Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evolution mechanism of conflict between pedestrian and vehicle based on evolutionary game theory
View through CrossRef
When pedestrian and vehicle are in conflict, they will pass at a certain probability after they have made a simple judgment respectively. According to the actual situation of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle, the concept of basic payoff, conflict loss, waiting loss and mutual avoiding loss are put forward. A game matrix of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle is consequently established. Then the evolutionary analysis paradigm is introduced, and the dynamic model of the conflict evolution between pedestrian and vehicle is established. After that, the position and stability of the equilibrium point and the evolution mechanism of the system in different traffic situations are analyzed in detail. It is found that the relative size between conflict loss and waiting loss of pedestrian and vehicle are different, corresponding to different evolution directions of the system. The possible evolutionary directions include “vehicles first”, “pedestrians first”, “neither vehicles nor pedestrians goes first”, “vehicles and pedestrians do not yield to each other”. In addition, in this paper, we define the traffic concept of opportunity loss, and analyze the sensitivity of the system to the mutual avoiding loss and the opportunity loss of pedestrian and vehicle. It is found that the increasing of the mutually avoiding loss of pedestrian or vehicle has a positive effect on improving the probability of each passing conflict zone, but it has a negative effect on reducing the probability of each passing conflict zone. On the other hand, the effect of opportunity loss is just the opposite to the mutual avoiding loss. The dynamic model established in this paper can provide a theoretical basis for the macro control of the conflict evolution direction between pedestrian and vehicle. For instance, the current conflict situation between pedestrian and vehicle in a city is “vehicles first”. For promoting the traffic civilization, the transportation officials hope to change the current conflict situation to realize the “pedestrians first”. According to the model established in this paper, some parameters of the game matrix on the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle can be changed by formulating relevant highway traffic regulations to adjust the evolution direction of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle.
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Title: Evolution mechanism of conflict between pedestrian and vehicle based on evolutionary game theory
Description:
When pedestrian and vehicle are in conflict, they will pass at a certain probability after they have made a simple judgment respectively.
According to the actual situation of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle, the concept of basic payoff, conflict loss, waiting loss and mutual avoiding loss are put forward.
A game matrix of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle is consequently established.
Then the evolutionary analysis paradigm is introduced, and the dynamic model of the conflict evolution between pedestrian and vehicle is established.
After that, the position and stability of the equilibrium point and the evolution mechanism of the system in different traffic situations are analyzed in detail.
It is found that the relative size between conflict loss and waiting loss of pedestrian and vehicle are different, corresponding to different evolution directions of the system.
The possible evolutionary directions include “vehicles first”, “pedestrians first”, “neither vehicles nor pedestrians goes first”, “vehicles and pedestrians do not yield to each other”.
In addition, in this paper, we define the traffic concept of opportunity loss, and analyze the sensitivity of the system to the mutual avoiding loss and the opportunity loss of pedestrian and vehicle.
It is found that the increasing of the mutually avoiding loss of pedestrian or vehicle has a positive effect on improving the probability of each passing conflict zone, but it has a negative effect on reducing the probability of each passing conflict zone.
On the other hand, the effect of opportunity loss is just the opposite to the mutual avoiding loss.
The dynamic model established in this paper can provide a theoretical basis for the macro control of the conflict evolution direction between pedestrian and vehicle.
For instance, the current conflict situation between pedestrian and vehicle in a city is “vehicles first”.
For promoting the traffic civilization, the transportation officials hope to change the current conflict situation to realize the “pedestrians first”.
According to the model established in this paper, some parameters of the game matrix on the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle can be changed by formulating relevant highway traffic regulations to adjust the evolution direction of the conflict between pedestrian and vehicle.
Related Results
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
EVALUASI KONSEP RAMAH PEJALAN KAKI PADA PEDESTRIAN MALIOBORO DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONSEP WALKABILITY
EVALUASI KONSEP RAMAH PEJALAN KAKI PADA PEDESTRIAN MALIOBORO DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONSEP WALKABILITY
Abstract: Malioboro Pedestrian is located in the tourist area of Malioboro, which has been arranged by the Yogyakarta Regional Government. The arrangement carried out applies the c...
Modeling and simulation on interaction between pedestrians and a vehicle in a channel
Modeling and simulation on interaction between pedestrians and a vehicle in a channel
The mixed traffic flow composed of pedestrians and vehicles shows distinct features that a single kind of traffic flow does not have. In this paper, the motion of a vehicle is desc...
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Solomon’s article and Binmore’s response exemplify a standard exchange between the game theorist and those critical of applying game theory to ethics. The critic of game theory lis...
Evolution and the cell
Evolution and the cell
Genotype to phenotype, and back again
Evolution is intimately linked to biology at the cellular scale- evolutionary processes act on the very genetic material that is carried and ...
Conflict Management
Conflict Management
Any attempt to define conflict management is not an easy feat. It is a dynamic concept with blurry boundaries. In its most simple form, as Dennis Sandole says, conflict management ...
Overtaking risk assessment based on extreme value theory and intelligent network information
Overtaking risk assessment based on extreme value theory and intelligent network information
In order to evaluate the overtaking risk level of intelligent connected vehicles when providing different connected information, and to make up for the neglect of driver factors in...
Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict
Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict
PurposeThis study seeks to explore team goal orientation as a team characteristic that affects team members' self‐regulation, and conflict management approach as a self‐regulation ...


