Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture for SL2(????3)-extensions

View through CrossRef
In a previous work, we stated a conjecture, called the Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture, that generalizes the (abelian) Brumer–Stark conjecture to Galois extensions. We also proved that, in several cases, the Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture holds or reduces to the abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture. The first open case is the case of extensions with Galois group isomorphic to [Formula: see text]. This is the case studied in this paper. These extensions split naturally into two different types. For the first type, we prove the conjecture outside of [Formula: see text]. We also prove the conjecture for [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]-extensions of [Formula: see text] using computations. The version of the conjecture that we study is a stronger version, called the Refined Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture, that we introduce in the first part of the paper.
Title: The Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture for SL2(????3)-extensions
Description:
In a previous work, we stated a conjecture, called the Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture, that generalizes the (abelian) Brumer–Stark conjecture to Galois extensions.
We also proved that, in several cases, the Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture holds or reduces to the abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture.
The first open case is the case of extensions with Galois group isomorphic to [Formula: see text].
This is the case studied in this paper.
These extensions split naturally into two different types.
For the first type, we prove the conjecture outside of [Formula: see text].
We also prove the conjecture for [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]-extensions of [Formula: see text] using computations.
The version of the conjecture that we study is a stronger version, called the Refined Galois Brumer–Stark conjecture, that we introduce in the first part of the paper.

Related Results

A note on Khovanov–Rozansky sl2-homology and ordinary Khovanov homology
A note on Khovanov–Rozansky sl2-homology and ordinary Khovanov homology
In this paper we present an explicit isomorphism between Khovanov–Rozansky sl2-homology and ordinary Khovanov homology. This result was originally claimed in Khovanov and Rozansky'...
Harish-Chandra Modules over Hopf Galois Orders
Harish-Chandra Modules over Hopf Galois Orders
AbstractThe theory of Galois orders was introduced by Futorny and Ovsienko [9]. We introduce the notion of $\mathcal {H}$-Galois $\Lambda $-orders. These are certain noncommutative...
Arithmetic properties of non-hyperelliptic genus 3 curves
Arithmetic properties of non-hyperelliptic genus 3 curves
This thesis explores the explicit computation of twists of curves. We develope an algorithm for computing the twists of a given curve assuming that its automorphism group is known....
The Complexity of Mathematics
The Complexity of Mathematics
The strong Goldbach's conjecture states that every even integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes. The conjecture that all odd numbers greater than 7 are the s...
On aspherical presentations of groups
On aspherical presentations of groups
The Whitehead asphericity conjecture claims that if ⟨ A ‖ R ⟩ \langle \...
Critical Exponents, Colines, and Projective Geometries
Critical Exponents, Colines, and Projective Geometries
In [9, p. 469], Oxley made the following conjecture, which is a geometric analogue of a conjecture of Lovász (see [1, p. 290]) about complete graphs.Conjecture 1.1.Let G be a rank...
C*-algebraic Bieberbach, Robertson, Lebedev-Milin, Zalcman, Krzyz and Corona Conjectures
C*-algebraic Bieberbach, Robertson, Lebedev-Milin, Zalcman, Krzyz and Corona Conjectures
We study C*-algebraic versions of following conjectures/theorems: (1) Bieberbach conjecture (de Branges theorem) (2) Robertson conjecture (3) Lebedev-Milin conjecture (4) Zalcman c...
DICKSON CONJECTURE PROOF
DICKSON CONJECTURE PROOF
In 1904, Dickson [6] stated a very important conjecture. Now people call it Dickson’s conjecture. In 1958, Schinzel and Sierpinski [3]generalized Dickson’s conjecture to the higher...

Back to Top