Javascript must be enabled to continue!
596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Esophagectomy carries high rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was introduced more than 20 years ago offering all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and significantly reducing post-operative pulmonary and cardiac complications associated with open esophagectomy. Clinical and oncological outcomes are vastly improved standardizing this approach as inferior in the hand of experts. Herein, we aim to present our results of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer.
This is prospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction Siewert type I-II cancers. Operations included hybrid 2-stage esophagectomy (laparoscopic/open thoracotomic or open laparotomy/thoracoscopy) and 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (laparoscopic/thoracoscopic). Study included adult patients with no upper age limit (>18 years). All esophagectomies for benign disease, as well as emergency operations were excluded from the study. Primary endpoints were 30- and 90-day mortality rate, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, pulmonary complications, and length of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival rates respectively.
During an 8-year-period, n=350 consecutive patients underwent 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Our team has a cumulative experience of more than 300 open-esophagectomies. Since September 1st, 2013, hybrid 2-stage esophagectomy program was initiated. On September 1st, 2016, the program offered 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy in-all comers. Most patients were males. Anastomotic leak complicated 5.1% of the patients; 10% of the patients presented anastomotic stricture post-operatively, while pulmonary and cardiac complications reached up to 25 and 12% respectively. Medial LOS was 8 days. Median follow-up was 60 months. OS survival rate was 53 months and PFS was 48 months.
Advances in minimally invasive surgery can benefit all patients with esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction tumors. Hybrid and totally minimally invasive 2-stage esophagectomy are well established approaches, with safe and feasible profile in tertiary cancer centers. They can lead to significantly improved clinical and oncological outcomes comparing to open esophagectomy and its complications burden.
Title: 596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Description:
Abstract
Esophagectomy carries high rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality.
Minimally invasive esophagectomy was introduced more than 20 years ago offering all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and significantly reducing post-operative pulmonary and cardiac complications associated with open esophagectomy.
Clinical and oncological outcomes are vastly improved standardizing this approach as inferior in the hand of experts.
Herein, we aim to present our results of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer.
This is prospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction Siewert type I-II cancers.
Operations included hybrid 2-stage esophagectomy (laparoscopic/open thoracotomic or open laparotomy/thoracoscopy) and 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (laparoscopic/thoracoscopic).
Study included adult patients with no upper age limit (>18 years).
All esophagectomies for benign disease, as well as emergency operations were excluded from the study.
Primary endpoints were 30- and 90-day mortality rate, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, pulmonary complications, and length of hospital stay.
Secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival rates respectively.
During an 8-year-period, n=350 consecutive patients underwent 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer.
Our team has a cumulative experience of more than 300 open-esophagectomies.
Since September 1st, 2013, hybrid 2-stage esophagectomy program was initiated.
On September 1st, 2016, the program offered 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy in-all comers.
Most patients were males.
Anastomotic leak complicated 5.
1% of the patients; 10% of the patients presented anastomotic stricture post-operatively, while pulmonary and cardiac complications reached up to 25 and 12% respectively.
Medial LOS was 8 days.
Median follow-up was 60 months.
OS survival rate was 53 months and PFS was 48 months.
Advances in minimally invasive surgery can benefit all patients with esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction tumors.
Hybrid and totally minimally invasive 2-stage esophagectomy are well established approaches, with safe and feasible profile in tertiary cancer centers.
They can lead to significantly improved clinical and oncological outcomes comparing to open esophagectomy and its complications burden.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tóm tắt
Mục tiêu: Trình bày tổng quan về cắt thực quản thời hiện đại.
Năm 1913, Franz John Torek (1861-1938) người Đức làm việc tại bệnh viện Lenox Hill, Newyork City, là người ...
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive technique for esophagectomy has emerged as the standard of care for resectable esophageal...
587. ROLE OF THORACOSCOPIC HAND-SEWN ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS IN 2-STAGE TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY. REPORT OF 200 CONSECUTIVE CASES
587. ROLE OF THORACOSCOPIC HAND-SEWN ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS IN 2-STAGE TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY. REPORT OF 200 CONSECUTIVE CASES
Abstract
Esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been introduced in the ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
PURPOSE: In 1980, operative mortality for esophageal resection was 29%. Over the last 15 years, technical and critical care improvements contributed to the reduction of postoperati...
Robotic resection for esophageal cancer
Robotic resection for esophageal cancer
Summary
Background
In the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, complete tumor resection is the most important factor and determines long-term su...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...

