Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America. Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in many Latin American countries, like Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela, and has been the object of special laws regulating the jurisdiction. According to the Constitutions and to the laws regulating the contentious administrative jurisdiction in Latin America, all administrative provisions are subjected to judicial review as it is not possible for any administrative act to escape judicial control. Therefore, the principle applicable is the universal character of the judicial oversight of constitutionality and unlawfulness regarding regulations and administrative acts, which is exercised by the Courts without exception. In almost all Latin American countries, the rules of administrative procedure are regulated through special Administrative Procedure Lasw (APLs), which began to be sanctioned in 1972 (Argentina). In all cases where the courts find that a challenged administrative act infringes the fundamental rights of an individual or corporation, or does not meet the fundamental standards of administrative propriety and fairness, the courts of the contentious administrative jurisdiction in all Latin American countries have the power not only to annul the challenged act but, depending on the nature of the claim filed by the plaintiff, the courts can also award damages for the administrative action.
Title: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Description:
Abstract
This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America.
Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in many Latin American countries, like Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela, and has been the object of special laws regulating the jurisdiction.
According to the Constitutions and to the laws regulating the contentious administrative jurisdiction in Latin America, all administrative provisions are subjected to judicial review as it is not possible for any administrative act to escape judicial control.
Therefore, the principle applicable is the universal character of the judicial oversight of constitutionality and unlawfulness regarding regulations and administrative acts, which is exercised by the Courts without exception.
In almost all Latin American countries, the rules of administrative procedure are regulated through special Administrative Procedure Lasw (APLs), which began to be sanctioned in 1972 (Argentina).
In all cases where the courts find that a challenged administrative act infringes the fundamental rights of an individual or corporation, or does not meet the fundamental standards of administrative propriety and fairness, the courts of the contentious administrative jurisdiction in all Latin American countries have the power not only to annul the challenged act but, depending on the nature of the claim filed by the plaintiff, the courts can also award damages for the administrative action.
Related Results
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Increased life expectancy of heart failure patients in a rural center by a multidisciplinary program
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
INTRODUCTION Patients with heart failure (HF)...
Primary PCI: a reasonable treatment for STEMI care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Primary PCI: a reasonable treatment for STEMI care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction
...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes
Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes
The topicality of the topic is due to the study of various forms and procedures of pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes as alternatives to the judicial procedure f...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
Legal Identificatino of Administrtive Procedure
Legal Identificatino of Administrtive Procedure
Creation of the new court jurisdiction in Ukraine represented by administrative procedure gave rise to the relevant areas of scientific research, many of which are concerned with i...
Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Europe and Latin America
Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Europe and Latin America
Abstract
This chapter provides a comparison of the discipline of judicial review of administrative action in Latin America and in Europe. In terms of judicial review...
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Priorities of Judicial Review of Complaints as a Component of the Judicial Protection Mechanism for Citizens’ Rights in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings
Based on the analysis of contemporary scholarly approaches to defining the functional purpose of first-instance courts in ensuring judicial protection of citizens’ rights during pr...

