Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Schleiermacher and Friedrich Schlegel
View through CrossRef
AbstractSchlegel and Schleiermacher met in Berlin in 1796. Although working independently, they shared much in common, particularly in philosophy. In his later years, Schleiermacher went back to the period of “symphilosophy” with Schlegel in early Romanticism, as shown in the first section. The second section describes briefly the encounter between Schleiermacher and Schlegel, as well as the development of this relationship, and the traces it left on Schleiermacher. The third section demonstrates how Schleiermacher introduced early Romantic philosophy into the epoch dominated by Hegel as well as the post-Hegelian philosophical epoch. He did this by appropriating the store of ideas created in the “symphilosophical” laboratory of ideas in a systematically directed way, and in doing so transforming it into a discursive form beyond the paradoxes of early Romanticism in the fields of hermeneutics, dialectics, and with the translation of Plato’s dialogues. The last section describes the divergent paths Schlegel and Schleiermacher took after their quarrel about their joint project to translate Plato, which was a breaking point in their relationship.
Title: Schleiermacher and Friedrich Schlegel
Description:
AbstractSchlegel and Schleiermacher met in Berlin in 1796.
Although working independently, they shared much in common, particularly in philosophy.
In his later years, Schleiermacher went back to the period of “symphilosophy” with Schlegel in early Romanticism, as shown in the first section.
The second section describes briefly the encounter between Schleiermacher and Schlegel, as well as the development of this relationship, and the traces it left on Schleiermacher.
The third section demonstrates how Schleiermacher introduced early Romantic philosophy into the epoch dominated by Hegel as well as the post-Hegelian philosophical epoch.
He did this by appropriating the store of ideas created in the “symphilosophical” laboratory of ideas in a systematically directed way, and in doing so transforming it into a discursive form beyond the paradoxes of early Romanticism in the fields of hermeneutics, dialectics, and with the translation of Plato’s dialogues.
The last section describes the divergent paths Schlegel and Schleiermacher took after their quarrel about their joint project to translate Plato, which was a breaking point in their relationship.
Related Results
Mein ,,Sorgenkind“ – mein ,,geliebter Bruder“: Friedrich Schlegel in den Briefen der Schwestern Charlotte und Henriette Ernst sowie der Mutter Johanna Christiane Erdmuthe Schlegel
Mein ,,Sorgenkind“ – mein ,,geliebter Bruder“: Friedrich Schlegel in den Briefen der Schwestern Charlotte und Henriette Ernst sowie der Mutter Johanna Christiane Erdmuthe Schlegel
Abstract Die Korrespondenzen aus dem weiblichen familiären Umfeld der Brüder Friedrich und August Wilhelm Schlegel sind bislang kaum beachtet worden; gemeint sind die Briefe der Sc...
Schleiermacher and the University of Berlin
Schleiermacher and the University of Berlin
Abstract
This chapter analyzes the unique connection between Schleiermacher and the University of Berlin by considering two interlocking aspects of this relationship...
Schleiermacher and the Philosophy of Culture
Schleiermacher and the Philosophy of Culture
Abstract
Against the background of prominent cultural philosophical drafts of the early twentieth century (Simmel, Cassirer), this chapter shows why Schleiermacher’s...
Schleiermacher and Mediating Theology
Schleiermacher and Mediating Theology
Abstract
This chapter examines Friedrich Schleiermacher’s relationship with the mediating theology movement that emerged from German universities. The chapter begins...
Urbanität und Geselligkeit
Urbanität und Geselligkeit
AbstractThe article explores the early Romantic theories of Friedrich Schlegel and Friedrich Schleiermacher, focusing on their re-conception of urbanity (urbanitas) as it relates t...
“Speeches on Religion” by Friedrich Schleiermacher in the Vision of Kyiv Academic Fedir Ornatskyi: an Example of Apologetic Reflection
“Speeches on Religion” by Friedrich Schleiermacher in the Vision of Kyiv Academic Fedir Ornatskyi: an Example of Apologetic Reflection
In this article, we delve into the religious readings of notable Kyiv academic professors from the late 19th to the early 20th centuries. Their works contain a wealth of empirical ...
GEORGE GORDON LORD BYRON UND AUGUST WILHELM SCHLEGEL – ZWEI LEHRER HEINRICH HEINES: HEINES BYRON‐ÜBERSETZUNGEN UND SEINE ENTWICKLUNG ALS DICHTER
GEORGE GORDON LORD BYRON UND AUGUST WILHELM SCHLEGEL – ZWEI LEHRER HEINRICH HEINES: HEINES BYRON‐ÜBERSETZUNGEN UND SEINE ENTWICKLUNG ALS DICHTER
ABSTRACTHeinrich Heine's translations from George Gordon Lord Byron were his only translations and date from the early years of his career. Most of the translations were carried ou...
Dorothea Schlegel als Reiseliteratin. Briefe aus Italien im Mai 1818 an Friedrich Schlegel
Dorothea Schlegel als Reiseliteratin. Briefe aus Italien im Mai 1818 an Friedrich Schlegel
Abstract Von ihrer Reise nach und durch Italien berichtet Dorothea Schlegel dem in Frankfurt verbleibenden Friedrich Schlegel in verschiedenen Briefen im Mai 1818. In den Briefen a...

