Abu Dhabi
Rock Physics Modelling and Stochastic Seismic Inversion to Predict Reservoir Properties and Quantify Uncertainties of a Complex Upper Jurassic Carbonate Reservoir From Offshore Abu Dhabi
Abstract
The need to understand field-scale reservoir heterogeneity using seismic data requires implementing advanced solutions such as stochastic seismic inversion ...
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Lithological and Petrophysical Parameters in Hydrocarbon Exploration: A Case Study from the Carpathian Foredeep
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Lithological and Petrophysical Parameters in Hydrocarbon Exploration: A Case Study from the Carpathian Foredeep
This study presents a novel approach to the parametrization of 3D PETRO FACIES and SEISMO FACIES using supervised and unsupervised learning, supported by a coherent structural and ...
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a stochastic seismic inversion algorithm based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation. The suggested inversion ...

