Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Jurisprudential issues based on interpretative disagreement in determining the reference of a (Al-lafz) term from what came before it, an applied jurisprudence study
View through CrossRef
This research revolves around the applied jurisprudence studies that trace the effects of differing views and the diversity of intakes. Desiring to contribute to the industry of the jurist who has the ability to analyze the text with his tools that enable him to confront every new issues and not stand - helpless, since jurisprudence is not only a collection of issues, but rather it is a talent that must be acquired through training by induction, consideration and application on the legal texts and their treatment and deduction of rulings from them in a manner that is hoped to be approached in this research. Therefore, this research will address - by inductive collection and analysis - some manifestations of the doctrinal disagreement stemming from the explanatory disagreement of the text, and it included an introduction, a preface, four sections and a conclusion, according to the following: The introduction consists of the definition of the subject, its importance, and plan. And the preface with an explanation of the title and a statement of the impact of the nature of language on the doctrinal disagreement. The first topic is in the different jurisprudential issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al-lafz) the term in (Al-ibadat) worshiping, I present in it the collection and jurisprudence study of the applications falling under the chapters of worship, which differed in their ruling according to the difference in defining the meaning and arising from the reluctance to specify its reference from what came before it.The second topic is in the disagreed jurisprudential issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al-lafz) the term in (Al-muamalaat) transactions, in it I exposed the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of transactions, which differed in its ruling according to the difference in determining the meaning and arising from the hesitation in specifying its reference from what preceded it.And the third topic is in the disagreed jurisprudence issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al- lafz) the term in the rulings of family, in it I exposed to the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of family jurisprudence, which differed in its ruling according to the disagreeing in defining the meaning and arising from the reluctance to specify its reference from what came before it.The fourth topic deals with various doctrinal issues, according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference to (Al-lafz) the term in criminal and judicial matters, in it I exposed to the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of felonies and the judiciary, which differed in its ruling according to the disagreeing in the interpretation of the reference to the word in crimes and the judiciary. Then the research was concluded with the most important findings, and then proved a list of the research sources and references.
Title: Jurisprudential issues based on interpretative disagreement in determining the reference of a (Al-lafz) term from what came before it, an applied jurisprudence study
Description:
This research revolves around the applied jurisprudence studies that trace the effects of differing views and the diversity of intakes.
Desiring to contribute to the industry of the jurist who has the ability to analyze the text with his tools that enable him to confront every new issues and not stand - helpless, since jurisprudence is not only a collection of issues, but rather it is a talent that must be acquired through training by induction, consideration and application on the legal texts and their treatment and deduction of rulings from them in a manner that is hoped to be approached in this research.
Therefore, this research will address - by inductive collection and analysis - some manifestations of the doctrinal disagreement stemming from the explanatory disagreement of the text, and it included an introduction, a preface, four sections and a conclusion, according to the following: The introduction consists of the definition of the subject, its importance, and plan.
And the preface with an explanation of the title and a statement of the impact of the nature of language on the doctrinal disagreement.
The first topic is in the different jurisprudential issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al-lafz) the term in (Al-ibadat) worshiping, I present in it the collection and jurisprudence study of the applications falling under the chapters of worship, which differed in their ruling according to the difference in defining the meaning and arising from the reluctance to specify its reference from what came before it.
The second topic is in the disagreed jurisprudential issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al-lafz) the term in (Al-muamalaat) transactions, in it I exposed the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of transactions, which differed in its ruling according to the difference in determining the meaning and arising from the hesitation in specifying its reference from what preceded it.
And the third topic is in the disagreed jurisprudence issues in which according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference of the (Al- lafz) the term in the rulings of family, in it I exposed to the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of family jurisprudence, which differed in its ruling according to the disagreeing in defining the meaning and arising from the reluctance to specify its reference from what came before it.
The fourth topic deals with various doctrinal issues, according to the explanatory disagreement of the reference to (Al-lafz) the term in criminal and judicial matters, in it I exposed to the collection and the jurisprudential study of the applications falling under the chapters of felonies and the judiciary, which differed in its ruling according to the disagreeing in the interpretation of the reference to the word in crimes and the judiciary.
Then the research was concluded with the most important findings, and then proved a list of the research sources and references.
Related Results
Treatise on Sociological Jurisprudence: Oriental and Occidental Perspective
Treatise on Sociological Jurisprudence: Oriental and Occidental Perspective
Jurisprudence is an ocean of legal philosophy or thought which depth can never be discovered. The formal categorization of jurisprudential ideas in forms of six schools of thought ...
Metatheories of disagreement: Introduction
Metatheories of disagreement: Introduction
AbstractThis article introducesMetaphilosophy'sspecial issue on metatheories of disagreement, with the aim of promoting discussion on the nature of disagreement on a metatheoretica...
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the interaction between parties who hold diverging opinions about a given subject matter. The central...
The Existence of African Jurisprudence: An Audit of Life Experience of Precolonial Anlo Traditional Society
The Existence of African Jurisprudence: An Audit of Life Experience of Precolonial Anlo Traditional Society
There is a controversy about the nonexistence of African Jurisprudence fueled by a jurisprudential school of thought known as the Skeptic school of thought on African Jurisprudence...
Ta’wîl Ibn al-Zubayr terhadap Mutashâbih al-Lafz dalam al-Qur’an
Ta’wîl Ibn al-Zubayr terhadap Mutashâbih al-Lafz dalam al-Qur’an
The word is strung into the verses of the Koran is a divine sentence a similar level of fluency and beauty of literature between one verse with other verses. Although the Koran use...
Is There a Theory of Radical Disagreement?
Is There a Theory of Radical Disagreement?
Is There a Theory of Radical Disagreement?
This article concerns linguistic intractability, the verbal aspect of those conflicts that so far cannot be settled or transfor...
Disagreement and Disagreement - a Qur’anic Vision –
Disagreement and Disagreement - a Qur’anic Vision –
In this study, I dealt with the topic of (disagreement and difference - a Qur’anic vision). Difference is one of God’s laws regarding His creation, because God Almighty created hum...
Hinge-certainty and the asymmetricality of ‘deep moral disagreement’
Hinge-certainty and the asymmetricality of ‘deep moral disagreement’
Abstract
The idea of deep disagreement, as a peculiarly distinct kind of disagreement, was seminally introduced by Fogelin. His diagnosis of the problems posed by deep di...

