Javascript must be enabled to continue!
52-LB: Adult’s Lived Experience Using the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas
View through CrossRef
The Insulin-only Bionic Pancreas (BP) Pivotal Trial compared the BP initialized only with body weight vs. standard-of-care (SC) . The BP autonomously determines all insulin doses. Meals are announced without carbohydrate counting. For adults aged 19-75 the mean adjusted difference of HbA1c at 13 weeks between BP and SC was -0.5% (95% CI: -0.6, -0.3, P<0.001) ; percent of time <54 mg/dl was not different between groups. Focus groups were conducted among BP users at the trial’s end.
Adults reported improved time in range and A1c. Many reported it corrected highs well; others felt it took too long. Some experienced fewer lows; others reported more, stating the algorithm was too aggressive in correcting highs. Concerns were raised about the inability to prevent lows even when predicted. Many experienced improved glycemia at night, improved sleep and waking up in target range; some found night-time lows negatively impacted sleep. Many reported difficulties suspending insulin to prevent lows, leading to less exercise during the trial. Meal announcements were appreciated, with increased freedom to eat without guilt, but most wished for snack announcements. Some found challenges managing high-fat foods and not having an extended bolus.
Many reported decreased emotional, cognitive and management burden with less worry, guilt, and burnout due to increased TIR and no need to carbohydrate count. Some found increased burden due to increased lows, and increased time filling cartridges and changing infusion sites. Some trusted the BP immediately, felt it learned their body quickly, and appreciated the automation. Others found waiting for corrections intolerable, engaging in either over-treating lows or administering external insulin for highs. Not knowing insulin-on-board was difficult for some.
System-specific concerns included: cartridge capacity, short tubing, no clip, poor back-lighting, the screen timing out quickly, and not being waterproof. Gathering patient perspectives offers insights into learning and using the BP as well as the psychosocial impact of the BP which can be used to guide future innovations.
Disclosure
K. P. Garza: None. K. R. Howard: None. J. Weissberg-benchell: None. M. Feldman: None. Bionic pancreas group: n/a.
Funding
National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Disease (#1UC4DK108612-01)
American Diabetes Association
Title: 52-LB: Adult’s Lived Experience Using the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas
Description:
The Insulin-only Bionic Pancreas (BP) Pivotal Trial compared the BP initialized only with body weight vs.
standard-of-care (SC) .
The BP autonomously determines all insulin doses.
Meals are announced without carbohydrate counting.
For adults aged 19-75 the mean adjusted difference of HbA1c at 13 weeks between BP and SC was -0.
5% (95% CI: -0.
6, -0.
3, P<0.
001) ; percent of time <54 mg/dl was not different between groups.
Focus groups were conducted among BP users at the trial’s end.
Adults reported improved time in range and A1c.
Many reported it corrected highs well; others felt it took too long.
Some experienced fewer lows; others reported more, stating the algorithm was too aggressive in correcting highs.
Concerns were raised about the inability to prevent lows even when predicted.
Many experienced improved glycemia at night, improved sleep and waking up in target range; some found night-time lows negatively impacted sleep.
Many reported difficulties suspending insulin to prevent lows, leading to less exercise during the trial.
Meal announcements were appreciated, with increased freedom to eat without guilt, but most wished for snack announcements.
Some found challenges managing high-fat foods and not having an extended bolus.
Many reported decreased emotional, cognitive and management burden with less worry, guilt, and burnout due to increased TIR and no need to carbohydrate count.
Some found increased burden due to increased lows, and increased time filling cartridges and changing infusion sites.
Some trusted the BP immediately, felt it learned their body quickly, and appreciated the automation.
Others found waiting for corrections intolerable, engaging in either over-treating lows or administering external insulin for highs.
Not knowing insulin-on-board was difficult for some.
System-specific concerns included: cartridge capacity, short tubing, no clip, poor back-lighting, the screen timing out quickly, and not being waterproof.
Gathering patient perspectives offers insights into learning and using the BP as well as the psychosocial impact of the BP which can be used to guide future innovations.
Disclosure
K.
P.
Garza: None.
K.
R.
Howard: None.
J.
Weissberg-benchell: None.
M.
Feldman: None.
Bionic pancreas group: n/a.
Funding
National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Disease (#1UC4DK108612-01).
Related Results
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
During pregnancy, women may develop blood glucose abnormalities like gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or, rarely, type 1 diabetes (T1D), which can lead to ...
New and simple Ohmic definition of insulin resistance in lean and obese subjects
New and simple Ohmic definition of insulin resistance in lean and obese subjects
objective:: Insulin enhances the influx of glucose into cells. However, the relationship between glucose and insulin is complex and insulin sensitivity varies widely with age, ethn...
Insulin Lispro: Its Role in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
Insulin Lispro: Its Role in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
OBJECTIVE:
To introduce a rapid-acting human insulin analog, insulin lispro; to review its pharmacology, therapeutics, pharmacokinetics, dosing guidelines, adve...
Mutations in Insulin-Receptor Gene in Insulin-Resistant Patients
Mutations in Insulin-Receptor Gene in Insulin-Resistant Patients
Defects in insulin-receptor function have been associated with insulin-resistant states such as obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Several types of mutati...
Effect of intranasal insulin on osteocalcin levels and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing joint replacement
Effect of intranasal insulin on osteocalcin levels and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing joint replacement
Abstract
Background
Recently, intranasal insulin has shown great promise in preventing perioperative neurocognitive disorders t...
Experimental investigation on tip-vortex flow characteristics of novel bionic multi-tip winglet configurations
Experimental investigation on tip-vortex flow characteristics of novel bionic multi-tip winglet configurations
Five bionic multi-tip winglet configurations, inspired by basic feather shapes and wingtip postures of birds, were designed to suppress the tip-vortex structures around their wingt...
A Case of Insulin Resistance Secondary to Insulin Induced Localized Cutaneous Amyloidosis.
A Case of Insulin Resistance Secondary to Insulin Induced Localized Cutaneous Amyloidosis.
Abstract
Abstract 4908
Insulin resistance can be a major problem in patients with diabetes mellitus. Although multiple reasons can result in this prob...
Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes
Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes
AbstractThe sections in this article are:Insulin Secretion in T2DMFasting Insulin ConcentrationGlucose‐Stimulated Insulin SecretionOther Abnormalities in Insulin Secretion in T2DMM...

