Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Stark law, from inception to COVID-19 blanket waivers: a review
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe concept of physicians referring patients to their own healthcare entities is considered a “self-referral”. A discerning factor of a self-referral is when the physician has a financial interest in the entity of patient referral. Prospects of healthcare overutilization and costs, thereby, rise. Self-referral laws, therefore, are important to regulate overutilization and contain costs. In the 1980s, Congressman Fortney Stark initiated an act that was one of the precursors to one such self-referral law, known as the Stark Law. The Stark Law, in its initial phase, known as Stark I, addressed self-referrals selectively from laboratory services. Stark I, thereafter, in a series of subsequent amendments and enactments, burgeoned to include multiple services, referred as Designated Health Services (DHS), for self-referrals. The expanded law, inclusive of those DHS, is now known as Stark II. The passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act as well as the prevailing 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic further modified the Stark Law. Given the legislative history of the said law, the present review curates the legal initiatives of this law from its nascent formative stages to the present form. The purpose of the above curation is to present a bird’s eye view of its evolution and present analysts of any future research segments. This review, furthermore, describes the waivers of this law specific to COVID-19, or COVID-19 blanket waivers, which are instruments to assuage any barriers and further placate any hurdles arising from this law prevalent in this pandemic.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: The Stark law, from inception to COVID-19 blanket waivers: a review
Description:
AbstractThe concept of physicians referring patients to their own healthcare entities is considered a “self-referral”.
A discerning factor of a self-referral is when the physician has a financial interest in the entity of patient referral.
Prospects of healthcare overutilization and costs, thereby, rise.
Self-referral laws, therefore, are important to regulate overutilization and contain costs.
In the 1980s, Congressman Fortney Stark initiated an act that was one of the precursors to one such self-referral law, known as the Stark Law.
The Stark Law, in its initial phase, known as Stark I, addressed self-referrals selectively from laboratory services.
Stark I, thereafter, in a series of subsequent amendments and enactments, burgeoned to include multiple services, referred as Designated Health Services (DHS), for self-referrals.
The expanded law, inclusive of those DHS, is now known as Stark II.
The passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act as well as the prevailing 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic further modified the Stark Law.
Given the legislative history of the said law, the present review curates the legal initiatives of this law from its nascent formative stages to the present form.
The purpose of the above curation is to present a bird’s eye view of its evolution and present analysts of any future research segments.
This review, furthermore, describes the waivers of this law specific to COVID-19, or COVID-19 blanket waivers, which are instruments to assuage any barriers and further placate any hurdles arising from this law prevalent in this pandemic.
Related Results
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
ABSTRACT
The Covid-19 pandemic has changed economic conditions in various countries, including Indonesia. One of the sectors affected is the capital market sector which can also de...
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
Latar Belakang: kasus positif Covid-19 di Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2021 mencapai 12.350 dan terus mengalami penambahan jumlah. Dari jumlah tersebut terdapat 168 kasus positif Covi...
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
If one puts forward a question what medical law is all about, the common answer will be medical mishaps as result of clinical negligence leading to lawsuit and/or inquires of disci...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

