Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Knowledge, Sentience and Receptivity: a paradigm of lifelong learning

View through CrossRef
This article aims to develop a paradigm of lifelong learning situations. The starting point is the EU‐Commission policy document where three kinds of learning situations are identified: formal, non‐formal and informal. The article tries to deepen this categorisation by searching for the underlying ontological and epistemological dimensions.The ontological dimension consists of three corresponding realities — formal, non‐formal and informal reality. The formal reality is a world of generalities. The non‐formal reality is a world of individualities – and not just of individual human beings.In the same way, the epistemological dimension consists of three corresponding kinds of knowledge: formal, non‐formal and informal. Formal knowledge is a knowing you can formulate, basically as concepts in thoughts possible to formulate in words. Non‐formal knowledge consists of the learner's ability to see and sense what an actual event shows and (literally) make sense‐ible. It is a circumstantial knowledge.As for informal knowledge, you cannot have that ability. But, in the moment of happening, the event will give you this ability to see and sense what to do and how to do — as a whim or fancy from nowhere. Informal knowledge is epiphanic.These two dimensions form a nine field paradigm of different kinds of learning settings. In relation to the formal, non‐formal and informal reality the conceptual knowledge will be produced in the academic setting; the learning setting of conceptualising reflection; the learning setting of ignorance. The circumstantial knowledge will be developed in the master‐apprentice learning setting; the learning setting of trial and error; the setting of accidental learning. The epiphanic knowledge will be revealed in the learning setting of self‐evident clearness; the learning setting of individual unique simplicity; the learning setting of vivifying activities.
Title: Knowledge, Sentience and Receptivity: a paradigm of lifelong learning
Description:
This article aims to develop a paradigm of lifelong learning situations.
The starting point is the EU‐Commission policy document where three kinds of learning situations are identified: formal, non‐formal and informal.
The article tries to deepen this categorisation by searching for the underlying ontological and epistemological dimensions.
The ontological dimension consists of three corresponding realities — formal, non‐formal and informal reality.
The formal reality is a world of generalities.
The non‐formal reality is a world of individualities – and not just of individual human beings.
In the same way, the epistemological dimension consists of three corresponding kinds of knowledge: formal, non‐formal and informal.
Formal knowledge is a knowing you can formulate, basically as concepts in thoughts possible to formulate in words.
Non‐formal knowledge consists of the learner's ability to see and sense what an actual event shows and (literally) make sense‐ible.
It is a circumstantial knowledge.
As for informal knowledge, you cannot have that ability.
But, in the moment of happening, the event will give you this ability to see and sense what to do and how to do — as a whim or fancy from nowhere.
Informal knowledge is epiphanic.
These two dimensions form a nine field paradigm of different kinds of learning settings.
In relation to the formal, non‐formal and informal reality the conceptual knowledge will be produced in the academic setting; the learning setting of conceptualising reflection; the learning setting of ignorance.
The circumstantial knowledge will be developed in the master‐apprentice learning setting; the learning setting of trial and error; the setting of accidental learning.
The epiphanic knowledge will be revealed in the learning setting of self‐evident clearness; the learning setting of individual unique simplicity; the learning setting of vivifying activities.

Related Results

Searching for Animal Sentience: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature
Searching for Animal Sentience: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature
Knowledge of animal sentience is fundamental to many disciplines and imperative to the animal welfare movement. In this review, we examined what is being explored and discussed, re...
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, ...
Lifelong Learning in Confucius Philosophical Perspective
Lifelong Learning in Confucius Philosophical Perspective
The research article “Lifelong Learning in Confucius Philosophical Perspective” has three objectives: 1. To study UNESCO's lifelong learning concept. 2. To explore the concept of l...
Minds, Machines, and Molecules
Minds, Machines, and Molecules
Recent debates about the biological and evolutionary conditions for sentience have generated a renewed interest in fine-grained functionalism. According to one such account advance...
Sentience-based event structure
Sentience-based event structure
In Blackfoot, a Plains Algonquian language spoken in Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA, sentience, rather than telicity, is a primary determinant of argument structure. Subjects of...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...

Back to Top