Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

N. N. Strakhov and Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin Speech”

View through CrossRef
The article considered three versions of N. N. Strakhov’s essay on the Pushkin Celebration of June 6–8, 1880 and Dostoevsky’s Speech delivered there. A comparative analysis of the texts published in 1880, 1883 and 1888 reveals the evolution of their author’s consciousness and fills in the existing gap in the history of his attitude to Dostoevsky, which has led to the infamous letter to Tolstoy dated November 28, 1883. According to Strakhov, the artistic flair manifested in Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin speech”, originates directly in God, whose mouthpiece the artist becomes aside from his own earthly personality, which does not only lack a connection with the meanings being transmitted, but may also directly contradict them. This is the ideological ground (combined with personal antipathy) on which the “aversion” to Dostoevsky ripens. As he revises his essay, Strakhov arrives increasingly closer to explaining the triumph of “Pushkin’s speech” solely as a victory of the “party,” and ultimately explains it by the insignificance of the event itself. The article draws a conclusion on the ambivalent nature of Strakhov’s thinking. One and the same phenomenon — in this case, Dostoevsky’s “conciliatory attitude” — is “exaggerated” by the critic alternately in a positive and in a negative sense. In regard to the significance of “Pushkin’s speech” in the history of Russian culture, Strakhov moves from unconditional approval to destructive doubt (from I. Aksakov to K. Leontiev).
Title: N. N. Strakhov and Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin Speech”
Description:
The article considered three versions of N.
N.
Strakhov’s essay on the Pushkin Celebration of June 6–8, 1880 and Dostoevsky’s Speech delivered there.
A comparative analysis of the texts published in 1880, 1883 and 1888 reveals the evolution of their author’s consciousness and fills in the existing gap in the history of his attitude to Dostoevsky, which has led to the infamous letter to Tolstoy dated November 28, 1883.
According to Strakhov, the artistic flair manifested in Dostoevsky’s “Pushkin speech”, originates directly in God, whose mouthpiece the artist becomes aside from his own earthly personality, which does not only lack a connection with the meanings being transmitted, but may also directly contradict them.
This is the ideological ground (combined with personal antipathy) on which the “aversion” to Dostoevsky ripens.
As he revises his essay, Strakhov arrives increasingly closer to explaining the triumph of “Pushkin’s speech” solely as a victory of the “party,” and ultimately explains it by the insignificance of the event itself.
The article draws a conclusion on the ambivalent nature of Strakhov’s thinking.
One and the same phenomenon — in this case, Dostoevsky’s “conciliatory attitude” — is “exaggerated” by the critic alternately in a positive and in a negative sense.
In regard to the significance of “Pushkin’s speech” in the history of Russian culture, Strakhov moves from unconditional approval to destructive doubt (from I.
Aksakov to K.
Leontiev).

Related Results

“Pushkin é nosso tudo”? A.S. Pushkin como hipertexto nacional
“Pushkin é nosso tudo”? A.S. Pushkin como hipertexto nacional
O artigo trata do problema interdisciplinar da biografia criativa de A.S. Pushkin (vida e textos em sua gênese comum) como um hipertexto nacional russo. O artigo considera a possib...
Dostoevsky, the Writer’s Nephew
Dostoevsky, the Writer’s Nephew
Andrei Andreevich Dostoevsky, the youngest son of A. M. Dostoevsky, along with his father, widow, son and grandson of the writer, became one of the key figures in preserving the me...
Dostoevsky’s Pushkin Speech in the Testimonies of Contemporaries
Dostoevsky’s Pushkin Speech in the Testimonies of Contemporaries
The article provides a critical analysis of the sources that report the details of Dostoevsky's Pushkin speech on June 8, 1880. They include letters, diaries and memoirs of listene...
Dostoevsky as an Artist of the Godless World
Dostoevsky as an Artist of the Godless World
Article off ers an unconventional view of Dostoevsky as an artist of the godless world. The author separates Dostoevsky’s Christian worldview from the artistic image of the world h...
Gra popędów. Freud o Dostojewskim
Gra popędów. Freud o Dostojewskim
The game of desires. Freud about DostoevskyThe feature S. Freud, the father of psychoanalyses, has in common with Dostoevsky is the fascination with the puzzle of human being they ...
Mikhail Lermontov as Alexander Pushkin’s Spiritual Successor
Mikhail Lermontov as Alexander Pushkin’s Spiritual Successor
This article considers the phenomenon of Alexander Pushkin to be a value vector for the develo­pment of Lermontov’s artistic and personal genius. Following an examination of remini...
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
In de oorlogsdagboeken van Joris Van Severen valt zijn belangstelling op voor bepaalde aspecten van de Russische cultuur, die weinig met elkaar gemeen hebben, met name Dostojevski ...
PUSHKIN AND CHINA
PUSHKIN AND CHINA
The literary heritage of Alexander Pushkin is well known to a wide range of readers. A line in a letter to Count A. Benckendorff, written in January 1830 and in which Pushkin asks ...

Back to Top