Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Implications of Perhutani's CANOPY Brand Use for Nature Tourism After Trademark Registration Rejection by DGIP

View through CrossRef
Perum Perhutani has experienced an increase in tourism, necessitating standardization through the "Canopy" certification as a management guideline. This is regulated under the Decree of the President Director of Perhutani Number 2026/KPTS/DIR/2017 concerning the Standardization of Nature Tourism Management for Perum Perhutani, aimed at improving product and service quality, preserving forest sustainability, and benefiting the community. However, the "Canopy" service mark proposed by Perhutani was rejected by DJKI. The rejection was based on the similarity in pronunciation and type of goods with the registered mark "The Canopy." In fact, the two marks operate in different fields: "Canopy" for tourism services (class 39) and "The Canopy" for stationery (class 16). Thus, their products do not directly compete. The rejection of the "Canopy" mark is considered inconsistent with Article 21 of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The absence of legal action from Perhutani has resulted in the inability to use the mark, as it risks violating Article 100 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the same law. This research employs a juridical-empirical method with a qualitative approach through observation, interviews, documentation, and literature review. The findings indicate that Perhutani has complied with Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Minister of Tourism and Creative Economy Number 27 of 2014 concerning Recreational Park Business Standards through the "Canopy" certification. This has provided ecological, social, and economic benefits, as well as improved facilities and services. The rejection of the "Canopy" mark has caused financial losses at several tourist locations. Rebranding cannot proceed without a replacement name, causing the standardization program for nature tourism management to halt. The researcher recommends that Perhutani promptly create a replacement name for the certification so that the standardization program can continue and be applied to other Perhutani tourist destinations.
Title: Implications of Perhutani's CANOPY Brand Use for Nature Tourism After Trademark Registration Rejection by DGIP
Description:
Perum Perhutani has experienced an increase in tourism, necessitating standardization through the "Canopy" certification as a management guideline.
This is regulated under the Decree of the President Director of Perhutani Number 2026/KPTS/DIR/2017 concerning the Standardization of Nature Tourism Management for Perum Perhutani, aimed at improving product and service quality, preserving forest sustainability, and benefiting the community.
However, the "Canopy" service mark proposed by Perhutani was rejected by DJKI.
The rejection was based on the similarity in pronunciation and type of goods with the registered mark "The Canopy.
" In fact, the two marks operate in different fields: "Canopy" for tourism services (class 39) and "The Canopy" for stationery (class 16).
Thus, their products do not directly compete.
The rejection of the "Canopy" mark is considered inconsistent with Article 21 of Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications.
The absence of legal action from Perhutani has resulted in the inability to use the mark, as it risks violating Article 100 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the same law.
This research employs a juridical-empirical method with a qualitative approach through observation, interviews, documentation, and literature review.
The findings indicate that Perhutani has complied with Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Minister of Tourism and Creative Economy Number 27 of 2014 concerning Recreational Park Business Standards through the "Canopy" certification.
This has provided ecological, social, and economic benefits, as well as improved facilities and services.
The rejection of the "Canopy" mark has caused financial losses at several tourist locations.
Rebranding cannot proceed without a replacement name, causing the standardization program for nature tourism management to halt.
The researcher recommends that Perhutani promptly create a replacement name for the certification so that the standardization program can continue and be applied to other Perhutani tourist destinations.

Related Results

Approach to analyzing qualitative and quantitative characteristics of a companys brand
Approach to analyzing qualitative and quantitative characteristics of a companys brand
To identify first goods, and then services on the market, first in the USA, and later in other countries of the world, in the 20–30s of the last century, a trademark was introduced...
Air Qiaodan
Air Qiaodan
Purpose For this study, the Jordan case provided the context for investigating Chinese trademark law with the purpose of answering how and why Jordan lost the legal rights to the C...
Allure of the Abroad: Tiffany & Co., Its Cultural Influence, and Consumers
Allure of the Abroad: Tiffany & Co., Its Cultural Influence, and Consumers
Introduction Tiffany and Co. is an American luxury jewellery and specialty retailer with its headquarters in New York City. Each piece of jewellery, symbolically packaged in a blue...
Air mixing and sub-canopy advection in an oil palm plantation in Indonesia
Air mixing and sub-canopy advection in an oil palm plantation in Indonesia
<p>In tall vegetation canopies, such as forest or oil palm monoculture plantations, the below-canopy airflow can be influenced by the local topography and thereby cau...
PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK DAN GUGATAN ATAS PELANGGARAN MEREK
PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK DAN GUGATAN ATAS PELANGGARAN MEREK
Problems in registering a mark that is conceptually identical to another mark can be resolved by filing a trademark cancellation lawsuit. However, in drafting a lawsuit, the owner ...
FAKTOR PENENTU BRAND EQUITY DAN PENGARUHNYA PADA PURCHASE INTENTION
FAKTOR PENENTU BRAND EQUITY DAN PENGARUHNYA PADA PURCHASE INTENTION
Abstract- This study aims to determine the effect of brand popularity on brand loyalty, brand awareness, perceived quality and brand reputation among Etude House Indonesia users. O...
PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA
PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA
The right of a trademark is an exclusive right granted by government. A registered trademark can be cancelled from the General List of Trademark. Cancellation of registration of a ...
Seeking Alternative of Trademark Cancellation in Indonesia: From Trademark Law to Religious Ethical Corporative Theory
Seeking Alternative of Trademark Cancellation in Indonesia: From Trademark Law to Religious Ethical Corporative Theory
Background:  Trademark disputes in Indonesia often arise due to similarity in principle (persamaan pada pokoknya) and bad faith registration, as regulated under Law No. 20 of 2016 ...

Back to Top