Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Connoisseurial Contradictions: Expertise modulates faultless disagreement
View through CrossRef
We report the results of an experiment investigating faultless disagreement by manipulating the relative expertise of the interlocutors. Our findings show that expertise differences affect judgments of faultless disagreement. We discuss ramifi- cations for prior accounts, and propose a novel account of faultless disagreement in a relativist framework making reference to standards of taste.
Title: Connoisseurial Contradictions: Expertise modulates faultless disagreement
Description:
We report the results of an experiment investigating faultless disagreement by manipulating the relative expertise of the interlocutors.
Our findings show that expertise differences affect judgments of faultless disagreement.
We discuss ramifi- cations for prior accounts, and propose a novel account of faultless disagreement in a relativist framework making reference to standards of taste.
Related Results
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When two people disagree about matters of taste, neither of them is in the wrong: There is nothing contradictory in an exchange where one person says 'The rollercoaster was fun!' a...
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the interaction between parties who hold diverging opinions about a given subject matter. The central...
Organizing the Net-Wide Public Expert Evaluation Based on Collective Intelligence Technologies
Organizing the Net-Wide Public Expert Evaluation Based on Collective Intelligence Technologies
Public expertise is now becoming an important element of public administration within the concept of open government, allowing to develop strategic plans and programs for the state...
Faultless or Disagreement
Faultless or Disagreement
AbstractAmong the various motivations that may lead to the idea that truth is relative in some non-conventional sense, one is that the idea helps explain how there can be ‘faultles...
Faultless Moral Disagreement
Faultless Moral Disagreement
AbstractFaultless disagreements are disagreements between two people, neither of whom has made a mistake or is at fault. It has been argued that there are faultless moral disagreem...
Faultless Disagreement
Faultless Disagreement
People disagree frequently, about both objective and subjective matters. But while at least one party must be wrong in a disagreement about objective matters, it seems that both pa...
Alethic Pluralism, Deflationism, and Faultless Disagreement
Alethic Pluralism, Deflationism, and Faultless Disagreement
AbstractThe chapter returns to the “folk”-anti-realist idea about certain areas of my thought and discourse—basic taste, for instance, or comedy—that their lack of objectivity crys...
Disagreement and Liquidity
Disagreement and Liquidity
Disagreement is an increasingly popular explanation for trade of informationally sensitive securities. Yet, there is limited research on the relation between disagreement and liqui...


