Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assessing the Impact of AI-Augmented DevSecOps on Lead Time in Agile Release Management

View through CrossRef
Background Despite increasing interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) within DevSecOps environments, empirical evidence quantifying its impact on software delivery performance remains limited, particularly in regulated enterprise contexts. Lead time for changes is a core DevSecOps performance indicator, yet controlled evaluations of AI-augmented pipelines remain scarce. This study investigates whether on-premises generative AI integration can measurably reduce release lead time while preserving governance and quality controls. Methods A quasi-experimental within-team design was conducted across two consecutive two-week Scrum sprints in an enterprise environment developing internal sales, human resource, and biometric absence systems. Sprint 1 served as the baseline using a conventional DevSecOps pipeline. Sprint 2 introduced an AI-augmented pipeline integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) within a GitLab–Docker CI/CD infrastructure. The primary outcome was lead time for changes. Secondary metrics included deployment frequency and change failure rate. Statistical analysis employed Welch’s t-test, effect size estimation (Cohen’s d), and confidence interval analysis. Results A total of 42 distinct changes (21 per sprint) were analyzed. Mean lead time decreased by 39.2% during the intervention sprint (Welch’s t(32.4) = 4.28, p = 0.00014), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.32) and a 95% confidence interval indicating a reduction of 15.8–37.4 hours. Security scanning time decreased by 64.6%, and approval latency decreased by 48.5%. Deployment frequency increased by 61.9%, while change failure rate declined from 14.3% to 8.7%. AI recommendation acceptance improved from 62.4% in Week 1 to 78.6% in Week 2 and was positively correlated with lead-time reduction (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Conclusions On-premises human-in-the-loop generative AI significantly reduced DevSecOps lead time without compromising reliability or governance. The findings challenge the traditional speed–security tradeoff by demonstrating that AI-assisted security validation and release evaluation can simultaneously enhance delivery efficiency and operational stability in regulated enterprise environments. This study examines the influence of on-premises generative AI augmentation on DevSecOps release lead time within agile software development settings. Despite increasing interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) within Development-Security-Operations (DevSecOps) environments, empirical evidence quantifying its impact on software delivery performance remains limited, particularly in regulated enterprise contexts. Lead time for changes is a core DevSecOps performance indicator, yet controlled evaluations of AI-augmented pipelines remain scarce. This study investigates whether on-premises generative AI integration can measurably reduce release lead time while preserving governance and quality controls. A quasi-experimental within-team design was conducted across two consecutive two-week Scrum sprints in an enterprise environment developing internal sales, human resource, and biometric absence systems. Sprint 1 served as the baseline using a conventional DevSecOps pipeline. Sprint 2 introduced an AI-augmented pipeline integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) within a GitLab–Docker CI/CD infrastructure. The primary outcome was lead time for changes. Secondary metrics included deployment frequency and change failure rate. Statistical analysis employed Welch’s t-test, effect size estimation (Cohen’s d), and confidence interval analysis. A total of 42 distinct changes (21 per sprint) were analyzed. Mean lead time decreased by 39.2% during the intervention sprint (Welch’s t(32.4) = 4.28, p = 0.00014), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.32) and a 95% confidence interval indicating a reduction of 15.8–37.4 hours. Security scanning time decreased by 64.6%, and approval latency decreased by 48.5%. Deployment frequency increased by 61.9%, while change failure rate declined from 14.3% to 8.7%. AI recommendation acceptance improved from 62.4% in Week 1 to 78.6% in Week 2 and was positively correlated with lead-time reduction (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). On-premises human-in-the-loop generative AI significantly reduced DevSecOps lead time without compromising reliability or governance. The findings challenge the traditional speed–security tradeoff by demonstrating that AI-assisted DevSecOps validation and release evaluation can simultaneously enhance delivery efficiency and operational stability in regulated enterprise environments.
Title: Assessing the Impact of AI-Augmented DevSecOps on Lead Time in Agile Release Management
Description:
Background Despite increasing interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) within DevSecOps environments, empirical evidence quantifying its impact on software delivery performance remains limited, particularly in regulated enterprise contexts.
Lead time for changes is a core DevSecOps performance indicator, yet controlled evaluations of AI-augmented pipelines remain scarce.
This study investigates whether on-premises generative AI integration can measurably reduce release lead time while preserving governance and quality controls.
Methods A quasi-experimental within-team design was conducted across two consecutive two-week Scrum sprints in an enterprise environment developing internal sales, human resource, and biometric absence systems.
Sprint 1 served as the baseline using a conventional DevSecOps pipeline.
Sprint 2 introduced an AI-augmented pipeline integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) within a GitLab–Docker CI/CD infrastructure.
The primary outcome was lead time for changes.
Secondary metrics included deployment frequency and change failure rate.
Statistical analysis employed Welch’s t-test, effect size estimation (Cohen’s d), and confidence interval analysis.
Results A total of 42 distinct changes (21 per sprint) were analyzed.
Mean lead time decreased by 39.
2% during the intervention sprint (Welch’s t(32.
4) = 4.
28, p = 0.
00014), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.
32) and a 95% confidence interval indicating a reduction of 15.
8–37.
4 hours.
Security scanning time decreased by 64.
6%, and approval latency decreased by 48.
5%.
Deployment frequency increased by 61.
9%, while change failure rate declined from 14.
3% to 8.
7%.
AI recommendation acceptance improved from 62.
4% in Week 1 to 78.
6% in Week 2 and was positively correlated with lead-time reduction (r = 0.
73, p < 0.
05).
Conclusions On-premises human-in-the-loop generative AI significantly reduced DevSecOps lead time without compromising reliability or governance.
The findings challenge the traditional speed–security tradeoff by demonstrating that AI-assisted security validation and release evaluation can simultaneously enhance delivery efficiency and operational stability in regulated enterprise environments.
This study examines the influence of on-premises generative AI augmentation on DevSecOps release lead time within agile software development settings.
Despite increasing interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) within Development-Security-Operations (DevSecOps) environments, empirical evidence quantifying its impact on software delivery performance remains limited, particularly in regulated enterprise contexts.
Lead time for changes is a core DevSecOps performance indicator, yet controlled evaluations of AI-augmented pipelines remain scarce.
This study investigates whether on-premises generative AI integration can measurably reduce release lead time while preserving governance and quality controls.
A quasi-experimental within-team design was conducted across two consecutive two-week Scrum sprints in an enterprise environment developing internal sales, human resource, and biometric absence systems.
Sprint 1 served as the baseline using a conventional DevSecOps pipeline.
Sprint 2 introduced an AI-augmented pipeline integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) within a GitLab–Docker CI/CD infrastructure.
The primary outcome was lead time for changes.
Secondary metrics included deployment frequency and change failure rate.
Statistical analysis employed Welch’s t-test, effect size estimation (Cohen’s d), and confidence interval analysis.
A total of 42 distinct changes (21 per sprint) were analyzed.
Mean lead time decreased by 39.
2% during the intervention sprint (Welch’s t(32.
4) = 4.
28, p = 0.
00014), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.
32) and a 95% confidence interval indicating a reduction of 15.
8–37.
4 hours.
Security scanning time decreased by 64.
6%, and approval latency decreased by 48.
5%.
Deployment frequency increased by 61.
9%, while change failure rate declined from 14.
3% to 8.
7%.
AI recommendation acceptance improved from 62.
4% in Week 1 to 78.
6% in Week 2 and was positively correlated with lead-time reduction (r = 0.
73, p < 0.
05).
On-premises human-in-the-loop generative AI significantly reduced DevSecOps lead time without compromising reliability or governance.
The findings challenge the traditional speed–security tradeoff by demonstrating that AI-assisted DevSecOps validation and release evaluation can simultaneously enhance delivery efficiency and operational stability in regulated enterprise environments.

