Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bacteremia, Central Catheters, and Neonates: When to Pull the Line
View through CrossRef
Objectives.
Physicians who treat neonates who become bacteremic while dependent on central venous catheters face a serious and common dilemma. We sought 1) to evaluate the relationship between central venous catheter removal and outcome in bacteremic neonates, 2) to determine species of bacteria that are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications if the central catheter is not removed promptly, and 3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for central catheter management.
Method.
A retrospective cohort study of all neonates who had central venous access and developed bacteremia between July 1, 1995, and July 31, 1999, was conducted in the Duke University neonatal intensive care unit.
Results.
The outcome for patients in whom the central catheter was not removed within 24 hours of organism identification was significantly worse (odds ratio = 9.8) than it was for those whose catheters were removed promptly. For patients who were infected withStaphylococcus aureus or with nonenteric Gram-negative rods, delayed removal of the central catheter was associated with complicated bacteremia. Catheter sterilization was attempted in 27 neonates who were infected with enteric Gram-negative rods; only 10 of these infants retained their catheters without infection-related complications. Infants who had 4 consecutive blood cultures that were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were at significantly increased risk for end-organ damage and death, compared with infants who had 3 or fewer positive blood culture for CoNS (odds ratio = 29.58).
Conclusions.
Bacteremic infants experienced fewer infection-related complications when the central catheter was removed promptly. One positive blood culture for Saureus or a Gram-negative rod warrants central line removal in a neonate. Clinicians who are faced with a neonate who has 1 positive culture for CoNS may attempt medical management without central catheter removal, but documentation of subsequent negative blood cultures is crucial. Once a neonate has 3 positive blood cultures for CoNS, the central catheter should be removed.central line, neonate, bacteremia, bacteria, umbilical catheter, Broviac, percutaneous.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Title: Bacteremia, Central Catheters, and Neonates: When to Pull the Line
Description:
Objectives.
Physicians who treat neonates who become bacteremic while dependent on central venous catheters face a serious and common dilemma.
We sought 1) to evaluate the relationship between central venous catheter removal and outcome in bacteremic neonates, 2) to determine species of bacteria that are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications if the central catheter is not removed promptly, and 3) to provide evidence-based recommendations for central catheter management.
Method.
A retrospective cohort study of all neonates who had central venous access and developed bacteremia between July 1, 1995, and July 31, 1999, was conducted in the Duke University neonatal intensive care unit.
Results.
The outcome for patients in whom the central catheter was not removed within 24 hours of organism identification was significantly worse (odds ratio = 9.
8) than it was for those whose catheters were removed promptly.
For patients who were infected withStaphylococcus aureus or with nonenteric Gram-negative rods, delayed removal of the central catheter was associated with complicated bacteremia.
Catheter sterilization was attempted in 27 neonates who were infected with enteric Gram-negative rods; only 10 of these infants retained their catheters without infection-related complications.
Infants who had 4 consecutive blood cultures that were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were at significantly increased risk for end-organ damage and death, compared with infants who had 3 or fewer positive blood culture for CoNS (odds ratio = 29.
58).
Conclusions.
Bacteremic infants experienced fewer infection-related complications when the central catheter was removed promptly.
One positive blood culture for Saureus or a Gram-negative rod warrants central line removal in a neonate.
Clinicians who are faced with a neonate who has 1 positive culture for CoNS may attempt medical management without central catheter removal, but documentation of subsequent negative blood cultures is crucial.
Once a neonate has 3 positive blood cultures for CoNS, the central catheter should be removed.
central line, neonate, bacteremia, bacteria, umbilical catheter, Broviac, percutaneous.
Related Results
659. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Bacteremia Following Portal Vein Embolization
659. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Bacteremia Following Portal Vein Embolization
Abstract
Background
Portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to induce liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. As ...
Large Bore Catheters with Surface Treatments versus Untreated Catheters for Blood Access
Large Bore Catheters with Surface Treatments versus Untreated Catheters for Blood Access
Infection, thrombosis, and stenosis are among the most frequent complications associated with blood contacting catheters. Because these problems are usually related to surface prop...
Surface Treated Catheters with Ion Beam Based Process for Blood Access
Surface Treated Catheters with Ion Beam Based Process for Blood Access
Abstract: Infection, thrombosis, and stenosis are among the most frequent complications associated with blood contacting catheters. Because these problems are usually related to su...
1859. Significance of Bacteremia in Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa
1859. Significance of Bacteremia in Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract
Background
Infection is one of the most common complications of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs). Pseudomonas ae...
TOGI Pull-In and Connection Systems
TOGI Pull-In and Connection Systems
ABSTRACT
A unique and prototype pull-in and connection system were developed for the TOGI project. The offshore pull-in of the 20" pipeline and service lines and ...
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacterales Compared to Carbapenem Susceptible Enterobacterales
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacterales Compared to Carbapenem Susceptible Enterobacterales
Abstract
BackgroundDue to shrinking therapeutic options, infections due to Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an urgent threat in healthcare systems. We compar...
211. Disease burden of bacteremia with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Korea
211. Disease burden of bacteremia with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Korea
Abstract
Background
Despite the importance of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) bacteremia, especially extended-spectrum β-la...
135. Clinical and Microbiologic Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteremia
135. Clinical and Microbiologic Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteremia
Abstract
Background
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection is an emerging clinical issue and shows high m...

