Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ethnography in Antiquity

View through CrossRef
Today “ethnography” refers to three things simultaneously: it is a term for a body of scientific knowledge; a method for acquiring it; and a mode of representing it. Historically, however, we can disentangle those meanings. The first is only modern; the second can bear traces of Antiquity; the third is organically ancient. Scholarly use of the label is modern (in German, 1767; in Russian, 1802; in French, 1823; in English, 1834), as are the institutions and discourses where it came to refer to a body of scientific knowledge. In this sense, there is no ethnography before the Enlightenment sciences (or proto- and pseudo- forms) which coined it. Ethnography as a method is no less defined by the various fields where it is used. Yet ethnography is also used in humanistic fields (history; geography; law; theology; the arts) with deeper roots in Antiquity. In those fields, ethnography assimilates ancient sources and, occasionally, ancient ways of thinking. The humanities also hybridize with modern sciences to form new fields (e.g., Mediterranean Studies). This is another vector along which ethnographic methods transact with Antiquity. Finally, even modern sciences are eclectic in their methods, as when anthropologists adapt ancient theological categories to organize their fieldwork. In sum, prominent definitions of the ethnographic method (e.g., “participant observation”) are modern. Yet in practice, ethnography has been, and still is, not infrequently guided by ancient problems and perspectives. Finally, as a mode of representation, we do find ethnography in ancient authors, defined here by two basic shared interests. First: how and why human groups differ, in their inner and outer qualities, often using the author’s own group as a basis for comparison. Second, in order to analyze such differences, these ancient writers develop what we call ethnology: theories of peoplehood, including categories and hierarchies for classifying peoples. Ancient ethnography and ethnology are thus sites for the formation of concepts that, in complex ways, overlap with modern concepts like race; ethnicity; gender; nation; civilization; religion; and culture. Ancient ethnography often takes the form of apparent digressions in other Genres such as history, where writers survey a people’s customs, physical characteristics, habitat, virtues and vices, grafting their sources and observations onto literary models. These representations of self and other in Antiquity left a rich legacy, extending into the medieval and early modern eras. Approaches have been developed for comparing them to later ethnography—not only in terms of direct influence, but also in light of analogous literary and conceptual patterns.
Oxford University Press
Title: Ethnography in Antiquity
Description:
Today “ethnography” refers to three things simultaneously: it is a term for a body of scientific knowledge; a method for acquiring it; and a mode of representing it.
Historically, however, we can disentangle those meanings.
The first is only modern; the second can bear traces of Antiquity; the third is organically ancient.
Scholarly use of the label is modern (in German, 1767; in Russian, 1802; in French, 1823; in English, 1834), as are the institutions and discourses where it came to refer to a body of scientific knowledge.
In this sense, there is no ethnography before the Enlightenment sciences (or proto- and pseudo- forms) which coined it.
Ethnography as a method is no less defined by the various fields where it is used.
Yet ethnography is also used in humanistic fields (history; geography; law; theology; the arts) with deeper roots in Antiquity.
In those fields, ethnography assimilates ancient sources and, occasionally, ancient ways of thinking.
The humanities also hybridize with modern sciences to form new fields (e.
g.
, Mediterranean Studies).
This is another vector along which ethnographic methods transact with Antiquity.
Finally, even modern sciences are eclectic in their methods, as when anthropologists adapt ancient theological categories to organize their fieldwork.
In sum, prominent definitions of the ethnographic method (e.
g.
, “participant observation”) are modern.
Yet in practice, ethnography has been, and still is, not infrequently guided by ancient problems and perspectives.
Finally, as a mode of representation, we do find ethnography in ancient authors, defined here by two basic shared interests.
First: how and why human groups differ, in their inner and outer qualities, often using the author’s own group as a basis for comparison.
Second, in order to analyze such differences, these ancient writers develop what we call ethnology: theories of peoplehood, including categories and hierarchies for classifying peoples.
Ancient ethnography and ethnology are thus sites for the formation of concepts that, in complex ways, overlap with modern concepts like race; ethnicity; gender; nation; civilization; religion; and culture.
Ancient ethnography often takes the form of apparent digressions in other Genres such as history, where writers survey a people’s customs, physical characteristics, habitat, virtues and vices, grafting their sources and observations onto literary models.
These representations of self and other in Antiquity left a rich legacy, extending into the medieval and early modern eras.
Approaches have been developed for comparing them to later ethnography—not only in terms of direct influence, but also in light of analogous literary and conceptual patterns.

Related Results

Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
We are our own subjects. How our subjectivity becomes entangled in the lives of others is and has always been our topic. (Denzin 27)This article reflects on the process of disclosi...
Online ethnography: a study of software developers and software development
Online ethnography: a study of software developers and software development
Purpose– Qualitative research has made important contributions to social science by enabling researchers to engage with people and get an in-depth understanding of their views, bel...
The Legacy of Antiquity in Educational and Cultural Practices of Orthodox Colleges of Ukraine in the 18th century
The Legacy of Antiquity in Educational and Cultural Practices of Orthodox Colleges of Ukraine in the 18th century
The purpose of the paper is to characterize the Chernihiv, Kharkiv and Pereiaslav collegiums as cultural mediators in the process of bringing the society of Hetmanate and Sloboda U...
Critical ethnography: opportunities for social work research
Critical ethnography: opportunities for social work research
Social work research is conducted using various approaches and methods. This article aims to characterize critical ethnography and its opportunities for critical social work aimed ...
From the ethnographic turn to new forms of organizational ethnography
From the ethnographic turn to new forms of organizational ethnography
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to outline the context and the content of the six papers that follow in this special issue on “New Forms of Organizational Ethnography”.Design...
Institutional ethnography
Institutional ethnography
The term “institutional ethnography” has been used since 1987 to refer to an approach to social inquiry pioneered by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith (Campbell & DeVault 2...
Kebijakan Publik Melalui Lensa Etnografi: Menggali Dinamika Sosial Melalui Kerangka Tahapan Kebijakan Michael Howlett
Kebijakan Publik Melalui Lensa Etnografi: Menggali Dinamika Sosial Melalui Kerangka Tahapan Kebijakan Michael Howlett
This study explores social dynamics through an ethnographic approach through Michael Howlett's policy stage analysis framework. This study uses a qualitative method with a descript...

Back to Top