Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluating Functional and Non-Functional Distractors and Their Relationship with Difficulty and Discrimination Indices in Four-Option Multiple-Choice Questions

View through CrossRef
Multiple-choice questions-one best answer (MCQ-OBA) is the most frequently accepted assessment tool in Iran’s medical universities. Writing functional distractors (FDs) is an important aspect of framing MCQ-OBA. This study aimed to assess FDs and non-functional distractors (NFDs) in MCQ-OBA and the association of distractor efficiency with difficulty and discrimination indices. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Immunology, the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. A total of 734 MCQ-OBA were reviewed, including 2,936 options (2,202 distractors and 734 correct responses). NFDs were defined as options chosen by <5% of examinees. Of the 734 MCQ-OBAs, 265 (36.1%) had 0 NFDs, 231 (31.5%) had 1 NFD, 146 (19.9%) had 2 NFDs, and 92 (12.5%) had 3 NFDs. The Pearson’s correlation showed a significant relationship between the difficulty index and the number of NFDs (r = 0.453; P < 0.0001). However, the correlation between the discrimination index and the number of NFDs was insignificant (r = 0.055; P = 0.135). The findings revealed that NFDs inversely affected the test quality of items. Items with more NFDs were easier and had poorer discriminatory power. The distractor function analysis and revision of NFDs serve as an important method to improve the quality of MCQ-OBA.
Title: Evaluating Functional and Non-Functional Distractors and Their Relationship with Difficulty and Discrimination Indices in Four-Option Multiple-Choice Questions
Description:
Multiple-choice questions-one best answer (MCQ-OBA) is the most frequently accepted assessment tool in Iran’s medical universities.
Writing functional distractors (FDs) is an important aspect of framing MCQ-OBA.
This study aimed to assess FDs and non-functional distractors (NFDs) in MCQ-OBA and the association of distractor efficiency with difficulty and discrimination indices.
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Immunology, the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.
A total of 734 MCQ-OBA were reviewed, including 2,936 options (2,202 distractors and 734 correct responses).
NFDs were defined as options chosen by <5% of examinees.
Of the 734 MCQ-OBAs, 265 (36.
1%) had 0 NFDs, 231 (31.
5%) had 1 NFD, 146 (19.
9%) had 2 NFDs, and 92 (12.
5%) had 3 NFDs.
The Pearson’s correlation showed a significant relationship between the difficulty index and the number of NFDs (r = 0.
453; P < 0.
0001).
However, the correlation between the discrimination index and the number of NFDs was insignificant (r = 0.
055; P = 0.
135).
The findings revealed that NFDs inversely affected the test quality of items.
Items with more NFDs were easier and had poorer discriminatory power.
The distractor function analysis and revision of NFDs serve as an important method to improve the quality of MCQ-OBA.

Related Results

Assessment of distractor efficiency of MCQS in item analysis.
Assessment of distractor efficiency of MCQS in item analysis.
Objective: To assess the distractor efficiency of the multiple-choice questions and find out the structural flaws in the items that negatively impact the distractor efficiency. Stu...
The Role of Target Salience in Crowding
The Role of Target Salience in Crowding
We studied ‘crowding’ in the parafovea using orientation identification of a Gabor target as the task, and flanking Gabors on an isoeccentric circle as distractors. Orientation-dis...
Attentional Alertness Does Not Facilitate Rejecting Distractors
Attentional Alertness Does Not Facilitate Rejecting Distractors
Increased phasic alertness is a useful mechanism that temporarily improves many aspects of behavior, including visual capacities. The present study examined the effect of increased...
Fear not! Anxiety biases attentional enhancement of threat without impairing working memory filtering
Fear not! Anxiety biases attentional enhancement of threat without impairing working memory filtering
Individuals with anxiety have attentional biases toward threat-related distractors. This deficit in attentional control has been shown to impact visual working memory (VWM) filteri...
Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions of Anatomy at Aziz Fatimah Medical and Dental College, Faisalabad
Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions of Anatomy at Aziz Fatimah Medical and Dental College, Faisalabad
Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate MCQs in send up exam of 2nd year MBBS. To discard or change poor items with low discriminatory index, very easy and very difficult i...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Generating Distractors for Reading Comprehension Questions from Real Examinations
Generating Distractors for Reading Comprehension Questions from Real Examinations
We investigate the task of distractor generation for multiple choice reading comprehension questions from examinations. In contrast to all previous works, we do not aim at preparin...
Third Generation Discrimination: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Decision Making in Gender Discrimination Litigation
Third Generation Discrimination: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Decision Making in Gender Discrimination Litigation
In this progressive era of #MeToo and other movements which highlight the reality of women’s experiences in the workplace and other settings, the question arises as to why discrimi...

Back to Top