Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in China. Despite its willingness to adapt to the rules of the global market, China does not accept the direct applicability of international standards in administrative litigation. Judicial review of administration is based on a set of legislative texts and judicial interpretations by the Supreme People's Court. Among these texts, the Administrative Litigation Law regulates the judicial review of administrative acts. There are two lists in its chapter concerning the scope of judicial review: one includes the administrative acts that are open to judicial review, another the acts that are not reviewable. In any case, it is up to the courts to examine the following two combinations of criteria: the degree of the seriousness of the infringement with the definition of the state interest and that of the public interest; and the degree of procedural breach with the definition of the real impact on the rights of the plaintiff. According to Article 76 of the ALL, in the case of annulment and/or declaration of unlawfulness of an administrative act, a court may order the administration to take measures to compensate the damage inflicted on the plaintiff.
Title: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China
Description:
Abstract
This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in China.
Despite its willingness to adapt to the rules of the global market, China does not accept the direct applicability of international standards in administrative litigation.
Judicial review of administration is based on a set of legislative texts and judicial interpretations by the Supreme People's Court.
Among these texts, the Administrative Litigation Law regulates the judicial review of administrative acts.
There are two lists in its chapter concerning the scope of judicial review: one includes the administrative acts that are open to judicial review, another the acts that are not reviewable.
In any case, it is up to the courts to examine the following two combinations of criteria: the degree of the seriousness of the infringement with the definition of the state interest and that of the public interest; and the degree of procedural breach with the definition of the real impact on the rights of the plaintiff.
According to Article 76 of the ALL, in the case of annulment and/or declaration of unlawfulness of an administrative act, a court may order the administration to take measures to compensate the damage inflicted on the plaintiff.
Related Results
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Abstract
This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America. Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in...
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Based on the analysis of contemporary scholarly approaches to defining the functional purpose of first-instance courts in ensuring judicial protection of citizens’ rights during pr...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
The relevance of the research topic lies in the significance of judicial constitutional review as a key institution that ensures stability and development of the constitutional ord...
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
Abstract
This chapter describes administrative procedure and judicial review in France. In French public law, no constitutional provision provides for judicial revie...
Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China
Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China
This collection of articles analyses the problems with judicial review of trade remedy determinations in ten user countries - Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, ...
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
In the list of types of liability traditionally distinguished in the legal system of Armenia, procedural, including criminal, liability was not included. The 1998 edition of
the RA...

