Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Faultless Moral Disagreement
View through CrossRef
AbstractFaultless disagreements are disagreements between two people, neither of whom has made a mistake or is at fault. It has been argued that there are faultless moral disagreements, that they cannot be accommodated by moral realism, and that in order to account for them, a form of relativism must be accepted. I argue that moral realism can accommodate faultless moral disagreement, provided that the phenomena is understood epistemically, and I give a brief defence of the relevant moral epistemology.
Title: Faultless Moral Disagreement
Description:
AbstractFaultless disagreements are disagreements between two people, neither of whom has made a mistake or is at fault.
It has been argued that there are faultless moral disagreements, that they cannot be accommodated by moral realism, and that in order to account for them, a form of relativism must be accepted.
I argue that moral realism can accommodate faultless moral disagreement, provided that the phenomena is understood epistemically, and I give a brief defence of the relevant moral epistemology.
Related Results
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives
When two people disagree about matters of taste, neither of them is in the wrong: There is nothing contradictory in an exchange where one person says 'The rollercoaster was fun!' a...
Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash
The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Moral epistemology
Moral epistemology
Epistemology is the study of knowledge and justified belief. So moral epistemology is the study of what would be involved in knowing, or being justified in believing, moral proposi...
Connoisseurial Contradictions: Expertise modulates faultless disagreement
Connoisseurial Contradictions: Expertise modulates faultless disagreement
We report the results of an experiment investigating faultless disagreement by manipulating the relative expertise of the interlocutors. Our findings show that expertise difference...
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement
The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the interaction between parties who hold diverging opinions about a given subject matter. The central...
NILAI MORAL DALAM NOVEL ORANG-ORANG BIASA KARYA ANDREA HIRATA
NILAI MORAL DALAM NOVEL ORANG-ORANG BIASA KARYA ANDREA HIRATA
Abstrak Kata Kunci: Nilai Moral Baik dan Buruk, NovelOrang-Orang Biasa. Nilai-nilai Moral adalah ajaran baik atau buruk perbuatan atau kelakuan, akhlak, kewajiban, budi pekerti...
Moral Realism and Faultless Disagreement
Moral Realism and Faultless Disagreement
AbstractIs moral realism compatible with the existence of moral disagreements? Since moral realism requires that if two persons are in disagreement over some moral question (that h...