Related Results

Framework for DevSecOps Implementation in Agile Environments
Framework for DevSecOps Implementation in Agile Environments
The integration of DevSecOps within Agile environments has emerged as a critical approach to enhancing software development efficiency, security, and reliability. This framework em...
CONCEPTUALIZING AGILE DEVELOPMENT IN DIGITAL TRANSFORMATIONS: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
CONCEPTUALIZING AGILE DEVELOPMENT IN DIGITAL TRANSFORMATIONS: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Agile development has emerged as a prominent approach in digital transformations due to its flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements. This review explores the theoreti...
THE ROLE OF AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN DRIVING INNOVATION IN ENERGY-EFFICIENT HVAC SOLUTIONS
THE ROLE OF AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN DRIVING INNOVATION IN ENERGY-EFFICIENT HVAC SOLUTIONS
This review delves into the significance of Agile Project Management (APM) in fostering innovation within the realm of energy-efficient Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (...
A REVIEW OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT: BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE FOR ENHANCED DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
A REVIEW OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT: BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE FOR ENHANCED DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
This study explores the intersection of agile methodologies and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), aiming to bridge theoretical insights with practical applications for an improve...
Relationship between Agile Maturity and Digital Transformation Success
Relationship between Agile Maturity and Digital Transformation Success
Digital transformation has become increasingly important for information technology software companies, as it can have a significant impact on the organization's bottom line. Howev...
The Impact of Agile Strategic Entrepreneurship Capabilities on Sustainable Innovation in Pakistan’s Textile Industry
The Impact of Agile Strategic Entrepreneurship Capabilities on Sustainable Innovation in Pakistan’s Textile Industry
Sustainable business performance (SBP) has emerged as a critical global objective over the past two decades, emphasizing the preservation of natural resources for future generation...
Agile methodologies in digital banking: Theoretical underpinnings and implications for customer satisfaction
Agile methodologies in digital banking: Theoretical underpinnings and implications for customer satisfaction
This paper delves into the theoretical underpinnings of agile methodologies and investigates their potential to enhance customer satisfaction in digital banking. Theoretical founda...
Acrobats and Safety Nets: Problematizing Large-Scale Agile Software Development
Acrobats and Safety Nets: Problematizing Large-Scale Agile Software Development
Agile development methods have become a standard in the software industry, including in large-scale projects. These methods share a set of underlying assumptions that distinguish t...

Back to Top