Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele
View through CrossRef
AbstractAim Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, previously described for external rectal prolapse, was evaluated for symptomatic complex rectocoele.Method From January 2004 to December 2008, 84 (50.9%) patients (mean age 64 ± 5 years) underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for symptomatic complex rectocoele, confirmed preoperatively on dynamic defaecography, with 26 (31%) patients having a concurrent cystocoele. The operative technique was standardized, and those with cystocoele underwent bladder mesh suspension during the same procedure. Prospectively collected data were analysed for preoperative symptoms, operative and functional results [constipation, faecal incontinence (FI), dyspareunia and satisfaction score].Results The conversion rate was 3.6% and perioperative morbidity 4.8% with no mortality. At a median follow up of 29 (4–59) months, there was a significant decrease in vaginal discomfort (86–20%) and obstructed defaecation symptoms (83–46%), P < 0.001. There was no significant change in FI (20–16%), no worsening of preoperative symptoms or new complaints of constipation, dyspareunia or FI. Overall, 88% of patients reported an improvement in overall well‐being.Conclusion Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective method for treating symptomatic complex rectocoele.
Title: Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele
Description:
AbstractAim Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, previously described for external rectal prolapse, was evaluated for symptomatic complex rectocoele.
Method From January 2004 to December 2008, 84 (50.
9%) patients (mean age 64 ± 5 years) underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for symptomatic complex rectocoele, confirmed preoperatively on dynamic defaecography, with 26 (31%) patients having a concurrent cystocoele.
The operative technique was standardized, and those with cystocoele underwent bladder mesh suspension during the same procedure.
Prospectively collected data were analysed for preoperative symptoms, operative and functional results [constipation, faecal incontinence (FI), dyspareunia and satisfaction score].
Results The conversion rate was 3.
6% and perioperative morbidity 4.
8% with no mortality.
At a median follow up of 29 (4–59) months, there was a significant decrease in vaginal discomfort (86–20%) and obstructed defaecation symptoms (83–46%), P < 0.
001.
There was no significant change in FI (20–16%), no worsening of preoperative symptoms or new complaints of constipation, dyspareunia or FI.
Overall, 88% of patients reported an improvement in overall well‐being.
Conclusion Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective method for treating symptomatic complex rectocoele.
Related Results
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome: Functional Outcomes after Surgery
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome: Functional Outcomes after Surgery
Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread but poorly understood complex multifactorial illness that is initially treated with dietary changes, pelvic floor exercises an...
Assessment of results of suture rectopexy technique for obstructed defecation syndrome, analysis of recurrent factors
Assessment of results of suture rectopexy technique for obstructed defecation syndrome, analysis of recurrent factors
Abstract
Introduction: Based on the obliterative suture technique or stapled transanal rectal resection procedure (STARR technique), Nguyen Trung Vinh introduced Suture Rectopexy T...
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort study
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort study
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive techniques have become the standard of care for treating rectal prolapse through a transabdominal approach. However, there is limite...
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has become a popular Internet of Things (IoT) technology. However, it was originally designed to only support the star topology. This PhD thesis investig...
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Objective:Over the last two decades the main surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was the insertion of non-absorbable me...
Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre
Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre
Abstract
Objective
Over the last two decades one of the main surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP...
Long-Term Recurrence and the Safety of Mesh Use After Emergency Ventral Hernia Repair
Long-Term Recurrence and the Safety of Mesh Use After Emergency Ventral Hernia Repair
Importance
Wide variation exists in how surgeons approach the repair of emergent presentation of ventral hernias, with many opting to avoid mesh in the acute se...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...

