Javascript must be enabled to continue!
N. N. Strakhov and Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin Speech”
View through CrossRef
The article considered three versions of N. N. Strakhov’s essay on the Pushkin Celebration of June 6–8, 1880 and Dostoevsky’s Speech delivered there. A comparative analysis of the texts published in 1880, 1883 and 1888 reveals the evolution of their author’s consciousness and fills in the existing gap in the history of his attitude to Dostoevsky, which has led to the infamous letter to Tolstoy dated November 28, 1883. According to Strakhov, the artistic flair manifested in Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin speech”, originates directly in God, whose mouthpiece the artist becomes aside from his own earthly personality, which does not only lack a connection with the meanings being transmitted, but may also directly contradict them. This is the ideological ground (combined with personal antipathy) on which the “aversion” to Dostoevsky ripens. As he revises his essay, Strakhov arrives increasingly closer to explaining the triumph of “Pushkin’s speech” solely as a victory of the “party,” and ultimately explains it by the insignificance of the event itself. The article draws a conclusion on the ambivalent nature of Strakhov’s thinking. One and the same phenomenon — in this case, Dostoevsky’s “conciliatory attitude” — is “exaggerated” by the critic alternately in a positive and in a negative sense. In regard to the significance of “Pushkin’s speech” in the history of Russian culture, Strakhov moves from unconditional approval to destructive doubt (from I. Aksakov to K. Leontiev).
Title: N. N. Strakhov and Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin Speech”
Description:
The article considered three versions of N.
N.
Strakhov’s essay on the Pushkin Celebration of June 6–8, 1880 and Dostoevsky’s Speech delivered there.
A comparative analysis of the texts published in 1880, 1883 and 1888 reveals the evolution of their author’s consciousness and fills in the existing gap in the history of his attitude to Dostoevsky, which has led to the infamous letter to Tolstoy dated November 28, 1883.
According to Strakhov, the artistic flair manifested in Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin speech”, originates directly in God, whose mouthpiece the artist becomes aside from his own earthly personality, which does not only lack a connection with the meanings being transmitted, but may also directly contradict them.
This is the ideological ground (combined with personal antipathy) on which the “aversion” to Dostoevsky ripens.
As he revises his essay, Strakhov arrives increasingly closer to explaining the triumph of “Pushkin’s speech” solely as a victory of the “party,” and ultimately explains it by the insignificance of the event itself.
The article draws a conclusion on the ambivalent nature of Strakhov’s thinking.
One and the same phenomenon — in this case, Dostoevsky’s “conciliatory attitude” — is “exaggerated” by the critic alternately in a positive and in a negative sense.
In regard to the significance of “Pushkin’s speech” in the history of Russian culture, Strakhov moves from unconditional approval to destructive doubt (from I.
Aksakov to K.
Leontiev).
Related Results
Did the Native Soil Movement Really Exist? (Polemical Notes)
Did the Native Soil Movement Really Exist? (Polemical Notes)
This article deals with ideological and aesthetic foundations of the 19th-century literary movement which was later called Pochvennichestvo (Native Soil). Some scholars have sugges...
“Pushkin é nosso tudo”? A.S. Pushkin como hipertexto nacional
“Pushkin é nosso tudo”? A.S. Pushkin como hipertexto nacional
O artigo trata do problema interdisciplinar da biografia criativa de A.S. Pushkin (vida e textos em sua gênese comum) como um hipertexto nacional russo. O artigo considera a possib...
Dostoevsky, the Writer’s Nephew
Dostoevsky, the Writer’s Nephew
Andrei Andreevich Dostoevsky, the youngest son of A. M. Dostoevsky, along with his father, widow, son and grandson of the writer, became one of the key figures in preserving the me...
Dostoevsky’s Pushkin Speech in the Testimonies of Contemporaries
Dostoevsky’s Pushkin Speech in the Testimonies of Contemporaries
The article provides a critical analysis of the sources that report the details of Dostoevsky's Pushkin speech on June 8, 1880. They include letters, diaries and memoirs of listene...
Dostoevsky as an Artist of the Godless World
Dostoevsky as an Artist of the Godless World
Article off ers an unconventional view of Dostoevsky as an artist of the godless world. The author separates Dostoevsky’s Christian worldview from the artistic image of the world h...
Pola Komunikasi Interpersonal Terapis Wicara pada Anak Telambat Bicara (Speech Delay)
Pola Komunikasi Interpersonal Terapis Wicara pada Anak Telambat Bicara (Speech Delay)
Abstract. The tittle of this study is Interpersonal Communication Patterns of Speech Therapists in Children with Speech Delay. Children with speech delay disorders are also social ...
Gra popędów. Freud o Dostojewskim
Gra popędów. Freud o Dostojewskim
The game of desires. Freud about DostoevskyThe feature S. Freud, the father of psychoanalyses, has in common with Dostoevsky is the fascination with the puzzle of human being they ...
Nikolai Nikolaevich Strakhov: The Birth of a Philosopher from the Spirit of Sincerity. Strakhov, Nikolai N., Introduction to Comprehensive Philosophy. Part One. The Science of the Soul as a Real Existing Subject (Student Lecture Notes, fragments), Publica
Nikolai Nikolaevich Strakhov: The Birth of a Philosopher from the Spirit of Sincerity. Strakhov, Nikolai N., Introduction to Comprehensive Philosophy. Part One. The Science of the Soul as a Real Existing Subject (Student Lecture Notes, fragments), Publica
Lecture course notes are one of the most important sources for clarifying the origins of the development of a philosopher and a scholar in the humanities. Studying such materials ...

