Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bacteremia, Central Catheters, and Neonates: When to Pull the Line

View through CrossRef
Objectives. Physicians who treat neonates who become bacteremic while dependent on central venous catheters face a serious and common dilemma. We sought 1) to evaluate the relationship between central venous catheter removal and outcome in bacteremic neonates, 2) to determine species of bacteria that are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications if the central catheter is not removed promptly, and 3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for central catheter management. Method. A retrospective cohort study of all neonates who had central venous access and developed bacteremia between July 1, 1995, and July 31, 1999, was conducted in the Duke University neonatal intensive care unit. Results. The outcome for patients in whom the central catheter was not removed within 24 hours of organism identification was significantly worse (odds ratio = 9.8) than it was for those whose catheters were removed promptly. For patients who were infected withStaphylococcus aureus or with nonenteric Gram-negative rods, delayed removal of the central catheter was associated with complicated bacteremia. Catheter sterilization was attempted in 27 neonates who were infected with enteric Gram-negative rods; only 10 of these infants retained their catheters without infection-related complications. Infants who had 4 consecutive blood cultures that were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were at significantly increased risk for end-organ damage and death, compared with infants who had 3 or fewer positive blood culture for CoNS (odds ratio = 29.58). Conclusions. Bacteremic infants experienced fewer infection-related complications when the central catheter was removed promptly. One positive blood culture for Saureus or a Gram-negative rod warrants central line removal in a neonate. Clinicians who are faced with a neonate who has 1 positive culture for CoNS may attempt medical management without central catheter removal, but documentation of subsequent negative blood cultures is crucial. Once a neonate has 3 positive blood cultures for CoNS, the central catheter should be removed.central line, neonate, bacteremia, bacteria, umbilical catheter, Broviac, percutaneous.
Title: Bacteremia, Central Catheters, and Neonates: When to Pull the Line
Description:
Objectives.
Physicians who treat neonates who become bacteremic while dependent on central venous catheters face a serious and common dilemma.
We sought 1) to evaluate the relationship between central venous catheter removal and outcome in bacteremic neonates, 2) to determine species of bacteria that are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications if the central catheter is not removed promptly, and 3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for central catheter management.
Method.
A retrospective cohort study of all neonates who had central venous access and developed bacteremia between July 1, 1995, and July 31, 1999, was conducted in the Duke University neonatal intensive care unit.
Results.
The outcome for patients in whom the central catheter was not removed within 24 hours of organism identification was significantly worse (odds ratio = 9.
8) than it was for those whose catheters were removed promptly.
For patients who were infected withStaphylococcus aureus or with nonenteric Gram-negative rods, delayed removal of the central catheter was associated with complicated bacteremia.
Catheter sterilization was attempted in 27 neonates who were infected with enteric Gram-negative rods; only 10 of these infants retained their catheters without infection-related complications.
Infants who had 4 consecutive blood cultures that were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were at significantly increased risk for end-organ damage and death, compared with infants who had 3 or fewer positive blood culture for CoNS (odds ratio = 29.
58).
Conclusions.
Bacteremic infants experienced fewer infection-related complications when the central catheter was removed promptly.
One positive blood culture for Saureus or a Gram-negative rod warrants central line removal in a neonate.
Clinicians who are faced with a neonate who has 1 positive culture for CoNS may attempt medical management without central catheter removal, but documentation of subsequent negative blood cultures is crucial.
Once a neonate has 3 positive blood cultures for CoNS, the central catheter should be removed.
central line, neonate, bacteremia, bacteria, umbilical catheter, Broviac, percutaneous.

Related Results

Large Bore Catheters with Surface Treatments versus Untreated Catheters for Blood Access
Large Bore Catheters with Surface Treatments versus Untreated Catheters for Blood Access
Infection, thrombosis, and stenosis are among the most frequent complications associated with blood contacting catheters. Because these problems are usually related to surface prop...
Surface Treated Catheters with Ion Beam Based Process for Blood Access
Surface Treated Catheters with Ion Beam Based Process for Blood Access
Abstract: Infection, thrombosis, and stenosis are among the most frequent complications associated with blood contacting catheters. Because these problems are usually related to su...
TOGI Pull-In and Connection Systems
TOGI Pull-In and Connection Systems
ABSTRACT A unique and prototype pull-in and connection system were developed for the TOGI project. The offshore pull-in of the 20" pipeline and service lines and ...

Back to Top