Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

INNOVATIONS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT: ASSESSMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY'S IMPACT ON THE QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPORTS INDUSTRY

View through CrossRef
The rapid development of the digital economy has promoted industrial transformation and upgrading, brought changes to the production mode and personal consumption mode of enterprises, and the development of traditional industries are constantly being realised in a digital format. The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development. Methodology. In the index system weighting method is mainly divided into subjective empowerment and objective empowerment, in terms of subjective empowerment, it is based on the relative importance between the indicators by subjective judgment to give appropriate weight, such as principal component analysis, AHP; and objective empowerment is based on the original information to empower, such as cluster analysis, standard deviation, entropy and extreme method, and so forth. In the selection of measurement method, some scholars believe that the subjective weight method will be disturbed by human factors, which will bias the calculation results, and can not respond to authenticity. In view of this, this paper adopts the entropy method to measure the high-quality economic development level and digital economy development level in 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019. The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development. This paper constructs three subsystems and 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry. To explore the spatial spillover effect of digital economy development on the high-quality development of sports industry, the high-quality development of sports industry in China in 2011-2020 was taken as the explanatory variable, and the development of digital economy was taken as the explanatory variable. The purpose of the article is to build spatial measurement model three subsystems, which include 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry. The base of research is 31 provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions of China. Conclusion. First, the digital economy is innovation as the core driving force of the new economic form, and the deep fusion of sports industry can give new impetus to the development of high-quality sports industry, further promote the development of the quality of sports industry. Second, digital economy development through advanced digital technology can directly and indirectly promote the development of sports industry, digital economy and sports industry quality development have significant spatial correlation, "high-high", "low-low" agglomeration characteristics, digital economy development can significantly promote the regional sports industry development, and the quality of sports industry development is also obvious.
Title: INNOVATIONS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT: ASSESSMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY'S IMPACT ON THE QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPORTS INDUSTRY
Description:
The rapid development of the digital economy has promoted industrial transformation and upgrading, brought changes to the production mode and personal consumption mode of enterprises, and the development of traditional industries are constantly being realised in a digital format.
The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development.
Methodology.
In the index system weighting method is mainly divided into subjective empowerment and objective empowerment, in terms of subjective empowerment, it is based on the relative importance between the indicators by subjective judgment to give appropriate weight, such as principal component analysis, AHP; and objective empowerment is based on the original information to empower, such as cluster analysis, standard deviation, entropy and extreme method, and so forth.
In the selection of measurement method, some scholars believe that the subjective weight method will be disturbed by human factors, which will bias the calculation results, and can not respond to authenticity.
In view of this, this paper adopts the entropy method to measure the high-quality economic development level and digital economy development level in 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019.
The research of current scholars mainly focuses on: the calculation of digital economy comprehensive index, it is only scientific interpretation, lack of empirical research; second, the lack of existing research on digital economy indicators, mostly only from a single perspective; and finally, the lack of analysis of regional heterogeneity of digital economy development.
This paper constructs three subsystems and 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry.
To explore the spatial spillover effect of digital economy development on the high-quality development of sports industry, the high-quality development of sports industry in China in 2011-2020 was taken as the explanatory variable, and the development of digital economy was taken as the explanatory variable.
The purpose of the article is to build spatial measurement model three subsystems, which include 11 basic indicators to construct the evaluation index of digital economy development, and three subsystems and 9 basic indicators to evaluate the high-quality development of sports industry.
The base of research is 31 provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions of China.
Conclusion.
First, the digital economy is innovation as the core driving force of the new economic form, and the deep fusion of sports industry can give new impetus to the development of high-quality sports industry, further promote the development of the quality of sports industry.
Second, digital economy development through advanced digital technology can directly and indirectly promote the development of sports industry, digital economy and sports industry quality development have significant spatial correlation, "high-high", "low-low" agglomeration characteristics, digital economy development can significantly promote the regional sports industry development, and the quality of sports industry development is also obvious.

Related Results

Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
THE INFLUENCE OF MICRO-INFLUENCERS AND DIGITAL MARKETING ON PURCHASE DECISIONS OF TIKTOK SHOP CUSTOMERS IN BENGKULU CITY Andhes Tiani Putri, Meylaty F   12Faculty Of Economic E...
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper—drafted to assist the Australian Government in developing the first national Cultural Policy since Creative Nation nearly two decades ...
RUSSIA IN THE DIGITAL FUTURE: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT
RUSSIA IN THE DIGITAL FUTURE: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Introduction. There are ongoing changes in the economic and social spheres associated with increased information. This trend is taking place in today 's world, as it is not possibl...
ANALYSIS ON OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF SMART UNIVERSITY GYMNASIUM IN CHINA
ANALYSIS ON OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF SMART UNIVERSITY GYMNASIUM IN CHINA
Introduction. With the continuous development of science and technology and the progress of society, the operation and management of smart sports venues has become an important top...
Date
Date
The problem of interpreting the emerging terms of the digital economy is discussed. Examples demonstrating different understanding of the term “digital economy” by economists and i...
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA , THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND RUSSIA
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA , THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND RUSSIA
   The article compares the levels of development of the digital economy of the Republic of Korea, China and Russia. The subject of the study is the strategies and mechanisms for t...

Back to Top