Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

PS01.166: COLONIC INTERPOSITION FOR ESOPHAGEAL REPLACEMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The method of choice for esophageal replacement after esophagectomy for cancer is the gastric tube. However when the stomach is not available a colon graft interposition can be performed. The purpose of this retrospective study was to review our experience with colon interposition following esophagectomy for cancer and to assess the early surgical outcomes. Methods We reviewed clinical data from 26 consecutive patients who underwent colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer between January 1990 and December 2017 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. Outcomes were compared with data in international publications on colon interposition. Results There were 22 (85%) males and 4 females with a mean age of 56 years (range, 28 to 79 years). Indications were adenocarcinoma in 21 (81%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 5 (19%). Seven (30%) patients received neoadjuvant treatment: in 3 cases chemotherapy and in 4 patients chemoradiation. Transhiatal esophagectomy and transthoracic esophagectomy were performed in 21 (81%) and 5 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 389 min (range 120–660 min). The most common option for colon conduit was the left colon (63%). We performed hand-sewn anastomosis in the neck in all cases. Surgical morbidity was 65%, most commonly due to pulmonary complications. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (50%). One case graft necrosis were observed and 9 (35%) reoperations were necessary. In-hospital mortality was 15%. Conclusion Our results are in line with the literature and demonstrate that colon interposition after esophagectomy is feasible and, despite having a significant morbimortality, appears to be a valuable alternative for the challenging situation where the stomach is not available. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Title: PS01.166: COLONIC INTERPOSITION FOR ESOPHAGEAL REPLACEMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Description:
Abstract Background The method of choice for esophageal replacement after esophagectomy for cancer is the gastric tube.
However when the stomach is not available a colon graft interposition can be performed.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to review our experience with colon interposition following esophagectomy for cancer and to assess the early surgical outcomes.
Methods We reviewed clinical data from 26 consecutive patients who underwent colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer between January 1990 and December 2017 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
Outcomes were compared with data in international publications on colon interposition.
Results There were 22 (85%) males and 4 females with a mean age of 56 years (range, 28 to 79 years).
Indications were adenocarcinoma in 21 (81%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 5 (19%).
Seven (30%) patients received neoadjuvant treatment: in 3 cases chemotherapy and in 4 patients chemoradiation.
Transhiatal esophagectomy and transthoracic esophagectomy were performed in 21 (81%) and 5 patients, respectively.
The mean operative time was 389 min (range 120–660 min).
The most common option for colon conduit was the left colon (63%).
We performed hand-sewn anastomosis in the neck in all cases.
Surgical morbidity was 65%, most commonly due to pulmonary complications.
Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (50%).
One case graft necrosis were observed and 9 (35%) reoperations were necessary.
In-hospital mortality was 15%.
Conclusion Our results are in line with the literature and demonstrate that colon interposition after esophagectomy is feasible and, despite having a significant morbimortality, appears to be a valuable alternative for the challenging situation where the stomach is not available.
Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Related Results

Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tóm tắt Mục tiêu: Trình bày tổng quan về cắt thực quản thời hiện đại. Năm 1913, Franz John Torek (1861-1938) người Đức làm việc tại bệnh viện Lenox Hill, Newyork City, là người ...
596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Abstract Esophagectomy carries high rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was introduced more than 20 years ago offering ...
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
PURPOSE: In 1980, operative mortality for esophageal resection was 29%. Over the last 15 years, technical and critical care improvements contributed to the reduction of postoperati...
OUTCOMES OF IVOR-LEWIS AND MINIMAL INVASIVE MCKEOWN ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR LOWER AND MIDDLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER.
OUTCOMES OF IVOR-LEWIS AND MINIMAL INVASIVE MCKEOWN ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR LOWER AND MIDDLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER.
Background: Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Mckewon esophagectomy are used to treat esophageal cancer, and minimally invasive technique is increasingly adopted to lower morbidities an...
Abstracts for the 6th European Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility 19–21 NOVEMBER 1992 HOTEL MELIA BARCELONA, BARCELONA, SPAIN
Abstracts for the 6th European Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility 19–21 NOVEMBER 1992 HOTEL MELIA BARCELONA, BARCELONA, SPAIN
MOTOR RESPONSES OF HUMAN ILEUM TO TACHYKININS IN VITRO: EXISTENCE OF NK2 RECEPTORS AND RECEPTORS SPECIFIC FOR NEUROPEPTIDE GAMMA.INNERVATION OF THE MUSCULARIS MUCOSAE OF HUMAN COLO...
Robotic resection for esophageal cancer
Robotic resection for esophageal cancer
Summary Background In the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, complete tumor resection is the most important factor and determines long-term su...

Back to Top