Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China: implications for the WTO and international trade law
View through CrossRef
Purpose
The increased integration of national economies and the belief that international trade is beneficial to societies has led to the formation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), to regulate the conduct of international trade by national governments. Using US domestic legislation and case laws, as well as the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the legality or otherwise of the recent imposition of unilateral trade tariffs by the USA on China.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper adopts a doctrinal approach through a critical review of extant legislation and case laws. Drawing from existing literature in the area of WTO and international trade law, the paper argues that the imposition of tariffs by the Trump administration is outside the scope provided for by the WTO rules.
Findings
The paper finds that the imposition of unilateral tariffs by the Trump Government, while in breach of US domestic legislation and case laws, as well as the country’s obligations under the GATT 1994, portends a clear danger to the continued existence of the WTO and to international trade in general.
Originality/value
This paper is an original study of the author, which extends the body of knowledge in the area of international trade law, by analyzing the possible implications of the imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China and offering suggestions on how the impasse can be resolved.
Title: Imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China: implications for the WTO and international trade law
Description:
Purpose
The increased integration of national economies and the belief that international trade is beneficial to societies has led to the formation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), to regulate the conduct of international trade by national governments.
Using US domestic legislation and case laws, as well as the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, the purpose of this paper is to analyze the legality or otherwise of the recent imposition of unilateral trade tariffs by the USA on China.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper adopts a doctrinal approach through a critical review of extant legislation and case laws.
Drawing from existing literature in the area of WTO and international trade law, the paper argues that the imposition of tariffs by the Trump administration is outside the scope provided for by the WTO rules.
Findings
The paper finds that the imposition of unilateral tariffs by the Trump Government, while in breach of US domestic legislation and case laws, as well as the country’s obligations under the GATT 1994, portends a clear danger to the continued existence of the WTO and to international trade in general.
Originality/value
This paper is an original study of the author, which extends the body of knowledge in the area of international trade law, by analyzing the possible implications of the imposition of trade tariffs by the USA on China and offering suggestions on how the impasse can be resolved.
Related Results
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
High tariff rates have increased the overall cost of production in Pakistan, and the domestic prices of many products have become much higher than the international market prices. ...
Assessing the economic impact of tariffs: adaptations by multinationals and traders to mitigate tariffs
Assessing the economic impact of tariffs: adaptations by multinationals and traders to mitigate tariffs
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is (1) to inform academics and company strategists about the utility or dangers of tariffs and (2) to examine possible strategic adaptations by mu...
China and World Trade Organization Law
China and World Trade Organization Law
China had a complex engagement with the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) which reflected both its drastic political changes thro...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
Background. The most of the world’s trade relations are governed by uniform rules that form the legal basis of the WTO. Member states sometimes have different understanding of the ...
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Aktuelle Probleme der WTO
Nach Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges unterzeichnen knapp zwei Dutzend Staaten das von den USA vorgeschlagene «Allgemeine Zoll- und Handelsabkommen» (GATT). Die damalige Neuordnung des...
International Construction Law
International Construction Law
International law is a body of legally binding norms that regulate relations between the subjects of the international legal system and structure the functioning of the internation...
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
Using res judicata to resolve jurisdictional conflicts between WTO and regional trade agreements’ dispute settlement mechanisms
The WTO has a renowned dispute settlement body, distinguished from other dispute settlement bodies by its compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction. However, regional trade agreements ...

