Javascript must be enabled to continue!
1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
15% of all hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, and greater than 90% of them are not truly allergic. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, increasing in-hospital mortality, and increasing hospital stays. Historically, penicillin allergies were delabeled by either allergists or infectious disease specialists. Pharmacy-led delabeling programs are emerging but are limited due to pharmacists not having provider status in all states. Also, after successful delabeling, a significant number of patients were relabeled for penicillin allergies on subsequent hospital visits.
Methods
We conducted an internal medicine resident-driven quality improvement project in a 350 bed community hospital. Fifty-six patients with a penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record (EMR) were randomly selected from the inpatient service. If the patient had a non-allergic reaction or had prior exposure to penicillin without a reaction, they were directly delabeled. The remainder underwent risk stratification using the PENFAST scoring tool. Very low-risk and low-risk patients underwent an oral challenge after obtaining written consent. Following this, a hospital-wide pharmacist-triggered physician-driven delabelling protocol was established.
Results
We assessed 56 patients between 04/2022 and 09/2022. Thirty-eight patients were delabeled: 18 by direct delabeling and 20 via oral penicillin challenge. One patient who underwent the oral challenge had an adverse reaction (nausea and vomiting). Seven months later, we conducted a secondary survey to assess the durability of our delabeling. Thirteen percent of patients (n=5) had the penicillin allergy label re-added to their chart on subsequent hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Delabeling patients on the inpatient service is effective, carries little risk, and requires minimal resources. Additionally, it does not require specialist services. However, the durability of delabeling needs to be reinforced with a robust hospital delabeling protocol, continuous patient education, and EMR alerts to prevent allergy labels from being added back on subsequent visits.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
Description:
Abstract
Background
15% of all hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, and greater than 90% of them are not truly allergic.
Penicillin allergy labels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, increasing in-hospital mortality, and increasing hospital stays.
Historically, penicillin allergies were delabeled by either allergists or infectious disease specialists.
Pharmacy-led delabeling programs are emerging but are limited due to pharmacists not having provider status in all states.
Also, after successful delabeling, a significant number of patients were relabeled for penicillin allergies on subsequent hospital visits.
Methods
We conducted an internal medicine resident-driven quality improvement project in a 350 bed community hospital.
Fifty-six patients with a penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record (EMR) were randomly selected from the inpatient service.
If the patient had a non-allergic reaction or had prior exposure to penicillin without a reaction, they were directly delabeled.
The remainder underwent risk stratification using the PENFAST scoring tool.
Very low-risk and low-risk patients underwent an oral challenge after obtaining written consent.
Following this, a hospital-wide pharmacist-triggered physician-driven delabelling protocol was established.
Results
We assessed 56 patients between 04/2022 and 09/2022.
Thirty-eight patients were delabeled: 18 by direct delabeling and 20 via oral penicillin challenge.
One patient who underwent the oral challenge had an adverse reaction (nausea and vomiting).
Seven months later, we conducted a secondary survey to assess the durability of our delabeling.
Thirteen percent of patients (n=5) had the penicillin allergy label re-added to their chart on subsequent hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Delabeling patients on the inpatient service is effective, carries little risk, and requires minimal resources.
Additionally, it does not require specialist services.
However, the durability of delabeling needs to be reinforced with a robust hospital delabeling protocol, continuous patient education, and EMR alerts to prevent allergy labels from being added back on subsequent visits.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Related Results
Norwegian Anaesthesiologist's Perspectives on Perioperative Allergies and Penicillin Allergy Evaluations: A National Survey
Norwegian Anaesthesiologist's Perspectives on Perioperative Allergies and Penicillin Allergy Evaluations: A National Survey
ABSTRACT
Background
Penicillin allergy is a frequent challenge in perioperative antibiotic stewardship. Although 3%–10% o...
555. Early Outcomes of Penicillin and Cephalosporin Allergy Assessment Tool
555. Early Outcomes of Penicillin and Cephalosporin Allergy Assessment Tool
Abstract
Background
Penicillin allergy is reported in approximately 10% of the US population and is one of the most frequent med...
Influence of Reported Penicillin Allergy on Mortality in MSSA Bacteremia
Influence of Reported Penicillin Allergy on Mortality in MSSA Bacteremia
Abstract
Background
Penicillin allergy frequently impacts antibiotic choice. As beta-lactams are superior to vancomycin in treat...
Allergy-Like Asthma and Rhinitis
Allergy-Like Asthma and Rhinitis
<i>Background:</i> Chronic idiopathic urticaria is considered an allergy-like skin disorder, and in some cases an auto-reactivity caused by mast cell degranulating fact...
Identification of predictors for persistence of immediate-type egg allergy in Chinese children
Identification of predictors for persistence of immediate-type egg allergy in Chinese children
Background
Egg allergy is one of the most common food allergies in childhood with increasing prevalence in Hong Kong. While ample studies were published on its ...
Virtually supported penicillin allergy de-labelling during COVID-19
Virtually supported penicillin allergy de-labelling during COVID-19
Abstract
Background: Penicillin allergy is a commonly listed medication allergy despite rare overall incidence. Many patients erroneously have this label, which has persona...
Penicillin causes non-allergic anaphylaxis by activating the contact system
Penicillin causes non-allergic anaphylaxis by activating the contact system
AbstractImmediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR) can be divided into allergic- and non-allergic-mediated, while “anaphylaxis” is reserved for severe IHR. Clinically, true penicill...
Penicillin Allergy and Perioperative Anaphylaxis
Penicillin Allergy and Perioperative Anaphylaxis
Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy, while perioperative anaphylaxis is overall rare. This review covers the epidemiology of both penicillin allergy and p...

