Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Metatheories of disagreement: Introduction

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis article introducesMetaphilosophy'sspecial issue on metatheories of disagreement, with the aim of promoting discussion on the nature of disagreement on a metatheoretical level. The contributions to this issue cover the following key topics related to disagreement: faultless disagreement, metaontological disagreement, metalinguistic disagreement, responses to peer disagreement in philosophy, hinge epistemology and deep disagreement, disagreement asymmetry, factual and nonfactual disagreement, and defining disagreement or verbal dispute. This introduction also provides general background on four major topics in order to contextualize the contributions to the special issue: first, the problem of characterizing the subject matter of disagreements; second, the most prominent accounts of deep disagreement, disagreement asymmetry and hinges; third, the notion of faultless disagreement; and finally, the problem of offering different approaches on what disagreements are.
Title: Metatheories of disagreement: Introduction
Description:
AbstractThis article introducesMetaphilosophy'sspecial issue on metatheories of disagreement, with the aim of promoting discussion on the nature of disagreement on a metatheoretical level.
The contributions to this issue cover the following key topics related to disagreement: faultless disagreement, metaontological disagreement, metalinguistic disagreement, responses to peer disagreement in philosophy, hinge epistemology and deep disagreement, disagreement asymmetry, factual and nonfactual disagreement, and defining disagreement or verbal dispute.
This introduction also provides general background on four major topics in order to contextualize the contributions to the special issue: first, the problem of characterizing the subject matter of disagreements; second, the most prominent accounts of deep disagreement, disagreement asymmetry and hinges; third, the notion of faultless disagreement; and finally, the problem of offering different approaches on what disagreements are.

Related Results

The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the interaction between parties who hold diverging opinions about a given subject matter. The central...
Disagreement and Disagreement - a Qur’anic Vision –
Disagreement and Disagreement - a Qur’anic Vision –
In this study, I dealt with the topic of (disagreement and difference - a Qur’anic vision). Difference is one of God’s laws regarding His creation, because God Almighty created hum...
Hinge-certainty and the asymmetricality of ‘deep moral disagreement’
Hinge-certainty and the asymmetricality of ‘deep moral disagreement’
Abstract The idea of deep disagreement, as a peculiarly distinct kind of disagreement, was seminally introduced by Fogelin. His diagnosis of the problems posed by deep di...
Disagreement Expressions as Speech Acts in Classroom Discussions: A Case for Iranian EFL Learners
Disagreement Expressions as Speech Acts in Classroom Discussions: A Case for Iranian EFL Learners
This research aimed to examine the use of linguistic markers and mitigation devices in expressing disagreement, as well as the influence of the power, rank, and severity of disagre...
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Abstract Background Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is the most prevalent subtype of thoracic outlet syndrome and remains one of the most controversial conditions in per...
Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment
Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment
Abstract The striking extent of religious disagreement suggests that religious conviction is very often the result of processes that do not reliably produce true bel...
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When two people disagree about matters of taste, neither of them is in the wrong: There is nothing contradictory in an exchange where one person says 'The rollercoaster was fun!' a...
Disagreement and Liquidity
Disagreement and Liquidity
Disagreement is an increasingly popular explanation for trade of informationally sensitive securities. Yet, there is limited research on the relation between disagreement and liqui...

Back to Top