Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

MCQ MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS EXAMINATION WITHOUT ERRORS IN PHARMACOLOGY

View through CrossRef
Background: MCQs have been implemented by several medical institutes during the last few years. Maintaining thehigh quality of these MCQs is crucial. This study aims to assess the MCQ quality by identifying errors in the itemwriting of Bacha Khan Medical College’s pharmacy examinations.Study design: A cross-sectional descriptive StudyDuration and place of study: department of Pharmacology at Bacha Khan Medical College from Jan 2005to July 2005Methods: This analytical research assessed the item writing flaws (IWF) of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) interms of (a) issues about irrelevant difficulty and (b) issues about test wisdom, which were used in the Bacha KhanMedical College’s final pharmacology examinations. Every multiple-choice question was given a unique rating basedon its irrelevant difficulty and test knowledge. Grade 1 was assigned for no IWF, Grade 2 for one IWF, and Grade3 for several.Results: One hundred MCQs in all were examined. Most of the things were found to be correct in item writing.Of the MCQs of irrelevant difficulty, 75% had no IWF—ninety percent of the multiple-choice questions needed tohave test-wise problems.Conclusion: Even though the majority of the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were free of IWF, a significant portionhad errors. It is advised that each topic has a systematic faculty development process to raise the quality of MCQs.Key Words: Item Writing Flaws, MCQs Quality, Evaluation.
Title: MCQ MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS EXAMINATION WITHOUT ERRORS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Description:
Background: MCQs have been implemented by several medical institutes during the last few years.
Maintaining thehigh quality of these MCQs is crucial.
This study aims to assess the MCQ quality by identifying errors in the itemwriting of Bacha Khan Medical College’s pharmacy examinations.
Study design: A cross-sectional descriptive StudyDuration and place of study: department of Pharmacology at Bacha Khan Medical College from Jan 2005to July 2005Methods: This analytical research assessed the item writing flaws (IWF) of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) interms of (a) issues about irrelevant difficulty and (b) issues about test wisdom, which were used in the Bacha KhanMedical College’s final pharmacology examinations.
Every multiple-choice question was given a unique rating basedon its irrelevant difficulty and test knowledge.
Grade 1 was assigned for no IWF, Grade 2 for one IWF, and Grade3 for several.
Results: One hundred MCQs in all were examined.
Most of the things were found to be correct in item writing.
Of the MCQs of irrelevant difficulty, 75% had no IWF—ninety percent of the multiple-choice questions needed tohave test-wise problems.
Conclusion: Even though the majority of the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were free of IWF, a significant portionhad errors.
It is advised that each topic has a systematic faculty development process to raise the quality of MCQs.
Key Words: Item Writing Flaws, MCQs Quality, Evaluation.

Related Results

NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
IntroductionA medication error can be defined as “any error occurring in the medication use process” and focuses on problems with the delivery of medication to a patient [1]. Medic...
Use of Objective Tests in Examining Law Courses at Daystar University
Use of Objective Tests in Examining Law Courses at Daystar University
The use of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in law schools has not gained widespread acceptance, unlike in medical schools where they enjoy global usage. Law Schools traditionally ...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Comparison of ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo and Human Performance in taking the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) Exam
Comparison of ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo and Human Performance in taking the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) Exam
Abstract Background/Objectives: This paper aims to assess ChatGPT’s performance in answering European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) examination papers and to compa...
Enhancing Item Writing Skills In Undergraduate Dental FacultyThrough Constructive Feedback
Enhancing Item Writing Skills In Undergraduate Dental FacultyThrough Constructive Feedback
Objective: To evaluate the improvement in multiple-choice question (MCQ) writing skills among undergraduatedental faculty and to assess the impact of feedback on the quality of MCQ...
TO STUDY OF CHARACTERISTICS OF OBJECTIVE MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST FOR MEDICAL MODULES
TO STUDY OF CHARACTERISTICS OF OBJECTIVE MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST FOR MEDICAL MODULES
Background: The objective multiple-choice test is an assessment method that has been applied widely in universities. The meticulous judgment of complication and differentiation lev...
The Effect of Metacognition Function of Elderly Individuals on Healthy Aging Levels
The Effect of Metacognition Function of Elderly Individuals on Healthy Aging Levels
Abstract Aim: To determine the relationship between elderly individuals’ metacognition and health aging. Meth...

Back to Top