Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does Ventral Rectopexy Improve Pelvic Floor Function in the Long Term?
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND:Information is needed on long-term functional results, sequelas, and outcome predictors for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term function postventral rectopexy in patients with external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse in a large cohort and to identify the possible effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details on patient-reported outcomes.DESIGN:This was a retrospective review with a cross-sectional questionnaire study.SETTINGS:Data were collated from prospectively collected registries in 2 university and 2 central hospitals in Finland.PATIENTS:All 508 consecutive patients treated with ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in 2005 to 2013 were included.INTERVENTIONS:A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms and effect on quality of life was used.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Defecatory function measured by the Wexner score, the obstructive defecation score, and subjective symptom and quality-of-life evaluation using the visual analog scale were included. The effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details were assessed using multivariate analysis.RESULTS:The questionnaire response rate was 70.7% (330/467 living patients) with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The mean Wexner scores were 7.0 (SD = 6.1) and 6.9 (SD = 5.6), and the mean obstructive defecation scores were 9.7 (SD = 7.6) and 12.3 (SD = 8.0) for patients presenting with external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse. Subjective symptom relief was experienced by 76% and reported more often by patients with external rectal prolapse than with internal rectal prolapse (86% vs 68%;p< 0.001). Complications occurred in 11.4% of patients, and the recurrence rate for rectal prolapse was 7.1%.LIMITATIONS:This study was limited by its lack of preoperative functional data and suboptimal questionnaire response rate.CONCLUSIONS:Ventral mesh rectopexy effectively treats posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with a low complication rate and an acceptable recurrence rate. Patients with external rectal prolapse benefit more from the operation than those with symptomatic internal rectal prolapse. SeeVideo Abstractat http://links.lww.com/DCR/A479.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Does Ventral Rectopexy Improve Pelvic Floor Function in the Long Term?
Description:
BACKGROUND:Information is needed on long-term functional results, sequelas, and outcome predictors for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.
OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term function postventral rectopexy in patients with external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse in a large cohort and to identify the possible effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details on patient-reported outcomes.
DESIGN:This was a retrospective review with a cross-sectional questionnaire study.
SETTINGS:Data were collated from prospectively collected registries in 2 university and 2 central hospitals in Finland.
PATIENTS:All 508 consecutive patients treated with ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in 2005 to 2013 were included.
INTERVENTIONS:A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms and effect on quality of life was used.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Defecatory function measured by the Wexner score, the obstructive defecation score, and subjective symptom and quality-of-life evaluation using the visual analog scale were included.
The effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details were assessed using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS:The questionnaire response rate was 70.
7% (330/467 living patients) with a median follow-up time of 44 months.
The mean Wexner scores were 7.
0 (SD = 6.
1) and 6.
9 (SD = 5.
6), and the mean obstructive defecation scores were 9.
7 (SD = 7.
6) and 12.
3 (SD = 8.
0) for patients presenting with external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse.
Subjective symptom relief was experienced by 76% and reported more often by patients with external rectal prolapse than with internal rectal prolapse (86% vs 68%;p< 0.
001).
Complications occurred in 11.
4% of patients, and the recurrence rate for rectal prolapse was 7.
1%.
LIMITATIONS:This study was limited by its lack of preoperative functional data and suboptimal questionnaire response rate.
CONCLUSIONS:Ventral mesh rectopexy effectively treats posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with a low complication rate and an acceptable recurrence rate.
Patients with external rectal prolapse benefit more from the operation than those with symptomatic internal rectal prolapse.
SeeVideo Abstractat http://links.
lww.
com/DCR/A479.
Related Results
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
Abstract
Introduction
Vestibulodynia, vulvar pain localized to the vestibule without an identifiable cause, has a multifactorial...
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome: Functional Outcomes after Surgery
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome: Functional Outcomes after Surgery
Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is a widespread but poorly understood complex multifactorial illness that is initially treated with dietary changes, pelvic floor exercises an...
The Muscle Cells in Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: Systematic Review
The Muscle Cells in Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: Systematic Review
Background/Aims: The pelvic floor muscles are important structures involved in pelvic floor tone, pelvic organ support, and continence. The aim of this study was to perform an upda...
Evaluasi KIPPas (Kartu Instrumen Prediktor Pangastuti) Jogja sebagai Instrumen Prediktor Disfungsi Dasar Panggul Pasca Persalinan Vaginal
Evaluasi KIPPas (Kartu Instrumen Prediktor Pangastuti) Jogja sebagai Instrumen Prediktor Disfungsi Dasar Panggul Pasca Persalinan Vaginal
Background: Postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction is pelvic floor disorder, which can be in the form of pelvic organ prolapse, urinary problem, defecation problem or sexual dysfuncti...
IMPACT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY ON PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION AND SEXUAL HEALTH IN POSTPARTUM WOMEN
IMPACT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY ON PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION AND SEXUAL HEALTH IN POSTPARTUM WOMEN
This study aims to investigate the impact of physical therapy on pelvic floor dysfunction and its subsequent effects on sexual function, incontinence, pelvic floor distress, and qu...
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort study
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort study
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive techniques have become the standard of care for treating rectal prolapse through a transabdominal approach. However, there is limite...
Prevalence, Knowledge and Awareness of Pelvic Floor Disorder among Pregnant Women in a Tertiary Centre, Malaysia
Prevalence, Knowledge and Awareness of Pelvic Floor Disorder among Pregnant Women in a Tertiary Centre, Malaysia
Pelvic floor disorders are common and of concern, as the majority of maternity healthcare providers seldom discuss this issue with patients compared to other antenatal issues. The ...
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
ABSTRACT
Duration, intensity, and management of pain and discomfort may all be affected by experience, personality, and medical and psychosocial comorbidities. A negative...

