Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision. Methods Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision. The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours. Results Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB. Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R2 = 20.6; P = 0.006). Conclusion DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
Description:
Abstract Background Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision.
Methods Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision.
The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine.
The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours.
Results Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB.
Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.
01).
Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R2 = 20.
6; P = 0.
006).
Conclusion DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period.

Related Results

Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Postoperative skeletal pain
Postoperative skeletal pain
This thesis attempts to better understand postoperative skeletal pain, quantify its severity and provide directions for its improved treatment. Chapter 2 described the current cl...
Comparison of the Efficacy of Peri-Operative Use of Bupivacaine with Corticosteroids Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Lumbar Disc Disease Surgery
Comparison of the Efficacy of Peri-Operative Use of Bupivacaine with Corticosteroids Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Lumbar Disc Disease Surgery
Objectives:  To compare the efficacy of peri-operative use of bupivacaine with corticosteroids versus bupivacaine alone in lumbar disc disease surgery. Materials and Methods:  This...

Back to Top