Greek and Roman Metaphysics

Metaphysics, in its broadest definition, is about what there is. Its domain is so vast that it is not possible to give an exhaustive but only a representative range of questions it engages with. These are questions about the nature of reality: what its ultimate constituents are; what populates the world in which we live; how the world changes and things interact causally within it; and much more. Metaphysics is as “old” as human thought about nature is. The word itself (even if Aristotle himself did not use it) derives from the title of one of Aristotle’s works. It was an editor (in all probability, Andronicus of Rhodes), at least one hundred years after Aristotle’s death, who titled one of his works “Ta meta ta physika,” meaning literally “the [books] after the physical ones,” where the “physical ones” are the collection of books that we now call Aristotle’s Physics. Like other sciences, metaphysics has aims and a methodology: in very broad terms, its goal is to advance our understanding of reality by analyzing problems and developing explanatory models for them, which are then “tested” against possible counterexamples that the proposed account might not be able to explain. While the domain of interest of metaphysics has continuously evolved since Aristotle’s time, there is continuity between ancient and contemporary metaphysics in subject matter and methodology. The reader interested in this entry might also want to browse the Oxford Bibliographies article in Philosophy “Contemporary Metaphysics.” Acknowledgments: thanks are due to Sophie Cartwright for the research assistance she provided for this work.